Transferability study of CHO cell clustering assays for monitoring of pertussis toxin activity in acellular pertussis vaccines.

Q4 Medicine Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Pub Date : 2016-01-01
R Isbrucker, A Daas, L Wagner, A Costanzo
{"title":"Transferability study of CHO cell clustering assays for monitoring of pertussis toxin activity in acellular pertussis vaccines.","authors":"R Isbrucker,&nbsp;A Daas,&nbsp;L Wagner,&nbsp;A Costanzo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current regulations for acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines require that they are tested for the presence of residual or reversion-derived pertussis toxin (PTx) activity using the mouse histamine sensitisation test (HIST). Although a CHO cell clustering assay can be used by manufacturers to verify if sufficient inactivation of the substance has occurred in-process, this assay cannot be used at present for the final product due to the presence of aluminium adjuvants which interfere with mammalian cell cultures. Recently, 2 modified CHO cell clustering assays which accommodate for the adjuvant effects have been proposed as alternatives to the HIST. These modified assays eliminate the adjuvant-induced cytotoxicity either through dilution of the vaccine (called the Direct Method) or by introducing a porous barrier between the adjuvant and the cells (the Indirect Method). Transferability and suitability of these methods for testing of products present on the European market were investigated during a collaborative study organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). Thirteen laboratories participated in this study which included 4 aP-containing vaccines spiked by addition of PTx. This study also assessed the transferability of a standardised CHO cell clustering assay protocol for use with non-adjuvanted PTx preparations. Results showed that the majority of laboratories were able to detect the PTx spike in all 4 vaccines at concentrations of 4 IU/mL or lower using the Indirect Method. This sensitivity is in the range of the theoretical sensitivity of the HIST. The Direct Method however did not show the expected results and would need additional development work.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2015 ","pages":"97-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current regulations for acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines require that they are tested for the presence of residual or reversion-derived pertussis toxin (PTx) activity using the mouse histamine sensitisation test (HIST). Although a CHO cell clustering assay can be used by manufacturers to verify if sufficient inactivation of the substance has occurred in-process, this assay cannot be used at present for the final product due to the presence of aluminium adjuvants which interfere with mammalian cell cultures. Recently, 2 modified CHO cell clustering assays which accommodate for the adjuvant effects have been proposed as alternatives to the HIST. These modified assays eliminate the adjuvant-induced cytotoxicity either through dilution of the vaccine (called the Direct Method) or by introducing a porous barrier between the adjuvant and the cells (the Indirect Method). Transferability and suitability of these methods for testing of products present on the European market were investigated during a collaborative study organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). Thirteen laboratories participated in this study which included 4 aP-containing vaccines spiked by addition of PTx. This study also assessed the transferability of a standardised CHO cell clustering assay protocol for use with non-adjuvanted PTx preparations. Results showed that the majority of laboratories were able to detect the PTx spike in all 4 vaccines at concentrations of 4 IU/mL or lower using the Indirect Method. This sensitivity is in the range of the theoretical sensitivity of the HIST. The Direct Method however did not show the expected results and would need additional development work.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CHO细胞聚类法监测无细胞百日咳疫苗中百日咳毒素活性的可转移性研究。
目前关于无细胞百日咳(aP)疫苗的法规要求使用小鼠组胺致敏试验(HIST)检测它们是否存在残留或逆转性百日咳毒素(PTx)活性。尽管制造商可以使用CHO细胞聚类分析来验证过程中是否发生了物质的充分失活,但由于铝佐剂的存在会干扰哺乳动物细胞培养,因此目前该分析不能用于最终产品。最近,提出了两种适应佐剂作用的改进的CHO细胞聚类试验作为HIST的替代方法。通过稀释疫苗(称为直接法)或在佐剂和细胞之间引入多孔屏障(间接法),这些改良的检测方法消除了佐剂诱导的细胞毒性。欧洲药品和保健质量理事会(EDQM)组织了一项合作研究,调查了这些方法在欧洲市场上检测产品的可转移性和适用性。13个实验室参与了这项研究,其中包括4种添加了PTx的含ap疫苗。本研究还评估了用于非佐剂PTx制剂的标准化CHO细胞聚类分析方案的可转移性。结果表明,大多数实验室能够在4 IU/mL或更低浓度的4种疫苗中检测到PTx尖峰。该灵敏度在HIST的理论灵敏度范围内。然而,直接方法没有显示预期的结果,需要额外的开发工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative study for the establishment of Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation for Human tetanus immunoglobulin batch 2. Collaborative study for the establishment of Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation for Human tetanus immunoglobulin batch 2. Determination of procoagulant activity in human normal immunoglobulin preparations for therapeutic use by FXIa chromogenic assay: Evaluation of test kit sensitivity, reference standard performance and product formulation effects on the FXIa assay. Ph. Eur. testing for histamine and depressor substances using guinea-pigs and cats: the end of an era. Strategy for removal of animal tests for histamine and depressor substances and their vestiges from the Ph. Eur. International collaborative study to assess new stocks of candidate reference preparations to control the level of anti-D in IVIG
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1