Local bupivacaine for postoperative pain management in thyroidectomized patients: A prospective and controlled clinical study.

Ulusal cerrahi dergisi Pub Date : 2015-09-01 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.5152/UCD.2015.3138
Ersin Gürkan Dumlu, Mehmet Tokaç, Haydar Öcal, Doğukan Durak, Halil Kara, Mehmet Kılıç, Abdussamed Yalçın
{"title":"Local bupivacaine for postoperative pain management in thyroidectomized patients: A prospective and controlled clinical study.","authors":"Ersin Gürkan Dumlu,&nbsp;Mehmet Tokaç,&nbsp;Haydar Öcal,&nbsp;Doğukan Durak,&nbsp;Halil Kara,&nbsp;Mehmet Kılıç,&nbsp;Abdussamed Yalçın","doi":"10.5152/UCD.2015.3138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the effect of bupivacaine and to compare the routes of administration of bupivacaine in the management of postoperative incision site pain after thyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who were planned for thyroidectomy surgery were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each: Group 1 (control group): standard thyroidectomy surgery without additional intervention; Group 2 (paratracheal infiltration with bupivacaine): following thyroidectomy, 0.25% bupivacaine was applied on the surgical area; Group 3 (subcutaneous infiltration with bupivacaine): following thyroidectomy, 0.25% bupivacaine was injected into the cutaneous, subcutaneous region and fascia of the surgical area. Postoperative pain was evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS) at 1(st), 4(th), and 12(th) hours after thyroidectomy. Total daily requirement for additional analgesia was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of 90 patients was 44.37±13.42 years, and the female:male ratio was 62:28. There was no difference between study groups in terms of age, thyroid volume, TSH and T4 levels. VAS score of patients in paratracheal infiltration with bupivacaine group was significantly lower than control group patients at 1(st), 4(th) and 12(th) hours following thyroidectomy (p=0.030, p=0.033, p=0.039, respectively). The need for analgesics was significantly lower in both paratracheal infiltration and subcutaneous infiltration groups than the control group (86.7%, 83.0%, and 73.3%, respectively, p=0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative local bupivacaine application is effective in decreasing postoperative pain in patients with thyroidectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":90992,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","volume":"32 3","pages":"173-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4970774/pdf/ucd-32-3-173.pdf","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2015.3138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of bupivacaine and to compare the routes of administration of bupivacaine in the management of postoperative incision site pain after thyroidectomy.

Material and methods: Consecutive patients who were planned for thyroidectomy surgery were randomized into three groups of 30 patients each: Group 1 (control group): standard thyroidectomy surgery without additional intervention; Group 2 (paratracheal infiltration with bupivacaine): following thyroidectomy, 0.25% bupivacaine was applied on the surgical area; Group 3 (subcutaneous infiltration with bupivacaine): following thyroidectomy, 0.25% bupivacaine was injected into the cutaneous, subcutaneous region and fascia of the surgical area. Postoperative pain was evaluated by a visual analog scale (VAS) at 1(st), 4(th), and 12(th) hours after thyroidectomy. Total daily requirement for additional analgesia was recorded.

Results: The mean age of 90 patients was 44.37±13.42 years, and the female:male ratio was 62:28. There was no difference between study groups in terms of age, thyroid volume, TSH and T4 levels. VAS score of patients in paratracheal infiltration with bupivacaine group was significantly lower than control group patients at 1(st), 4(th) and 12(th) hours following thyroidectomy (p=0.030, p=0.033, p=0.039, respectively). The need for analgesics was significantly lower in both paratracheal infiltration and subcutaneous infiltration groups than the control group (86.7%, 83.0%, and 73.3%, respectively, p=0.049).

Conclusions: Intraoperative local bupivacaine application is effective in decreasing postoperative pain in patients with thyroidectomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部布比卡因治疗甲状腺切除术患者术后疼痛:一项前瞻性对照临床研究。
目的:评价布比卡因治疗甲状腺切除术后切口疼痛的效果,比较布比卡因的给药途径。材料与方法:将拟行甲状腺切除术的连续患者随机分为三组,每组30例:第一组(对照组):标准甲状腺切除术,不加干预;2组(气管旁布比卡因浸润):甲状腺切除术后,0.25%布比卡因涂抹于手术区;第三组(布比卡因皮下浸润):甲状腺切除术后,在手术区皮肤、皮下和筋膜内注射0.25%的布比卡因。术后疼痛在甲状腺切除术后1(st)、4(th)和12(th)小时通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估。记录每日额外镇痛的总需求量。结果:90例患者平均年龄44.37±13.42岁,男女比例为62:28。在年龄、甲状腺体积、TSH和T4水平方面,研究组之间没有差异。布比卡因气管旁浸润组患者在甲状腺切除术后1(st)、4(th)、12(th) h的VAS评分显著低于对照组(p=0.030、p=0.033、p=0.039)。气管旁浸润组和皮下浸润组镇痛药需求均显著低于对照组(分别为86.7%、83.0%和73.3%,p=0.049)。结论:术中局部应用布比卡因可有效减轻甲状腺切除术患者术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circulating tumor DNA for monitoring colorectal cancer: A prospective observational study to assess the presence of methylated SEPT9 and VIM promoter genes and its role as a biomarker in colorectal cancer management. Synchronous pancreas and gallbladder cancer with concomitant alopecia totalis. The effects of the use of hyoscine-N-butylbromide during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A retrospective study of diagnosis and management of gallbladder perforation: 10-year experience from a tertiary health care centre. Surgery versus no surgery in stage IV gallbladder carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1