What is standing in the way of complete prevention of folate preventable neural tube defects?

James L. Mills, Aggeliki Dimopoulos, Regan L. Bailey
{"title":"What is standing in the way of complete prevention of folate preventable neural tube defects?","authors":"James L. Mills,&nbsp;Aggeliki Dimopoulos,&nbsp;Regan L. Bailey","doi":"10.1002/bdra.23518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is well known that there is a large gap between the number of neural tube defects (NTDs) that could be prevented by folic acid and the number that are actually being prevented. Arth and colleagues demonstrate just how large that gap is (Arth et al., <span>2016</span>). The question is: why are so many potentially preventable NTDs not being prevented?</p><p>Campaigns recommending that women of childbearing age take folic acid supplements routinely and voluntary fortification programs have had only modest success at best (Khoshnood et al., <span>2015</span>). Therefore, mandatory fortification has been instituted in almost 80 countries (Food Fortification Initiative, 2016). As Arth et al. demonstrate, many countries have not embraced the mandatory fortification approach, despite the fact that it has prevented an average of 40 to 50% of NTDs (Castillo-Lancellotti et al., <span>2013</span>).</p><p>Concerns regarding the safety of folic acid fortification are one reason. Two major concerns are masking vitamin B12 deficiency and increasing cancer risk. It should be noted that the amount of folic acid people receive from fortified food in the United States, where fortification of enriched cereal grain products is mandatory, is an average of 163 micrograms per day in women of childbearing age, less than half the recommended dietary allowance (Tinker et al., <span>2010</span>). This is sufficient to prevent folate-related NTDs (Mosley et al., <span>2009</span>) but does not appear to cause masking of the hematological signs of vitamin B12 deficiency (Mills et al., <span>2003</span>). A large meta-analysis of participants in folic acid trials demonstrated that, after an average of 5 years of follow-up, the relative risk for incident cancer was 1.06 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.99 to 1.13 (Vollset et al., <span>2013</span>).</p><p>The authors noted that the 6% increase was not statistically significant and that trial participants were exposed to far higher doses than fortification would deliver. There was no significant increase in any individual cancers studied. Nonetheless, concerns persist regarding cancer risk (van Wijngaarden et al., <span>2014</span>) and other possible but unproved risks (National Toxicology Program, 2015). It is important to note that the amount of folic acid needed to prevent NTDs is far less than the amount likely to cause adverse effects (Mills and Dimopoulos, <span>2015</span>). Because NTDs are uncommon events and a small increase in cancer would affect a substantial number of people, some countries have been reluctant to require fortification. It should be noted, however, that mandatory fortification has caused a dramatic reduction in folate deficiency (Pfeiffer et al., <span>2012</span>); so the benefit is not limited to a small group.</p><p>Several other obstacles to mandatory fortification exist. Although European Union (EU) regulation No. 1925/2006 (European Commission, 2006) acknowledges the need for mandatory food fortification with vitamins in member states to address public health concerns, some countries resist the idea of manipulating the food supply. Merchants who want to sell their goods throughout the EU may choose not to fortify to make their products more attractive in these countries. On the other hand, widespread voluntary fortification in countries where it is permitted creates a possible problem maintaining exposure within a safe range. It has been suggested that voluntary fortification be regulated as mandatory fortification is instituted to avoid excessive exposure.</p><p>Developing countries face a different set of problems with mandatory fortification. The report, “Strategic Paper: Fortification of rice and wheat flour with vitamins and minerals in the Western Pacific region” (Food Fortification Initiative, 2013), provides an excellent outline of the issues that need to be resolved before implementation. In some parts of the world, finding a food that is consumed by a large proportion of the population at risk and can be fortified may be a problem. Where grain is milled locally in small mills, getting folic acid and mixing it in the proper amount to ensure safe, effective fortification is a serious problem. Large mills are the practical place to fortify. Wheat and maize fortification are relatively easy when large mills produce most of the flour although the cost of equipment could be an obstacle. Fortifying rice is more difficult (USAID, <span>2008</span>). Some techniques may produce a product that has an unacceptable taste or appearance. Coating rice may also be ineffective if the rice is washed or rinsed. Hot extrusion, the technique that produces normal looking and tasting rice that retains folic acid well, is relatively expensive and requires a major investment in processing equipment. Mandatory fortification must be mandated at the national level to ensure good coverage, facilitate quality control monitoring, and put all manufacturers on an equal footing regarding production cost.</p><p>Finally, in resource poor countries, folic acid fortification must be weighed against other pressing public health needs. HIV-AIDS caused an estimated 1.5 million deaths in 2013 (Global Health Observatory data [<span>2013</span>] http://www.who.int/gho/hiv/epidemic_status/deaths/en/). Vitamin A deficiency was responsible for an estimated 105,000 deaths in 2013 (Stevens et al., <span>2015</span>). Advocates for NTD prevention are competing with interventions to prevent other causes of death and disability. In areas where there are multiple problems related to nutritional deficiencies, strategies could be developed to fortify with other critical micronutrients such as iron or vitamin A. Fortunately, the incremental cost of adding additional micronutrients to the mix is quite small. Thus, the priority for folic acid fortification could be raised by combining it with other critical micronutrients such as vitamin A and iron depending on the country.</p><p>All these obstacles must be overcome if all folate related NTDs are to be prevented. Addressing these problems will not be easy and requires the expertise of a wide range of authorities from engineers to chemists, to legislators, to public health experts. The benefits of safe, effective mandatory fortification programs in preventing NTDs are very well documented. Reducing folate deficiency anemia rates has been an important fringe benefit. Adding additional micronutrients could cause a major reduction in morbidity and mortality due to other micronutrient deficiencies. In short, preventing all folate preventable NTDs will not be easy, but it is a goal worth pursuing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8983,"journal":{"name":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bdra.23518","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdra.23518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

