Patient Preferences for Point-of-Care Testing: Survey Validation and Results.

Q3 Nursing Point of Care Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1097/poc.0000000000000214
Craig M Lilly, Emily Ensom, Sean Teebagy, Danielle DiMezza, Denise Dunlap, Nathaniel Hafer, Bryan Buchholz, David McManus
{"title":"Patient Preferences for Point-of-Care Testing: Survey Validation and Results.","authors":"Craig M Lilly,&nbsp;Emily Ensom,&nbsp;Sean Teebagy,&nbsp;Danielle DiMezza,&nbsp;Denise Dunlap,&nbsp;Nathaniel Hafer,&nbsp;Bryan Buchholz,&nbsp;David McManus","doi":"10.1097/poc.0000000000000214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies of current opinion of our community members for the characteristics, mode, and location of use, use cases, and overall enthusiasm for point-of-care testing (POCT) diagnosis and management tools are needed.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Qualitative research methods were used to develop, refine, and evaluate hardcopy and electronic versions of a 45-item English language survey. The accuracy of the instrument was measured by recorded structured interview, and its precision was measured by comparison to its administration to a group of uncompensated volunteers.</p><p><strong>Main findings and results: </strong>Comparison of survey and structured interview data demonstrated high levels of accuracy. Highly concordant with significant levels of correlation and of direct association indicated favorable precision. Ninety-three percent of respondents believed that POCT could improve their care, and 56% identified having a POCT in their home as a top priority. Accuracy, insurance coverage, immediacy of results, and ease of use were identified as the most important characteristics of a POCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community members strongly support the development of accurate, in-home devices that produce immediate results that can be used to diagnose, manage, and encourage their adherence to treatments for their medical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44085,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care","volume":"19 4","pages":"112-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547737/pdf/nihms-1702123.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/poc.0000000000000214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Studies of current opinion of our community members for the characteristics, mode, and location of use, use cases, and overall enthusiasm for point-of-care testing (POCT) diagnosis and management tools are needed.

Study design and methods: Qualitative research methods were used to develop, refine, and evaluate hardcopy and electronic versions of a 45-item English language survey. The accuracy of the instrument was measured by recorded structured interview, and its precision was measured by comparison to its administration to a group of uncompensated volunteers.

Main findings and results: Comparison of survey and structured interview data demonstrated high levels of accuracy. Highly concordant with significant levels of correlation and of direct association indicated favorable precision. Ninety-three percent of respondents believed that POCT could improve their care, and 56% identified having a POCT in their home as a top priority. Accuracy, insurance coverage, immediacy of results, and ease of use were identified as the most important characteristics of a POCT.

Conclusions: Community members strongly support the development of accurate, in-home devices that produce immediate results that can be used to diagnose, manage, and encourage their adherence to treatments for their medical conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对即时护理测试的偏好:调查验证和结果。
背景:需要研究当前社区成员对使用特征、模式和位置、用例以及对护理点检测(POCT)诊断和管理工具的总体热情的看法。研究设计和方法:采用定性研究方法开发、完善和评估45项英语语言调查的纸质版和电子版。仪器的准确性是通过记录的结构化访谈来衡量的,其精度是通过与一组无偿志愿者的管理进行比较来衡量的。主要发现和结果:调查和结构化访谈数据的比较显示出高水平的准确性。高度一致的显著水平的相关和直接关联表明良好的精度。93%的受访者认为POCT可以改善他们的护理,56%的受访者认为在家中设置POCT是重中之重。准确性、保险范围、结果的即时性和易用性被认为是POCT最重要的特征。结论:社区成员强烈支持开发准确的家用设备,这些设备可以立即产生结果,用于诊断、管理和鼓励他们坚持治疗他们的医疗状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Point of Care
Point of Care MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology is a vital resource for directors and managers of large and small hospital pathology labs, blood centers, home health-care agencies, doctors" offices, and other healthcare facilities. Each issue brings you peer-reviewed original research articles, along with concepts, technologies and trends, covering topics that include: Test accuracy Turnaround time Data management Quality control Regulatory compliance Cost-effectiveness of testing
期刊最新文献
Patient Preferences for Point-of-Care Testing: Survey Validation and Results. Overcoming Challenges with the Adoption of Point-of-Care Testing: From Technology Push and Clinical Needs to Value Propositions. Toward Improving Accessibility of Point-of-Care Diagnostic Services for Maternal and Child Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Central Vietnam: International Exchange, Needs Assessment, and Spatial Care Paths. Healthcare worker feedback on a prototype smartphone-based point-of-care test platform for use in episodic care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1