The Incidence of Euphoria in Multiple Sclerosis: Artefact of Measure.

IF 2.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis International Pub Date : 2016-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-06-13 DOI:10.1155/2016/5738425
Amy Duncan, Susan Malcolm-Smith, Ozayr Ameen, Mark Solms
{"title":"The Incidence of Euphoria in Multiple Sclerosis: Artefact of Measure.","authors":"Amy Duncan,&nbsp;Susan Malcolm-Smith,&nbsp;Ozayr Ameen,&nbsp;Mark Solms","doi":"10.1155/2016/5738425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. A subgroup of MS patients present with \"euphoria.\" Classical authors describe this symptom as the predominant mood state of these patients, while contemporary authors regard it as rare. Objective. This study aimed to address these discrepancies and investigate the contributions made by varying operational definitions and measurement instruments. Methods. One hundred MS patients and 100 matched controls completed the classical interview of Cottrell and Wilson and the modern Neuropsychiatric Inventory in a once-off interview. Results. The MS group demonstrated high frequencies of euphoria using the classical measure but low frequencies using the contemporary measure and definition. The matched control group demonstrated significantly higher rates than the MS group using the classical measure and lower rates than the MS group using the contemporary measure. Conclusion. The discrepancies in incidence rates of euphoria noted in the literature do not reflect a change in the incidence of euphoria in MS, but rather in the definition and operationalisation of \"euphoria.\" Furthermore, these results highlight the importance of characterising what represents pathological euphoria as well as the need for better definitions and instruments of measure. </p>","PeriodicalId":46096,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2016/5738425","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5738425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background. A subgroup of MS patients present with "euphoria." Classical authors describe this symptom as the predominant mood state of these patients, while contemporary authors regard it as rare. Objective. This study aimed to address these discrepancies and investigate the contributions made by varying operational definitions and measurement instruments. Methods. One hundred MS patients and 100 matched controls completed the classical interview of Cottrell and Wilson and the modern Neuropsychiatric Inventory in a once-off interview. Results. The MS group demonstrated high frequencies of euphoria using the classical measure but low frequencies using the contemporary measure and definition. The matched control group demonstrated significantly higher rates than the MS group using the classical measure and lower rates than the MS group using the contemporary measure. Conclusion. The discrepancies in incidence rates of euphoria noted in the literature do not reflect a change in the incidence of euphoria in MS, but rather in the definition and operationalisation of "euphoria." Furthermore, these results highlight the importance of characterising what represents pathological euphoria as well as the need for better definitions and instruments of measure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症患者欣快感的发生率:测量的人工产物。
背景。一组多发性硬化症患者表现为“欣快感”。古典作家将这种症状描述为这些患者的主要情绪状态,而当代作家认为这是罕见的。目标。本研究旨在解决这些差异,并调查不同的操作定义和测量工具所做的贡献。方法。100名多发性硬化症患者和100名匹配的对照者在一次访谈中完成了Cottrell和Wilson的经典访谈和现代神经精神量表。结果。MS组使用经典测量显示高频率的欣快感,但使用现代测量和定义显示低频率。匹配的对照组显示出明显高于使用经典测量的MS组,低于使用现代测量的MS组。结论。文献中提到的欣快感发生率的差异并不能反映MS中欣快感发生率的变化,而是反映了“欣快感”的定义和操作上的变化。此外,这些结果强调了表征病态欣快的重要性,以及对更好的定义和测量工具的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis International
Multiple Sclerosis International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of multiple sclerosis, including clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, therapeutics, genetics, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, psychology and neurorehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Pulp Sensitivity Testing in Multiple Sclerosis: Disease Duration and Sensory/Motor Associations-A Cross-Sectional Study. Incongruence between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Subjective Reports of Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Focus on Sex Differences Brain Atrophy as an Outcome of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Remitting-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Contributors of Backward Walking in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Physical Therapy for Walking Difficulties in Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1