[The effect of suggestibility on eyewitness identifications: A comparison between showups and lineups].

Q4 Psychology Shinrigaku Kenkyu Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.87.14073
Hiroshi Miura, Yuji Itoh
{"title":"[The effect of suggestibility on eyewitness identifications: A comparison between showups and lineups].","authors":"Hiroshi Miura,&nbsp;Yuji Itoh","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.87.14073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are two types of eyewitness-identification procedures: showups and lineups. Although the false-identification rate of showups was considered to be higher than that of lineups, experimental research has not always supported the superiority of lineups. Further, suggestibility of showups is believed to produce higher false-identification rates, but no experimental study has manipulated suggestibility. In this study, we manipulated suggestibility; 258 participants performed photo identification in a showup or lineup. The results revealed that the correct-identification rate was higher in the showups than the lineups, and the rate of dangerous false identification for the innocent suspect did not differ between showups and lineups. In lineups alone, the false-identification rate of the high-suggestibility.condition was marginally higher than that of the low-suggestibility condition. The results indicate that suggestibility, which results from the preconception that the perpetrator must exist in the photos, increases false identifications in relative judgments, such as in lineups.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are two types of eyewitness-identification procedures: showups and lineups. Although the false-identification rate of showups was considered to be higher than that of lineups, experimental research has not always supported the superiority of lineups. Further, suggestibility of showups is believed to produce higher false-identification rates, but no experimental study has manipulated suggestibility. In this study, we manipulated suggestibility; 258 participants performed photo identification in a showup or lineup. The results revealed that the correct-identification rate was higher in the showups than the lineups, and the rate of dangerous false identification for the innocent suspect did not differ between showups and lineups. In lineups alone, the false-identification rate of the high-suggestibility.condition was marginally higher than that of the low-suggestibility condition. The results indicate that suggestibility, which results from the preconception that the perpetrator must exist in the photos, increases false identifications in relative judgments, such as in lineups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[易受暗示性对目击证人辨认的影响:表演和列队之间的比较]。
有两种类型的证人鉴定程序:指认和指认。虽然显示组的误认率被认为高于列队组,但实验研究并不总是支持列队组的优势。此外,暗示被认为会产生更高的错误识别率,但没有实验研究操纵暗示。在这项研究中,我们操纵了易受暗示;258名参与者在展示或列队中进行照片识别。结果显示,指认组的正确率高于指认组,而指认组和指认组之间对无辜嫌疑人的危险错误指认率没有差异。在单独的队列中,高易受暗示者的误认率。低暗示组与低暗示组差异有统计学意义。结果表明,由于人们对照片中肇事者一定存在的先入为主的观念,暗示性增加了相对判断中的错误识别,例如在队列中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
Shinrigaku Kenkyu Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Development of the Japanese version of the Peer Conflict Scale Development of the Japanese version of the Theories of Mind Wandering Scale and testing its reliability and validity Development of the Japanese version of the Financial Threat Scale Do changes in beliefs improve creativity? Investigation of an odor intensity evaluation:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1