Comparison of Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets Bonded with Conventional and High-Power LED Light Curing Units.

Javad Chalipa, Yasamin Farajzadeh Jalali, Fatemeh Gorjizadeh, Pedram Baghaeian, Mohammad Hashem Hoseini, Omid Mortezai
{"title":"Comparison of Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets Bonded with Conventional and High-Power LED Light Curing Units.","authors":"Javad Chalipa, Yasamin Farajzadeh Jalali, Fatemeh Gorjizadeh, Pedram Baghaeian, Mohammad Hashem Hoseini, Omid Mortezai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of conventional and high-power light emitting diode (LED) light curing units on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets to tooth surface.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty sound bovine maxillary central incisors were used for the study. The teeth were divided into four groups (n=10). Teeth surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds. After applying a uniform layer of adhesive primer on the etched enamel, composite was placed on the base of brackets. The samples were light cured according to the manufacturer's instructions and thermocycled. The SBS was measured. The failure mode was scored using the adhesive remnant index (ARI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean SBS of samples in groups A (high-power LED, metal bracket), B (high-power LED, ceramic bracket), C (conventional LED, metal bracket) and D (conventional LED, ceramic bracket) was 23.1±3.69, 10.7±2.06, 24.92±6.37 and 10.74±3.18MPa, respectively. The interaction effect of type of LED unit (high-power/conventional) and bracket type on SBS was not statistically significant (P=0.483). In general, type of LED unit did not affect SBS. Type of bracket significantly affected SBS (P<0.001). The ARI score was not significantly influenced by the interaction between the type of LED unit and bracket.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The obtained SBS is the same for both bracket types by use of high-power and conventional LED light curing units. Regardless of the type of LED unit, SBS of ceramic brackets was significantly lower than that of metal brackets.</p>","PeriodicalId":30286,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of conventional and high-power light emitting diode (LED) light curing units on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets to tooth surface.

Materials and methods: Forty sound bovine maxillary central incisors were used for the study. The teeth were divided into four groups (n=10). Teeth surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds. After applying a uniform layer of adhesive primer on the etched enamel, composite was placed on the base of brackets. The samples were light cured according to the manufacturer's instructions and thermocycled. The SBS was measured. The failure mode was scored using the adhesive remnant index (ARI).

Results: The mean SBS of samples in groups A (high-power LED, metal bracket), B (high-power LED, ceramic bracket), C (conventional LED, metal bracket) and D (conventional LED, ceramic bracket) was 23.1±3.69, 10.7±2.06, 24.92±6.37 and 10.74±3.18MPa, respectively. The interaction effect of type of LED unit (high-power/conventional) and bracket type on SBS was not statistically significant (P=0.483). In general, type of LED unit did not affect SBS. Type of bracket significantly affected SBS (P<0.001). The ARI score was not significantly influenced by the interaction between the type of LED unit and bracket.

Conclusions: The obtained SBS is the same for both bracket types by use of high-power and conventional LED light curing units. Regardless of the type of LED unit, SBS of ceramic brackets was significantly lower than that of metal brackets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用传统光固化装置和高功率 LED 光固化装置粘接金属和陶瓷牙托的粘接强度比较
研究目的本研究旨在评估传统和高功率发光二极管(LED)光固化装置对金属和陶瓷托槽与牙齿表面的剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响:研究使用了 40 颗健全的牛上颌中切牙。这些牙齿被分为四组(n=10)。牙齿表面用 37% 的磷酸腐蚀 20 秒钟。在蚀刻的珐琅质上均匀涂上一层粘合剂底漆后,将复合材料置于托槽基底。按照制造商的说明对样品进行光固化和热循环。测量 SBS。使用残余粘合剂指数(ARI)对失效模式进行评分:A 组(大功率 LED,金属支架)、B 组(大功率 LED,陶瓷支架)、C 组(传统 LED,金属支架)和 D 组(传统 LED,陶瓷支架)样品的平均 SBS 分别为 23.1±3.69、10.7±2.06、24.92±6.37 和 10.74±3.18MPa。LED 装置类型(大功率/传统)和托槽类型对 SBS 的交互效应无统计学意义(P=0.483)。总体而言,LED 装置类型对 SBS 没有影响。托槽类型对 SBS 有明显影响(PConclusions:使用大功率和传统 LED 光固化装置,两种托槽类型获得的 SBS 是相同的。无论 LED 装置的类型如何,陶瓷托槽的 SBS 都明显低于金属托槽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Polymerization Shrinkage of Five Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Comparison with a Conventional Composite Resin. Effect of Storage Time of a Ceramic Primer on Microshear Bond Strength to Zirconia. Evaluation of the Effect of MTAD on Expression of Enterococcus faecalis Virulence Factors Considering the Role of Different Obturating Materials. Extraskeletal Ewing Sarcoma: Report of an Extremely Rare Case in Temporal Region. Evaluation of the Prevalence of Temporomandibular Joint Involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1