Enamel and Dentin Surface Finishing Influence on the Roughness and Microshear Bond Strength of a Lithium Silicate Glass-Ceramic for Laminate Veneers.

International Scholarly Research Notices Pub Date : 2015-09-07 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2015/243615
Carla Castiglia Gonzaga, Ruth Peggy Bravo, Thiago Vinícius Pavelski, Paula Pontes Garcia, Gisele Maria Correr, Denise Piotto Leonardi, Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha, Adilson Yoshio Furuse
{"title":"Enamel and Dentin Surface Finishing Influence on the Roughness and Microshear Bond Strength of a Lithium Silicate Glass-Ceramic for Laminate Veneers.","authors":"Carla Castiglia Gonzaga,&nbsp;Ruth Peggy Bravo,&nbsp;Thiago Vinícius Pavelski,&nbsp;Paula Pontes Garcia,&nbsp;Gisele Maria Correr,&nbsp;Denise Piotto Leonardi,&nbsp;Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha,&nbsp;Adilson Yoshio Furuse","doi":"10.1155/2015/243615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives. This study evaluated the influence of cavity surface finishing with diamond burs of different grit mounted on high-speed turbine and ultrasound on the roughness and microshear bond strength (MBS) of a lithium silicate glass-ceramic to enamel and dentin. Methods. Enamel and dentin specimens were divided into seven groups, according to the type of surface finishing: 1200-grit sandpaper (control), two different brands of medium-grit and fine-grit diamond burs in a high-speed turbine; medium-grit and fine-grit CVD (chemical vapor deposition) tips in an ultrasonic device. Roughness parameters (n = 5) and MSBS to a glass-ceramic (n = 10) were determined. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 5%). Results. Control group showed lower mean roughness readings and groups that used medium-grit diamond burs showed the highest mean roughness values. Regarding MSBS, there was no statistical difference when comparing the groups gritted with the same brand of medium- and fine-grit burs and tips. Conclusions. Cavity surface finishing influenced the roughness parameters and MSBS of a glass-ceramic to enamel and dentin. Medium-grit diamond burs in high-speed turbine showed the highest mean roughness values. Fine-grit CVD tips in ultrasound presented the highest MSBS values for both enamel and dentin. </p>","PeriodicalId":14433,"journal":{"name":"International Scholarly Research Notices","volume":"2015 ","pages":"243615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/243615","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Scholarly Research Notices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/243615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives. This study evaluated the influence of cavity surface finishing with diamond burs of different grit mounted on high-speed turbine and ultrasound on the roughness and microshear bond strength (MBS) of a lithium silicate glass-ceramic to enamel and dentin. Methods. Enamel and dentin specimens were divided into seven groups, according to the type of surface finishing: 1200-grit sandpaper (control), two different brands of medium-grit and fine-grit diamond burs in a high-speed turbine; medium-grit and fine-grit CVD (chemical vapor deposition) tips in an ultrasonic device. Roughness parameters (n = 5) and MSBS to a glass-ceramic (n = 10) were determined. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 5%). Results. Control group showed lower mean roughness readings and groups that used medium-grit diamond burs showed the highest mean roughness values. Regarding MSBS, there was no statistical difference when comparing the groups gritted with the same brand of medium- and fine-grit burs and tips. Conclusions. Cavity surface finishing influenced the roughness parameters and MSBS of a glass-ceramic to enamel and dentin. Medium-grit diamond burs in high-speed turbine showed the highest mean roughness values. Fine-grit CVD tips in ultrasound presented the highest MSBS values for both enamel and dentin.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
釉质和牙本质表面处理对复合贴面用硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷表面粗糙度和微剪切强度的影响。
目标。本研究评估了不同粒度的金刚石毛刺在高速涡轮和超声波上进行空腔表面处理对硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷与牙釉质和牙本质的粗糙度和微剪切结合强度的影响。方法。牙釉质和牙本质样品根据表面抛光的类型分为7组:1200粒砂纸(对照),两种不同品牌的中粒和细粒金刚石毛刺在高速涡轮中;超声波装置中的中粒度和细粒度CVD(化学气相沉积)尖端。测定了玻璃陶瓷(n = 10)的粗糙度参数(n = 5)和MSBS。数据分析采用方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 5%)。结果。对照组的平均粗糙度读数较低,使用中粒度金刚石毛刺的组的平均粗糙度值最高。对于MSBS,使用同一品牌的中、细粒度毛刺和针尖的两组相比,没有统计学差异。结论。空腔表面处理影响玻璃陶瓷对牙本质和牙釉质的表面粗糙度和MSBS。高速涡轮中粗金刚石毛刺的平均粗糙度值最高。细粒CVD针尖对牙本质和牙釉质的MSBS值均最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retracted: Properties of PbS: Ni2+ Nanocrystals in Thin Films by Chemical Bath Deposition Retracted: Necrotizing Fasciitis: Diagnostic Challenges and Current Practices Corrigendum to “Correlation between First and Second Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry and Placental Bed Histopathology” Retracted: Innovative Therapies against Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Retracted: Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1