Frequency and distribution of teeth treated by single- and multiple- visit root canal treatment in a Nigerian population by differently skilled operators.

D C Umesi, O A Oremosu, J O Makanjuola, N C Nwachukwu
{"title":"Frequency and distribution of teeth treated by single- and multiple- visit root canal treatment in a Nigerian population by differently skilled operators.","authors":"D C Umesi,&nbsp;O A Oremosu,&nbsp;J O Makanjuola,&nbsp;N C Nwachukwu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single visit root canal treatment (RCT) is being advocated around the world. This study profiles RCT in a Nigerian population and compares pattern of single versus multiple visit RCT to tooth type and skill level of the doctors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective study was carried out on RCT performed in one year by fresh graduates and postgraduate dentists. Records retrieved included patients' sex and age, tooth type, location in the jaw and whether single- or multiple-visit RCT was done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Records of 705 teeth were reviewed, 54.6% belonged to females. Age range was 18-87 years, mean of 31.76 (± 12.31) years. Majority (70.1%) belonged to 20-39 years' age group. Most teeth were located in the maxilla (60.8%) and in posterior regions (73.6%). The most frequently root filled tooth was the mandibular first molar (20.7%) followed by maxillary central incisor (18.4%) then maxillary premolar (12.8%). However, all molars accounted for 47.3%, premolars 26.3% and incisors 25.0%. Canines (1.45%) were least frequently root-filled. Incisors (54.8%) were the teeth most frequently treated in single-visit followed by premolars (28.8%). Most frequently treated by multiple-visit were molars (51.0%). All doctors performed multiple-visit RCT in an approximately equal proportion but a significant percentage of single-visit RCT was carried out by senior doctors (71.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most frequently root filled teeth were mandibular first molars. Teeth most likely to be treated by single-visit RCT were incisors. Appropriate operator skill and experience is important in the decision to perform single-visit RCT. Single-visit RCT is advocated in the developing environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":76278,"journal":{"name":"Odonto-stomatologie tropicale = Tropical dental journal","volume":"39 153","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odonto-stomatologie tropicale = Tropical dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Single visit root canal treatment (RCT) is being advocated around the world. This study profiles RCT in a Nigerian population and compares pattern of single versus multiple visit RCT to tooth type and skill level of the doctors.

Method: A retrospective study was carried out on RCT performed in one year by fresh graduates and postgraduate dentists. Records retrieved included patients' sex and age, tooth type, location in the jaw and whether single- or multiple-visit RCT was done.

Results: Records of 705 teeth were reviewed, 54.6% belonged to females. Age range was 18-87 years, mean of 31.76 (± 12.31) years. Majority (70.1%) belonged to 20-39 years' age group. Most teeth were located in the maxilla (60.8%) and in posterior regions (73.6%). The most frequently root filled tooth was the mandibular first molar (20.7%) followed by maxillary central incisor (18.4%) then maxillary premolar (12.8%). However, all molars accounted for 47.3%, premolars 26.3% and incisors 25.0%. Canines (1.45%) were least frequently root-filled. Incisors (54.8%) were the teeth most frequently treated in single-visit followed by premolars (28.8%). Most frequently treated by multiple-visit were molars (51.0%). All doctors performed multiple-visit RCT in an approximately equal proportion but a significant percentage of single-visit RCT was carried out by senior doctors (71.2%).

Conclusion: The most frequently root filled teeth were mandibular first molars. Teeth most likely to be treated by single-visit RCT were incisors. Appropriate operator skill and experience is important in the decision to perform single-visit RCT. Single-visit RCT is advocated in the developing environment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚人口中由不同技术操作员进行单次和多次访问根管治疗的牙齿的频率和分布。
背景:单次根管治疗(RCT)在世界范围内被提倡。本研究概述了尼日利亚人口中的随机对照试验,并比较了单次和多次就诊随机对照试验的模式与医生的牙齿类型和技能水平。方法:对一年内应届毕业生和牙科研究生的随机对照试验进行回顾性研究。检索到的记录包括患者的性别和年龄、牙齿类型、下颌位置以及是否进行了单次或多次访问RCT。结果:检出705颗牙,其中女性占54.6%。年龄18 ~ 87岁,平均31.76(±12.31)岁。大多数(70.1%)属于20-39岁年龄组。大多数牙齿位于上颌骨(60.8%)和后牙区(73.6%)。上颌中切牙次之(18.4%),上颌前磨牙次之(12.8%)。所有臼齿占47.3%,前臼齿占26.3%,门齿占25.0%。犬科动物(1.45%)最不常被根填满。单次就诊最多的是门牙(54.8%),其次是前磨牙(28.8%)。多次就诊最多的是磨牙(51.0%)。所有医生进行多次就诊RCT的比例大致相等,但高级医生进行单次就诊RCT的比例很大(71.2%)。结论:下颌第一磨牙是最常见的根补牙。用单次随机对照试验治疗最多的牙齿是门牙。在决定是否进行单次随机对照试验时,适当的操作人员技能和经验很重要。在发展中环境中提倡单次随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Odontogenic myxoma of the maxilla: report of a case]. [Treatment management of a case of class I bialveolar protrusion with mouth breathing]. [Immediate full removable dentures. A clinical reality of oral medicine]. [Fortuitous discovery of a Stafne bone cavity in the Cone Beam CT sialography]. Ebola haemorrhagic fever and Nigerian dental healthcare providers - knowledge of the disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1