It is well known that there is a large gap between the number of neural tube defects (NTDs) that could be prevented by folic acid and the number that are actually being prevented. Arth and colleagues demonstrate just how large that gap is (Arth et al., 2016). The question is: why are so many potentially preventable NTDs not being prevented?

Campaigns recommending that women of childbearing age take folic acid supplements routinely and voluntary fortification programs have had only modest success at best (Khoshnood et al., 2015). Therefore, mandatory fortification has been instituted in almost 80 countries (Food Fortification Initiative, 2016). As Arth et al. demonstrate, many countries have not embraced the mandatory fortification approach, despite the fact that it has prevented an average of 40 to 50% of NTDs (Castillo-Lancellotti et al., 2013).

Concerns regarding the safety of folic acid fortification are one reason. Two major concerns are masking vitamin B12 deficiency and increasing cancer risk. It should be noted that the amount of folic acid people receive from fortified food in the United States, where fortification of enriched cereal grain products is mandatory, is an average of 163 micrograms per day in women of childbearing age, less than half the recommended dietary allowance (Tinker et al., 2010). This is sufficient to prevent folate-related NTDs (Mosley et al., 2009) but does not appear to cause masking of the hematological signs of vitamin B12 deficiency (Mills et al., 2003). A large meta-analysis of participants in folic acid trials demonstrated that, after an average of 5 years of follow-up, the relative risk for incident cancer was 1.06 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.99 to 1.13 (Vollset et al., 2013).

The authors noted that the 6% increase was not statistically significant and that trial participants were exposed to far higher doses than fortification would deliver. There was no significant increase in any individual cancers studied. Nonetheless, concerns persist regarding cancer risk (van Wijngaarden et al., 2014) and other possible but unproved risks (National Toxicology Program, 2015). It is important to note that the amount of folic acid needed to prevent NTDs is far less than the amount likely to cause adverse effects (Mills and Dimopoulos, 2015). Because NTDs are uncommon events and a small increase in cancer would affect a substantial number of people, some countries have been reluctant to require fortification. It should be noted, however, that mandatory fortification has caused a dramatic reduction in folate deficiency (Pfeiffer et al., 2012); so the benefit is not limited to a small group.

Several other obstacles to mandatory fortification exist. Although European Union (EU) regulation No. 1925/2006 (European Commission, 2006) acknowledges the need for mandatory food fortification with vitamins in member states to address public health concerns, some countries resist the idea of manipulating the food supply. Merchants who want to sell their goods throughout the EU may choose not to fortify to make their products more attractive in these countries. On the other hand, widespread voluntary fortification in countries where it is permitted creates a possible problem maintaining exposure within a safe range. It has been suggested that voluntary fortification be regulated as mandatory fortification is instituted to avoid excessive exposure.

