{"title":"Non-visualisation of strings after postplacental insertion of Copper-T 380A intrauterine device.","authors":"Rupali Dewan, Abhinav Dewan, Sunita Singal, Rekha Bharti, Mansi Kaim","doi":"10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the incidence of visible strings of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) after postplacental insertion following vaginal or caesarean delivery and to establish a management protocol of follow-up visits when strings are not visualised.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study of a cohort of 348 women who underwent postplacental insertion of Copper-T 380A IUDs following vaginal or caesarean delivery, conducted at a hospital in New Delhi, India. Women were followed up at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after IUD insertion and were questioned about IUD expulsion or removal at each visit. The cervix was inspected to visualise the IUD strings. All women whose IUD strings could not be visualised at the cervical os at any given follow-up were identified. We analysed the cumulative incidence of visible strings and of procedures performed to locate the IUD when strings were not visible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1 year follow-up, the IUD was <i>in situ</i> in 313/348 (89.9%) women. There were eight (2.3%) expulsions and 15 (4.3%) IUD removals. Among women with IUDs <i>in situ</i>, the strings were not visible in 73 (21%) cases. Pelvic ultrasound confirmed intrauterine position of the IUDs in these cases. At 1 year, string visibility was significantly lower after intra-caesarean insertions as compared to vaginal insertions (72.4% vs 98.1%; <i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visualisation of strings after postplacental vaginal insertion is more common than after intra-caesarean insertion. Pelvic ultrasonography can be used to verify the presence of the device in cases of missing strings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","volume":"43 3","pages":"186-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101200","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2015-101200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
Aim: To assess the incidence of visible strings of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) after postplacental insertion following vaginal or caesarean delivery and to establish a management protocol of follow-up visits when strings are not visualised.
Methods: This was a prospective study of a cohort of 348 women who underwent postplacental insertion of Copper-T 380A IUDs following vaginal or caesarean delivery, conducted at a hospital in New Delhi, India. Women were followed up at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after IUD insertion and were questioned about IUD expulsion or removal at each visit. The cervix was inspected to visualise the IUD strings. All women whose IUD strings could not be visualised at the cervical os at any given follow-up were identified. We analysed the cumulative incidence of visible strings and of procedures performed to locate the IUD when strings were not visible.
Results: At 1 year follow-up, the IUD was in situ in 313/348 (89.9%) women. There were eight (2.3%) expulsions and 15 (4.3%) IUD removals. Among women with IUDs in situ, the strings were not visible in 73 (21%) cases. Pelvic ultrasound confirmed intrauterine position of the IUDs in these cases. At 1 year, string visibility was significantly lower after intra-caesarean insertions as compared to vaginal insertions (72.4% vs 98.1%; p<0.05).
Conclusions: Visualisation of strings after postplacental vaginal insertion is more common than after intra-caesarean insertion. Pelvic ultrasonography can be used to verify the presence of the device in cases of missing strings.
目的:评估阴道分娩或剖宫产后置入宫内节育器后可见串状物的发生率,并建立串状物未可见时的随访管理方案。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,在印度新德里的一家医院进行的一项队列研究,348名妇女在阴道或剖宫产后接受胎盘后插入铜- t 380A宫内节育器。妇女在宫内节育器植入后6周、3、6和12个月随访,并在每次就诊时询问宫内节育器的取出或取出情况。检查子宫颈以观察宫内节育器串。所有的妇女,其宫内节育器串不能在任何给定的随访观察宫颈。我们分析了可见字符串的累积发生率,以及在字符串不可见时进行定位宫内节育器的程序。结果:随访1年时,348名妇女中有313名(89.9%)的宫内节育器仍在原位。8例(2.3%)排出,15例(4.3%)取出宫内节育器。在原位放置宫内节育器的女性中,73例(21%)患者看不到节育器串。盆腔超声确认宫内节育器在这些病例中的位置。1年后,剖宫产插入后的穿刺针能见度明显低于阴道插入(72.4% vs 98.1%;结论:胎盘后阴道插入术比剖宫产术更常见。盆腔超声检查可以用来验证该设备的存在,在情况下,缺失的字符串。