Ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in dental treatment at a school of dentistry.

The New Zealand dental journal Pub Date : 2016-06-01
J M Broadbent, R F Theodore, L Te Morenga, W M Thomson, P A Brunton
{"title":"Ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in dental treatment at a school of dentistry.","authors":"J M Broadbent,&nbsp;R F Theodore,&nbsp;L Te Morenga,&nbsp;W M Thomson,&nbsp;P A Brunton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Health services should be targeted toward those most in need of health care. Poor oral health disproportionately affects Māori, Pacific Island, and socioeconomically deprived New Zealanders of all ages, and oral health care services should be prioritised to such groups. In New Zealand, free oral health care is available for all children up to the age of 17. On the other hand, adult dental services are provided on a user-pays basis, except for a limited range of basic services for some adults, access to which varies regionally. This study investigated the extent of dental treatment inequalities among patients at New Zealand's only School of Dentistry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were audited for all treatments provided at the University of Otago Faculty of Dentistry from 2006 to 2011 for patients born prior to 1990. Ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in the provision of dental extractions, endodontic treatment, crowns, and preventive care were investigated. Differences were expressed as the odds of having received one or more treatments of that type during the six-year period 2006 to 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analysed for 23,799 individuals, of whom 11,945 (50.2%) were female, 1,285 (5.4%) were Māori and 479 (2.0%) were Pacific, 4,040 (17.0%) were of low socioeconomic status (SES), and 2,681 (11.3%) were beneficiaries or unemployed. After controlling for SES, age, and sex, Māori had 1.8 times greater odds of having had a tooth extracted than NZ European patients, while Pacific Islanders had 2.1 times the odds. Furthermore, after controlling for ethnicity, age, and sex, low-SES patients had 2.4 times greater odds of having had a tooth extracted than high-SES patients, and beneficiaries had 2.9 times the odds. Conversely, these groups were less likely to have had a tooth treated with a crown or endodontics or receive preventive care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing policies call for the reduction of inequalities. There is a need for a strategy to monitor changes in treatment inequality over time which includes improving equity in service care provision. The observed treatment inequalities are likely to be an underestimate of those occurring in private dental practice in New Zealand.</p>","PeriodicalId":76703,"journal":{"name":"The New Zealand dental journal","volume":"112 2","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Zealand dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Health services should be targeted toward those most in need of health care. Poor oral health disproportionately affects Māori, Pacific Island, and socioeconomically deprived New Zealanders of all ages, and oral health care services should be prioritised to such groups. In New Zealand, free oral health care is available for all children up to the age of 17. On the other hand, adult dental services are provided on a user-pays basis, except for a limited range of basic services for some adults, access to which varies regionally. This study investigated the extent of dental treatment inequalities among patients at New Zealand's only School of Dentistry.

Methods: Data were audited for all treatments provided at the University of Otago Faculty of Dentistry from 2006 to 2011 for patients born prior to 1990. Ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in the provision of dental extractions, endodontic treatment, crowns, and preventive care were investigated. Differences were expressed as the odds of having received one or more treatments of that type during the six-year period 2006 to 2011.

Results: Data were analysed for 23,799 individuals, of whom 11,945 (50.2%) were female, 1,285 (5.4%) were Māori and 479 (2.0%) were Pacific, 4,040 (17.0%) were of low socioeconomic status (SES), and 2,681 (11.3%) were beneficiaries or unemployed. After controlling for SES, age, and sex, Māori had 1.8 times greater odds of having had a tooth extracted than NZ European patients, while Pacific Islanders had 2.1 times the odds. Furthermore, after controlling for ethnicity, age, and sex, low-SES patients had 2.4 times greater odds of having had a tooth extracted than high-SES patients, and beneficiaries had 2.9 times the odds. Conversely, these groups were less likely to have had a tooth treated with a crown or endodontics or receive preventive care.

Conclusions: Existing policies call for the reduction of inequalities. There is a need for a strategy to monitor changes in treatment inequality over time which includes improving equity in service care provision. The observed treatment inequalities are likely to be an underestimate of those occurring in private dental practice in New Zealand.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙科学校牙科治疗中的种族和社会经济不平等。
背景和目标:保健服务应以最需要保健的人为对象。口腔健康不良不成比例地影响Māori、太平洋岛和所有年龄段的社会经济贫困的新西兰人,口腔卫生保健服务应优先考虑这些群体。在新西兰,所有17岁以下的儿童都可获得免费口腔保健。另一方面,成人牙科服务是在用户付费的基础上提供的,但一些成年人获得的有限的基本服务因地区而异。这项研究调查了在新西兰唯一的牙科学校的病人之间的牙科治疗不平等的程度。方法:对2006年至2011年在奥塔哥大学牙科学院为1990年之前出生的患者提供的所有治疗数据进行审计。种族和社会经济不平等在提供拔牙,根管治疗,冠,和预防保健进行了调查。差异被表示为在2006年至2011年的六年期间接受过一种或多种治疗的几率。结果:对23,799人的数据进行了分析,其中11,945人(50.2%)为女性,1,285人(5.4%)为Māori, 479人(2.0%)为太平洋人,4,040人(17.0%)为低社会经济地位(SES), 2,681人(11.3%)为受益人或失业者。在控制了社会经济地位、年龄和性别之后,Māori患者拔牙的几率是新西兰欧洲患者的1.8倍,太平洋岛民拔牙的几率是2.1倍。此外,在控制了种族、年龄和性别之后,低社会经济地位患者拔牙的几率是高社会经济地位患者的2.4倍,受益者的几率是2.9倍。相反,这些人不太可能用牙冠或牙髓治疗或接受预防性护理。结论:现有政策要求减少不平等现象。有必要制定一项战略,监测长期以来待遇不平等的变化,其中包括改善服务护理提供方面的公平性。观察到的治疗不平等很可能被低估了那些发生在新西兰的私人牙科诊所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smoking Prevention Research Design Steroid Prophylaxis: The knowledge and practices of New Zealand General Dental Practitioners. An Investigation of the Views of Parents in Otago on Dental Care for Primary School-Aged Children by the Community Oral Health Service Prior to the Introduction of the Hub-Based Clinic System. Final year dental students in New Zealand: Self-reported confidence levels prior to BDS graduation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1