Correction of Point-of-Care INR Results in Warfarin Patients.

Q3 Nursing Point of Care Pub Date : 2016-03-01 DOI:10.1097/POC.0000000000000077
Christopher Richter, James Taylor, Jonathan Shuster
{"title":"Correction of Point-of-Care INR Results in Warfarin Patients.","authors":"Christopher Richter, James Taylor, Jonathan Shuster","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The measurement of international normalization ratio (INR) may be done by venous blood draw and use of a standard lab, or by fingerstick, using a point of care (POC) device such as the CoaguChek XS<sup>®</sup> (Roche Diagnostics), and the CoaguChek XS<sup>®</sup> has been validated to meet the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) performance requirements.</p><p><strong>Overview: </strong>The goal of this study was to determine a correction factor for Coaguchek XS INR levels to a predicted venipuncture (VP) INR level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At the end of an anticoagulation clinic visit when a patient had an INR greater than or equal to 4, two INR results existed, that from the Coaguchek XS<sup>®</sup> meter and a venipuncture INR from the lab. The data were then discreetly recorded as a quality control for our clinic. The data were analyzed for possible significant trends between the two types of INR results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The equation that was determined to be the best fit to the data was 0.621 × POC + 0.639 = estimated VP. The overall root mean square error (MSE) for the calculated correction was a 0.44 INR. The root mean square errors were 0.41 and 0.58 for the 4 to 5.9 and 6 to 7.9 POC INR groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The calculation that was derived in this study is not a surrogate for venipuncture INR in this clinic. However, the estimation of the INR may be useful clinically in guiding decision making in the future. (INR, Point of Care, Anticoagulation, Hematology).</p>","PeriodicalId":44085,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4834836/pdf/nihms724652.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The measurement of international normalization ratio (INR) may be done by venous blood draw and use of a standard lab, or by fingerstick, using a point of care (POC) device such as the CoaguChek XS® (Roche Diagnostics), and the CoaguChek XS® has been validated to meet the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) performance requirements.

Overview: The goal of this study was to determine a correction factor for Coaguchek XS INR levels to a predicted venipuncture (VP) INR level.

Methods: At the end of an anticoagulation clinic visit when a patient had an INR greater than or equal to 4, two INR results existed, that from the Coaguchek XS® meter and a venipuncture INR from the lab. The data were then discreetly recorded as a quality control for our clinic. The data were analyzed for possible significant trends between the two types of INR results.

Results: The equation that was determined to be the best fit to the data was 0.621 × POC + 0.639 = estimated VP. The overall root mean square error (MSE) for the calculated correction was a 0.44 INR. The root mean square errors were 0.41 and 0.58 for the 4 to 5.9 and 6 to 7.9 POC INR groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The calculation that was derived in this study is not a surrogate for venipuncture INR in this clinic. However, the estimation of the INR may be useful clinically in guiding decision making in the future. (INR, Point of Care, Anticoagulation, Hematology).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纠正华法林患者的医护点 INR 结果。
背景:国际正常化比值(INR)的测量可通过静脉抽血和使用标准实验室进行,或通过使用CoaguChek XS®(罗氏诊断公司)等护理点(POC)设备进行指针测量,CoaguChek XS®已通过验证,符合国际标准化组织(ISO)的性能要求:本研究的目的是确定 Coaguchek XS INR 水平与预测静脉穿刺 (VP) INR 水平的校正系数:方法:在抗凝门诊结束时,当患者的 INR 大于或等于 4 时,会有两个 INR 结果,一个是来自 Coaguchek XS® 血凝仪的 INR,另一个是来自实验室的静脉穿刺 INR。这些数据随后被谨慎地记录下来,作为我们诊所的质量控制依据。我们对数据进行了分析,以确定两种 INR 结果之间可能存在的显著趋势:经确定,最适合数据的等式为 0.621 × POC + 0.639 = 估计 VP。计算校正的总体均方根误差(MSE)为 0.44 INR。4 至 5.9 和 6 至 7.9 POC INR 组的均方根误差分别为 0.41 和 0.58:结论:本研究得出的计算结果并不能代替本诊所的静脉穿刺 INR。然而,INR 的估算可能对临床有用,有助于指导未来的决策制定。(INR、医疗点、抗凝、血液学)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Point of Care
Point of Care MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology is a vital resource for directors and managers of large and small hospital pathology labs, blood centers, home health-care agencies, doctors" offices, and other healthcare facilities. Each issue brings you peer-reviewed original research articles, along with concepts, technologies and trends, covering topics that include: Test accuracy Turnaround time Data management Quality control Regulatory compliance Cost-effectiveness of testing
期刊最新文献
Patient Preferences for Point-of-Care Testing: Survey Validation and Results. Overcoming Challenges with the Adoption of Point-of-Care Testing: From Technology Push and Clinical Needs to Value Propositions. Toward Improving Accessibility of Point-of-Care Diagnostic Services for Maternal and Child Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Central Vietnam: International Exchange, Needs Assessment, and Spatial Care Paths. Healthcare worker feedback on a prototype smartphone-based point-of-care test platform for use in episodic care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1