Congenital abnormalities in newborns of women with pregestational diabetes: A time-trend analysis, 1994 to 2009

Mohammad M. Agha, Richard H. Glazier, Rahim Moineddin, Gillian Booth
{"title":"Congenital abnormalities in newborns of women with pregestational diabetes: A time-trend analysis, 1994 to 2009","authors":"Mohammad M. Agha,&nbsp;Richard H. Glazier,&nbsp;Rahim Moineddin,&nbsp;Gillian Booth","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The main objective of the current study is to examine the trend of congenital abnormalities among children born by women with and without diabetes, and to explore the impact of food fortification by folic acid on the rate of birth defects among these two groups of mothers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>All children born alive in Ontario, Canada, during 1994 to 2009 and their mothers were included in study. Diagnosis of pregestational diabetes among mothers was identified using Diabetes registry, and diagnosis of birth defects among children were identified using hospital records.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of births among diabetic mothers increased by almost 200% during the study period. Among children born to mothers with diabetes, the prevalence for all anomalies combined was approximately 47% higher and for various cardiac and central nervous system anomalies up to a three- to fivefold higher than those born to nondiabetic mothers. While the rate of birth defects in both groups observed a considerable decline after food fortification in 1999, but the gap between two groups remained unchanged over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While the prevalence of birth defects among diabetic pregnancies is still considerably higher that nondiabetic pregnancies, results of the current study indicate a declining trend in the prevalence of some congenital abnormalities among babies born to both diabetic and nondiabetic mothers after 1999. We need to be more aggressive in implementing preventive measures, including a national diabetes plan or the proposed universal policy of supra-dietary folic acid supplementation for women with diabetes who are of reproductive age. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:831–839, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":"106 10","pages":"831-839"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdra.23548","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background

The main objective of the current study is to examine the trend of congenital abnormalities among children born by women with and without diabetes, and to explore the impact of food fortification by folic acid on the rate of birth defects among these two groups of mothers.

Methods

All children born alive in Ontario, Canada, during 1994 to 2009 and their mothers were included in study. Diagnosis of pregestational diabetes among mothers was identified using Diabetes registry, and diagnosis of birth defects among children were identified using hospital records.

Results

The prevalence of births among diabetic mothers increased by almost 200% during the study period. Among children born to mothers with diabetes, the prevalence for all anomalies combined was approximately 47% higher and for various cardiac and central nervous system anomalies up to a three- to fivefold higher than those born to nondiabetic mothers. While the rate of birth defects in both groups observed a considerable decline after food fortification in 1999, but the gap between two groups remained unchanged over time.

Conclusion

While the prevalence of birth defects among diabetic pregnancies is still considerably higher that nondiabetic pregnancies, results of the current study indicate a declining trend in the prevalence of some congenital abnormalities among babies born to both diabetic and nondiabetic mothers after 1999. We need to be more aggressive in implementing preventive measures, including a national diabetes plan or the proposed universal policy of supra-dietary folic acid supplementation for women with diabetes who are of reproductive age. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:831–839, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠糖尿病妇女新生儿先天性异常:时间趋势分析,1994年至2009年
本研究的主要目的是研究有糖尿病和无糖尿病母亲所生儿童先天畸形的趋势,并探讨叶酸食物强化对这两组母亲出生缺乏率的影响。方法选取1994 ~ 2009年在加拿大安大略省出生的所有儿童及其母亲为研究对象。使用糖尿病登记来确定母亲的妊娠糖尿病诊断,使用医院记录来确定儿童的出生缺陷诊断。结果在研究期间,糖尿病母亲的出生率增加了近200%。在糖尿病母亲所生的孩子中,所有异常的患病率加起来大约高出47%,各种心脏和中枢神经系统异常的患病率比非糖尿病母亲所生的孩子高出三到五倍。虽然在1999年食物强化后,两组的出生缺陷率都有了相当大的下降,但两组之间的差距一直保持不变。结论虽然糖尿病孕妇出生缺陷的发生率仍明显高于非糖尿病孕妇,但本研究结果表明,1999年以后,糖尿病母亲和非糖尿病母亲所生婴儿的某些先天性异常发生率呈下降趋势。我们需要更加积极地实施预防措施,包括一项国家糖尿病计划或拟议的普遍政策,即为育龄糖尿病妇女提供超膳食叶酸补充。出生缺陷研究(A辑)(06):831 - 839,2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Image Corrigendum for: Levels of folate receptor autoantibodies in maternal and cord blood and risk of neural tube defects in a Chinese population, 106:685–695 (10.1002/bdra.23517) Acardiac twin pregnancies part III: Model simulations. Diprosopus: Systematic review and report of two cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1