Mobile and Wearable Device Features that Matter in Promoting Physical Activity.

Julie B Wang, Janine K Cataldo, Guadalupe X Ayala, Loki Natarajan, Lisa A Cadmus-Bertram, Martha M White, Hala Madanat, Jeanne F Nichols, John P Pierce
{"title":"Mobile and Wearable Device Features that Matter in Promoting Physical Activity.","authors":"Julie B Wang,&nbsp;Janine K Cataldo,&nbsp;Guadalupe X Ayala,&nbsp;Loki Natarajan,&nbsp;Lisa A Cadmus-Bertram,&nbsp;Martha M White,&nbsp;Hala Madanat,&nbsp;Jeanne F Nichols,&nbsp;John P Pierce","doi":"10.7309/jmtm.5.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As wearable sensors/devices become increasingly popular to promote physical activity (PA), research is needed to examine how and which components of these devices people use to increase their PA levels.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>(1) To assess usability and level of engagement with the Fitbit One and daily SMS-based prompts in a 6-week PA intervention, and (2) to examine whether use/ level of engagement with specific intervention components were associated with PA change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed from a randomized controlled trial that compared (1) a wearable sensor/ device (Fitbit One) plus SMS-based PA prompts, and (2) Fitbit One only, among overweight/ obese adults (N = 67). We calculated average scores from Likert-type response items that assessed usability and level of engagement with device features (e.g., tracker, website, mobile app, and SMS-based prompts), and assessed whether such factors were associated with change in steps/day (using Actigraph GT3X+).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported the Fitbit One was easy to use and the tracker helped to be more active. Those who used the Fitbit mobile app (36%) vs. those who did not (64%) had an increase in steps at 6-week follow-up, even after adjusting for previous web/app use: +545 steps/ day (<i>SE</i> = 265) vs. -28 steps/ day (<i>SE</i> = 242) (<i>p</i> = .04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Level of engagement with the Fitbit One, particularly the mobile app, was associated with increased steps. Mobile apps can instantly display summaries of PA performance and could optimize self-regulation to activate change. More research is needed to determine whether such modalities might be cost-effective in future intervention research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":87305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":"2-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7309/jmtm.5.2.2","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7309/jmtm.5.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

Background: As wearable sensors/devices become increasingly popular to promote physical activity (PA), research is needed to examine how and which components of these devices people use to increase their PA levels.

Aims: (1) To assess usability and level of engagement with the Fitbit One and daily SMS-based prompts in a 6-week PA intervention, and (2) to examine whether use/ level of engagement with specific intervention components were associated with PA change.

Methods: Data were analyzed from a randomized controlled trial that compared (1) a wearable sensor/ device (Fitbit One) plus SMS-based PA prompts, and (2) Fitbit One only, among overweight/ obese adults (N = 67). We calculated average scores from Likert-type response items that assessed usability and level of engagement with device features (e.g., tracker, website, mobile app, and SMS-based prompts), and assessed whether such factors were associated with change in steps/day (using Actigraph GT3X+).

Results: Participants reported the Fitbit One was easy to use and the tracker helped to be more active. Those who used the Fitbit mobile app (36%) vs. those who did not (64%) had an increase in steps at 6-week follow-up, even after adjusting for previous web/app use: +545 steps/ day (SE = 265) vs. -28 steps/ day (SE = 242) (p = .04).

Conclusions: Level of engagement with the Fitbit One, particularly the mobile app, was associated with increased steps. Mobile apps can instantly display summaries of PA performance and could optimize self-regulation to activate change. More research is needed to determine whether such modalities might be cost-effective in future intervention research and practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动和可穿戴设备在促进身体活动方面的重要功能。
背景:随着可穿戴传感器/设备在促进身体活动(PA)方面越来越受欢迎,需要研究人们如何以及使用这些设备的哪些组件来增加他们的PA水平。目的:(1)在为期6周的PA干预中评估Fitbit One和每日短信提示的可用性和参与水平;(2)检查特定干预组件的使用/参与水平是否与PA变化相关。方法:对来自一项随机对照试验的数据进行分析,该试验在超重/肥胖成年人(N = 67)中比较(1)可穿戴传感器/设备(Fitbit One)和基于短信的PA提示,以及(2)仅使用Fitbit One。我们计算了李克特式回答项目的平均得分,这些项目评估了可用性和与设备功能(例如,跟踪器、网站、移动应用程序和基于短信的提示)的互动程度,并评估了这些因素是否与每天的步数变化有关(使用Actigraph GT3X+)。结果:参与者报告Fitbit One易于使用,追踪器有助于更活跃。在6周的随访中,使用Fitbit移动应用程序的人(36%)比不使用Fitbit移动应用程序的人(64%)的步数有所增加,即使在调整了之前的网络/应用程序使用情况后:+545步/天(SE = 265)对-28步/天(SE = 242) (p = 0.04)。结论:使用Fitbit One的程度,特别是移动应用程序,与增加的步数有关。移动应用程序可以即时显示PA的表现摘要,并可以优化自我调节以激活变化。需要更多的研究来确定这些模式在未来的干预研究和实践中是否具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among prison system workers in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, 2020. Evaluating Artificial Intelligence and Telemedicine-based Care Models in Dermatology An Affordable Smart Phone Communication System from Highway to Helipad: A Case Series Myanmar is Ready to Engage mHealth Applications for Improved Postoperative Care A Mobile Electronic Record for Lifestyle Coaches in Gestational Diabetes Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1