Diagnostic Accuracy of the Overlapping Infinity Loops, Wire Cube, and Clock Drawing Tests for Cognitive Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.

Q1 Neuroscience International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-01-31 DOI:10.1155/2017/5289239
Thammanard Charernboon
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of the Overlapping Infinity Loops, Wire Cube, and Clock Drawing Tests for Cognitive Impairment in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.","authors":"Thammanard Charernboon","doi":"10.1155/2017/5289239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the overlapping infinity loops, wire cube, and clock drawing tests (CDT) in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. <i>Method</i>. The participants were 60 normal controls (NC), 35 patients with MCI, and 47 patients with mild dementia. <i>Results</i>. The results illustrate that infinity loops, cube, or CDT were not able to discriminate between NC and MCI groups. In dementia detection, the CDT had the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 76.6% and specificity 87.4%) followed by infinity loops (sensitivity 63.8% and specificity 91.6%) and cube (sensitivity 93.6% and specificity 46.3%). <i>Conclusion</i>. This study demonstrates that the three drawing tests are sensitive detectors of dementia but not MCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13802,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"2017 ","pages":"5289239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5289239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the overlapping infinity loops, wire cube, and clock drawing tests (CDT) in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Method. The participants were 60 normal controls (NC), 35 patients with MCI, and 47 patients with mild dementia. Results. The results illustrate that infinity loops, cube, or CDT were not able to discriminate between NC and MCI groups. In dementia detection, the CDT had the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 76.6% and specificity 87.4%) followed by infinity loops (sensitivity 63.8% and specificity 91.6%) and cube (sensitivity 93.6% and specificity 46.3%). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the three drawing tests are sensitive detectors of dementia but not MCI.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重叠无限循环、线立方体和时钟绘制测试对轻度认知障碍和痴呆症认知障碍的诊断准确性。
研究目的研究重叠无穷环、线立方和时钟绘图测试(CDT)在检测轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症方面的诊断准确性。测试方法参与者包括 60 名正常对照组(NC)、35 名 MCI 患者和 47 名轻度痴呆患者。结果结果表明,无穷环、立方体或 CDT 无法区分 NC 组和 MCI 组。在痴呆症检测中,CDT 的诊断准确率最高(灵敏度为 76.6%,特异度为 87.4%),其次是无穷环(灵敏度为 63.8%,特异度为 91.6%)和立方体(灵敏度为 93.6%,特异度为 46.3%)。结论这项研究表明,三种绘画测试都能灵敏地检测出痴呆症,但不能检测出 MCI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inflammatory Manifestations Associated With Gut Dysbiosis in Alzheimer's Disease. Advancements and Challenges in Antiamyloid Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Novel Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease: Plasma Neurofilament Light and Cerebrospinal Fluid In Silico Investigation of Novel Compounds as Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Diseases In Silico Investigation of Novel Compounds as Inhibitors of Acetylcholinesterase Enzyme for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1