Effect of intraperitoneal cetuximab administration on colonic anastomosis and early postoperative adhesion formation in a rat model.

Ulusal cerrahi dergisi Pub Date : 2015-09-01 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.5152/UCD.2016.3250
Atilla Kurt, Hasan Karanlık, Sinan Soylu, İlker Özgür, Hilal Oğuz Soydinç, Derya Duranyıldız, Vakur Olgaç, Fatma Şen, Oktar Asoğlu
{"title":"Effect of intraperitoneal cetuximab administration on colonic anastomosis and early postoperative adhesion formation in a rat model.","authors":"Atilla Kurt,&nbsp;Hasan Karanlık,&nbsp;Sinan Soylu,&nbsp;İlker Özgür,&nbsp;Hilal Oğuz Soydinç,&nbsp;Derya Duranyıldız,&nbsp;Vakur Olgaç,&nbsp;Fatma Şen,&nbsp;Oktar Asoğlu","doi":"10.5152/UCD.2016.3250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the effect of intraperitoneal cetuximab administration on the healing of anastomosis and development of early adhesion formation in a rat model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-four female rats were used. A colon segment was resected and end-to-end anastomosis was performed. The rats were randomized into three groups after the performance of colonic anastomosis and received 10 mL of intraperitoneal solution including study drugs after closure of abdominal cavity: normal saline was administered to the normal saline group (n=8), cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) was administered to the postoperative 1 group (n=8) 1 day after surgery, and cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) was administered to the peroperative group (n=8) during surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean adhesion grade was 2.63±0.92, and 0.50±0.76 and 0.63±0.74 for control and test groups, respectively. Cetuximab reduced adhesion formation in test groups (p<0.05). When all groups were compared, it was found that vascular endothelial growth factor levels decreased significantly only in the abdomen (p<0.05). Hydroxyproline levels and anastomosis bursting pressure were examined, and a statistical difference was found between groups (hydroxyproline p<0.05, bursting pressure p<0.05). However, when postoperative 1 day group was compared with the control group, it was found that there was no difference between groups according to these parameters (p>0.05), but when peroperative group was compared with the control group a significant decrease was observed in both parameters. Histopathological healing score was also evaluated. No statistical difference between groups was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Twenty-four hours later from the operation, intraperitoneal cetuximab therapy may be a safe and feasible treatment for metastatic colorectal patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":90992,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","volume":"32 3","pages":"157-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970771/pdf/ucd-32-3-157.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2016.3250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of intraperitoneal cetuximab administration on the healing of anastomosis and development of early adhesion formation in a rat model.

Materials and methods: Twenty-four female rats were used. A colon segment was resected and end-to-end anastomosis was performed. The rats were randomized into three groups after the performance of colonic anastomosis and received 10 mL of intraperitoneal solution including study drugs after closure of abdominal cavity: normal saline was administered to the normal saline group (n=8), cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) was administered to the postoperative 1 group (n=8) 1 day after surgery, and cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) was administered to the peroperative group (n=8) during surgery.

Results: The mean adhesion grade was 2.63±0.92, and 0.50±0.76 and 0.63±0.74 for control and test groups, respectively. Cetuximab reduced adhesion formation in test groups (p<0.05). When all groups were compared, it was found that vascular endothelial growth factor levels decreased significantly only in the abdomen (p<0.05). Hydroxyproline levels and anastomosis bursting pressure were examined, and a statistical difference was found between groups (hydroxyproline p<0.05, bursting pressure p<0.05). However, when postoperative 1 day group was compared with the control group, it was found that there was no difference between groups according to these parameters (p>0.05), but when peroperative group was compared with the control group a significant decrease was observed in both parameters. Histopathological healing score was also evaluated. No statistical difference between groups was found.

Conclusion: Twenty-four hours later from the operation, intraperitoneal cetuximab therapy may be a safe and feasible treatment for metastatic colorectal patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西妥昔单抗腹腔注射对大鼠结肠吻合及术后早期粘连形成的影响。
目的:探讨西妥昔单抗腹腔注射对大鼠吻合口愈合及早期粘连形成的影响。材料与方法:雌性大鼠24只。切除一段结肠,进行端到端吻合。大鼠在完成结肠吻合后随机分为三组,关闭腹腔后给予含研究药物的腹腔内溶液10 mL:生理盐水组给予生理盐水(n=8),术后1组(n=8)术后1天给予西妥昔单抗(400 mg/m(2)),手术组(n=8)术中给予西妥昔单抗(400 mg/m(2))。结果:对照组和试验组的平均粘附等级分别为2.63±0.92、0.50±0.76和0.63±0.74。西妥昔单抗降低了试验组的粘连形成(p0.05),但手术组与对照组比较,两项指标均显著降低。同时评估组织病理学愈合评分。各组间无统计学差异。结论:术后24小时腹腔注射西妥昔单抗是治疗转移性结直肠癌患者安全可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circulating tumor DNA for monitoring colorectal cancer: A prospective observational study to assess the presence of methylated SEPT9 and VIM promoter genes and its role as a biomarker in colorectal cancer management. Synchronous pancreas and gallbladder cancer with concomitant alopecia totalis. The effects of the use of hyoscine-N-butylbromide during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A retrospective study of diagnosis and management of gallbladder perforation: 10-year experience from a tertiary health care centre. Surgery versus no surgery in stage IV gallbladder carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1