Biochemical biomarkers are not dependent on physical exercise in patients with spinal cord injury

Eduardo José R. Garbeloti, Raquel Caroline A. Paiva, Carolina Baraldi A. Restini, Marina T. Durand, Carlos Eduardo S. Miranda, Vinicius Eduardo Teixeira
{"title":"Biochemical biomarkers are not dependent on physical exercise in patients with spinal cord injury","authors":"Eduardo José R. Garbeloti,&nbsp;Raquel Caroline A. Paiva,&nbsp;Carolina Baraldi A. Restini,&nbsp;Marina T. Durand,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo S. Miranda,&nbsp;Vinicius Eduardo Teixeira","doi":"10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This work presents an evaluation of the impact of physical exercise of the upper limbs in patients with muscular atrophy in the lower limbs by analysis of specific biomarkers.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>It is a cross-sectional study. Patients were recruited using convenience sampling: control group (C: n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12) and two groups of wheelchair users: non-athletes (NAth: n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12) and athletes (Ath: n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->13, professional basketball players). Plasmatic biomarkers analyzed: fibrinogen, TBARS and NO. Comparisons were assessed by one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls Multiple Comparison post-hoc.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Plasma fibrinogen values were not different between Ath (3.67<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.44<!--> <!-->g/L) and NAth (3.44<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.38<!--> <!-->g/L) groups. It was observed difference between fibrinogen levels from both wheelchair user groups (Ath and NAth) when comparing to control group (C: 2.27<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.08<!--> <!-->g/L) and standard values of fibrinogen (1.8<!--> <!-->g/dL–3.1<!--> <!-->g/dL). The TBARS values were not different between the wheelchair users Ath (3.21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.24<!--> <!-->nmol/mL) and NAth (3.66<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.27<!--> <!-->nmol/mL). Independently of practicing physical activity, the TBARS values from both wheelchair users, Ath and Nath, were different when compared to the TBARS values from control group (C: 24.11<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.75<!--> <!-->nmol/mL). The plasma levels of NO were not different among the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Under SCI conditions, the upper body exercise practicing did not alter plasma levels of NO and ROS production neither rheological changes in viscosity indicated by blood clotting studies (fibrinogen levels).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72344,"journal":{"name":"BBA clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.05.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BBA clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214647416300228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aims

This work presents an evaluation of the impact of physical exercise of the upper limbs in patients with muscular atrophy in the lower limbs by analysis of specific biomarkers.

Methodology

It is a cross-sectional study. Patients were recruited using convenience sampling: control group (C: n = 12) and two groups of wheelchair users: non-athletes (NAth: n = 12) and athletes (Ath: n = 13, professional basketball players). Plasmatic biomarkers analyzed: fibrinogen, TBARS and NO. Comparisons were assessed by one-way ANOVA and Newman–Keuls Multiple Comparison post-hoc.

Results

Plasma fibrinogen values were not different between Ath (3.67 ± 0.44 g/L) and NAth (3.44 ± 0.38 g/L) groups. It was observed difference between fibrinogen levels from both wheelchair user groups (Ath and NAth) when comparing to control group (C: 2.27 ± 0.08 g/L) and standard values of fibrinogen (1.8 g/dL–3.1 g/dL). The TBARS values were not different between the wheelchair users Ath (3.21 ± 0.24 nmol/mL) and NAth (3.66 ± 0.27 nmol/mL). Independently of practicing physical activity, the TBARS values from both wheelchair users, Ath and Nath, were different when compared to the TBARS values from control group (C: 24.11 ± 1.75 nmol/mL). The plasma levels of NO were not different among the groups.

Conclusion

Under SCI conditions, the upper body exercise practicing did not alter plasma levels of NO and ROS production neither rheological changes in viscosity indicated by blood clotting studies (fibrinogen levels).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤患者的生化生物标志物不依赖于体育锻炼
目的:本研究通过分析特定的生物标志物,评估上肢体育锻炼对下肢肌肉萎缩患者的影响。方法:本研究为横断面研究。采用方便抽样方法招募患者:对照组(C: n = 12)和两组轮椅使用者:非运动员(NAth: n = 12)和运动员(Ath: n = 13,职业篮球运动员)。分析血浆生物标志物:纤维蛋白原、TBARS和NO。比较采用单因素方差分析和事后Newman-Keuls多重比较进行评估。结果Ath组(3.67±0.44 g/L)与NAth组(3.44±0.38 g/L)血浆纤维蛋白原值差异无统计学意义。观察两组轮椅使用者(Ath组和NAth组)纤维蛋白原水平与对照组(C: 2.27±0.08 g/L)和纤维蛋白原标准值(1.8 g/dL - 3.1 g/dL)的差异。轮椅使用者的TBARS值在Ath组(3.21±0.24 nmol/mL)和NAth组(3.66±0.27 nmol/mL)之间无显著差异。独立于体育锻炼,Ath和Nath轮椅使用者的TBARS值与对照组的TBARS值不同(C: 24.11±1.75 nmol/mL)。各组血浆一氧化氮水平无明显差异。结论在脊髓损伤条件下,上肢运动没有改变血浆NO和ROS的生成水平,也没有改变血液凝固研究显示的粘度流变学变化(纤维蛋白原水平)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Body mass index is associated with region-dependent metabolic reprogramming of adipose tissue Rapid diagnosis and intraoperative margin assessment of human lung cancer with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy Accumulated substancies and calorific capacity in adipose tissue: Physical and chemical clinical trial Abnormal amyloid β42 expression and increased oxidative stress in plasma of CKD patients with cognitive dysfunction: A small scale case control study comparison with Alzheimer's disease Novel panel of protein biomarkers to predict response to bortezomib-containing induction regimens in multiple myeloma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1