Developing countries face a different set of problems with mandatory fortification. The report, “Strategic Paper: Fortification of rice and wheat flour with vitamins and minerals in the Western Pacific region” (Food Fortification Initiative, 2013), provides an excellent outline of the issues that need to be resolved before implementation. In some parts of the world, finding a food that is consumed by a large proportion of the population at risk and can be fortified may be a problem. Where grain is milled locally in small mills, getting folic acid and mixing it in the proper amount to ensure safe, effective fortification is a serious problem. Large mills are the practical place to fortify. Wheat and maize fortification are relatively easy when large mills produce most of the flour although the cost of equipment could be an obstacle. Fortifying rice is more difficult (USAID, 2008). Some techniques may produce a product that has an unacceptable taste or appearance. Coating rice may also be ineffective if the rice is washed or rinsed. Hot extrusion, the technique that produces normal looking and tasting rice that retains folic acid well, is relatively expensive and requires a major investment in processing equipment. Mandatory fortification must be mandated at the national level to ensure good coverage, facilitate quality control monitoring, and put all manufacturers on an equal footing regarding production cost.

Finally, in resource poor countries, folic acid fortification must be weighed against other pressing public health needs. HIV-AIDS caused an estimated 1.5 million deaths in 2013 (Global Health Observatory data [2013] http://www.who.int/gho/hiv/epidemic_status/deaths/en/). Vitamin A deficiency was responsible for an estimated 105,000 deaths in 2013 (Stevens et al., 2015). Advocates for NTD prevention are competing with interventions to prevent other causes of death and disability. In areas where there are multiple problems related to nutritional deficiencies, strategies could be developed to fortify with other critical micronutrients such as iron or vitamin A. Fortunately, the incremental cost of adding additional micronutrients to the mix is quite small. Thus, the priority for folic acid fortification could be raised by combining it with other critical micronutrients such as vitamin A and iron depending on the country.

