Diprosopus: Systematic review and report of two cases.

M. P. Bidondo, B. Groisman, A. Tardivo, F. Tomasoni, Verónica Tejeiro, I. Camacho, M. Vilas, R. Liascovich, P. Barbero
{"title":"Diprosopus: Systematic review and report of two cases.","authors":"M. P. Bidondo, B. Groisman, A. Tardivo, F. Tomasoni, Verónica Tejeiro, I. Camacho, M. Vilas, R. Liascovich, P. Barbero","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nDiprosopus is a subtype of symmetric conjoined twins with one head, facial duplication and a single trunk. Diprosopus is a very rare congenital anomaly.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis is a systematic review of published cases and the presentation of two new cases born in Argentina. We estimated the prevalence of conjoined twins and diprosopus using data from the National Network of Congenital Anomalies of Argentina (RENAC).\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe prevalence of conjoined twins in RENAC was 19 per 1,000,000 births (95% confidence interval, 12-29). Diprosopus prevalence was 2 per 1,000,000 births (95% confidence interval, 0.2-6.8). In the systematic review, we identified 31 diprosopus cases. The facial structures more frequently duplicated were nose and eyes. Most frequent associated anomalies were: anencephaly, duplication of cerebral hemispheres, craniorachischisis, oral clefts, spinal abnormalities, congenital heart defects, diaphragmatic hernia, thoracic and/or abdominal visceral laterality anomalies. One of the RENAC cases and three cases from the literature had another discordant nonmalformed twin.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe conjoined twins prevalence was similar to other studies. The prevalence of diprosopus was higher. The etiology is still unknown. The presence of visceral laterality anomalies may indicate the link between diprosopus and the alteration or duplication of the primitive node in the perigastrulation period (12-15 days postfertilization). Pregnancies of more than two embryos may be a risk factor for diprosopus. Given the low prevalence of this defect, it would be useful to perform studies involving several surveillance systems and international consortiums. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:993-1007, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":"90 1","pages":"993-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.23549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

BACKGROUND Diprosopus is a subtype of symmetric conjoined twins with one head, facial duplication and a single trunk. Diprosopus is a very rare congenital anomaly. METHODS This is a systematic review of published cases and the presentation of two new cases born in Argentina. We estimated the prevalence of conjoined twins and diprosopus using data from the National Network of Congenital Anomalies of Argentina (RENAC). RESULTS The prevalence of conjoined twins in RENAC was 19 per 1,000,000 births (95% confidence interval, 12-29). Diprosopus prevalence was 2 per 1,000,000 births (95% confidence interval, 0.2-6.8). In the systematic review, we identified 31 diprosopus cases. The facial structures more frequently duplicated were nose and eyes. Most frequent associated anomalies were: anencephaly, duplication of cerebral hemispheres, craniorachischisis, oral clefts, spinal abnormalities, congenital heart defects, diaphragmatic hernia, thoracic and/or abdominal visceral laterality anomalies. One of the RENAC cases and three cases from the literature had another discordant nonmalformed twin. CONCLUSION The conjoined twins prevalence was similar to other studies. The prevalence of diprosopus was higher. The etiology is still unknown. The presence of visceral laterality anomalies may indicate the link between diprosopus and the alteration or duplication of the primitive node in the perigastrulation period (12-15 days postfertilization). Pregnancies of more than two embryos may be a risk factor for diprosopus. Given the low prevalence of this defect, it would be useful to perform studies involving several surveillance systems and international consortiums. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:993-1007, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双足虫:系统回顾并报告两例。
双头龙是对称连体双胞胎的一个亚型,有一个头,面部重复和一个躯干。双足畸形是一种非常罕见的先天性畸形。方法:这是对已发表病例的系统回顾,并介绍了阿根廷出生的两例新病例。我们使用阿根廷国家先天性异常网络(RENAC)的数据估计了连体双胞胎和双胎的患病率。结果RENAC的连体双胞胎患病率为19 / 100万(95%可信区间为12-29)。双棘虫患病率为每100万新生儿2例(95%可信区间,0.2-6.8)。在系统综述中,我们发现了31例双足病例。面部结构的重复频率更高的是鼻子和眼睛。最常见的相关异常是:无脑畸形、大脑半球重复、颅裂、口裂、脊柱异常、先天性心脏缺陷、膈疝、胸廓和/或腹部内脏侧侧异常。一例RENAC病例和文献中的三例有另一个不一致的非畸形双胞胎。结论连体双胞胎患病率与其他研究相似。双足虫的患病率较高。病因尚不清楚。内脏侧性异常的存在可能表明双足畸形与孕周(受精后12-15天)原始淋巴结的改变或复制有关。超过两个胚胎的妊娠可能是双胎畸形的危险因素。鉴于这一缺陷的患病率较低,进行涉及几个监测系统和国际财团的研究将是有用的。出生缺陷研究(上),2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司出生缺陷研究(A部分)106:993- 1007,2016。©2016 Wiley期刊公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Image Corrigendum for: Levels of folate receptor autoantibodies in maternal and cord blood and risk of neural tube defects in a Chinese population, 106:685–695 (10.1002/bdra.23517) Acardiac twin pregnancies part III: Model simulations. Diprosopus: Systematic review and report of two cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1