All these obstacles must be overcome if all folate related NTDs are to be prevented. Addressing these problems will not be easy and requires the expertise of a wide range of authorities from engineers to chemists, to legislators, to public health experts. The benefits of safe, effective mandatory fortification programs in preventing NTDs are very well documented. Reducing folate deficiency anemia rates has been an important fringe benefit. Adding additional micronutrients could cause a major reduction in morbidity and mortality due to other micronutrient deficiencies. In short, preventing all folate preventable NTDs will not be easy, but it is a goal worth pursuing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是什么阻碍了叶酸可预防神经管缺陷的完全预防?
众所周知,叶酸可以预防的神经管缺陷(NTDs)的数量与实际预防的数量之间存在很大差距。Arth及其同事证明了这一差距有多大(Arth et al., 2016)。问题是:为什么这么多本可预防的被忽视热带病没有得到预防?建议育龄妇女定期服用叶酸补充剂和自愿强化计划的运动充其量只取得了有限的成功(Khoshnood等人,2015)。因此,强制性强化已在近80个国家建立(食品强化倡议,2016)。正如Arth等人所证明的那样,许多国家尚未采用强制性强化方法,尽管它平均阻止了40%至50%的被忽视热带病(Castillo-Lancellotti等人,2013)。对叶酸强化安全性的担忧是原因之一。两个主要的担忧是掩盖维生素B12缺乏和增加癌症风险。值得注意的是,在美国,人们从强化食品中获得的叶酸量,在强化谷物产品是强制性的,育龄妇女平均每天摄入163微克,不到推荐膳食量的一半(Tinker等人,2010)。这足以预防叶酸相关的NTDs (Mosley等人,2009),但似乎不会导致掩盖维生素B12缺乏的血液学症状(Mills等人,2003)。一项针对叶酸试验参与者的大型荟萃分析表明,在平均5年的随访后,癌症发生的相对风险为1.06,95%可信区间为0.99至1.13 (Vollset et al., 2013)。作者指出,6%的增加在统计上并不显著,而且试验参与者暴露于比强化所能提供的剂量高得多的剂量。所研究的任何一种癌症的发病率都没有显著增加。尽管如此,人们仍然担心癌症风险(van Wijngaarden et al., 2014)和其他可能但未经证实的风险(National Toxicology Program, 2015)。值得注意的是,预防ntd所需的叶酸量远远小于可能导致不良反应的量(Mills和Dimopoulos, 2015)。由于被忽视的热带病是不常见的事件,癌症的小幅增加会影响相当多的人,一些国家一直不愿要求强化。然而,应该指出的是,强制性强化导致叶酸缺乏症显著减少(Pfeiffer et al., 2012);因此,这种益处并不局限于一小群人。强制设防还存在其他几个障碍。尽管欧洲联盟(欧盟)第1925/2006号条例(欧洲委员会,2006年)承认有必要在成员国强制强化食品中添加维生素,以解决公众健康问题,但一些国家反对操纵食品供应的想法。想要在整个欧盟销售商品的商人可能会选择不加强,以使他们的产品在这些国家更具吸引力。另一方面,在允许强化的国家中,广泛的自愿强化可能会造成将暴露量保持在安全范围内的问题。有人建议,自愿强化应作为强制性强化加以管制,以避免过度暴露。发展中国家在强制强化食品方面面临着一系列不同的问题。《战略文件:西太平洋地区在大米和小麦粉中添加维生素和矿物质》(《食品强化倡议》,2013年)的报告很好地概述了在实施之前需要解决的问题。在世界上的一些地区,找到一种可供大部分高危人群食用并可进行强化的食物可能是一个问题。谷物是在当地的小磨坊里碾磨的,获取叶酸并混合适量以确保安全有效的强化是一个严重的问题。大型工厂是防御工事的实际场所。当大磨坊生产大部分面粉时,小麦和玉米的强化相对容易,尽管设备成本可能是一个障碍。强化大米更为困难(美国国际开发署,2008年)。有些技术可能会生产出味道或外观令人无法接受的产品。如果大米被洗过或漂洗过,包衣也可能无效。热挤压技术可以生产出外观和口感正常的大米,并能很好地保留叶酸,但这种技术相对昂贵,需要在加工设备上进行大量投资。强制性强化必须在国家层面强制执行,以确保良好的覆盖范围,促进质量控制监测,并使所有制造商在生产成本方面处于平等地位。最后,在资源贫乏的国家,必须权衡叶酸强化与其他紧迫的公共卫生需求。 2013年,艾滋病毒/艾滋病估计造成150万人死亡(全球卫生观察站数据[2013]http://www.who.int/gho/hiv/epidemic_status/deaths/en/)。2013年,维生素A缺乏症导致约10.5万人死亡(Stevens et al., 2015)。预防非传染性疾病的倡导者正在与预防其他死亡和残疾原因的干预措施竞争。在存在与营养缺乏有关的多重问题的地区,可以制定战略,用铁或维生素a等其他关键微量营养素进行强化。幸运的是,在混合中添加额外微量营养素的增量成本相当小。因此,可以根据国家的不同,将叶酸与维生素A和铁等其他关键微量营养素结合起来,从而提高叶酸强化的优先级。如果要预防所有与叶酸有关的热带病,就必须克服所有这些障碍。解决这些问题并非易事,需要工程师、化学家、立法者和公共卫生专家等广泛权威人士的专业知识。安全、有效的强制性强化项目在预防被忽视热带病方面的好处是有据可查的。降低叶酸缺乏性贫血的发病率是一个重要的附带好处。添加额外的微量营养素可大大降低由于缺乏其他微量营养素而导致的发病率和死亡率。简而言之,预防所有叶酸可预防的被忽视热带病并不容易,但这是一个值得追求的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology
Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology 医药科学, 胎儿发育与产前诊断, 生殖系统/围生医学/新生儿
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Image Corrigendum for: Levels of folate receptor autoantibodies in maternal and cord blood and risk of neural tube defects in a Chinese population, 106:685–695 (10.1002/bdra.23517) Acardiac twin pregnancies part III: Model simulations. Diprosopus: Systematic review and report of two cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1