Single versus two visits with 1-week intracanal calcium hydroxide medication for endodontic treatment: One-year post-treatment results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Q1 Dentistry European Journal of Oral Implantology Pub Date : 2017-01-01
Federica Fonzar, Aniello Mollo, Mauro Venturi, Pierpaolo Pini, Riccardo Fabian Fonzar, Anna Trullenque-Eriksson, Marco Esposito
{"title":"Single versus two visits with 1-week intracanal calcium hydroxide medication for endodontic treatment: One-year post-treatment results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Federica Fonzar,&nbsp;Aniello Mollo,&nbsp;Mauro Venturi,&nbsp;Pierpaolo Pini,&nbsp;Riccardo Fabian Fonzar,&nbsp;Anna Trullenque-Eriksson,&nbsp;Marco Esposito","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether it is more effective to complete endodontic treatment in a single visit or in two visits with 1-week intracanal calcium hydroxide medication in symptomatic teeth and teeth with periapical lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and ninety-nine patients, with one symptomatic tooth or a tooth with a periapical lesion, were randomised, according to a parallel group design, to receive a complete endodontic treatment in a single visit (99 patients) or in two visits with 1-week intracanal calcium hydroxide medication (100 patients), at two centres. Patients were followed for up to 1 year post-treatment and the outcome measures were tooth loss, radiographic healing, any complication, post-treatment pain and amount of painkillers used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients dropped out from the single-visit and ten patients from the two-visit group (all patients from one centre only). One patient lost his tooth from the single-visit and two patients from the two-visit group (difference in proportion = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.03; P = 0.619). Five single-visit patients and nine two-visit patients experienced one complication each (difference in proportion = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.03; P = 0.278). There were no statistically significant differences in tooth loss and complications. One year after treatment, complete radiographic healing was observed in 22 patients of the single-visit group and in 19 patients of the two-visit group; improvement in 43 patients of the single-visit group and in 54 patients of the two-visit group; and no changes/worsening in 24 patients of the single-visit group and in 15 patients of the two-visit group. There were no statistically significant differences in radiographic healing between the two groups (P = 0.509). Pre-treatment pain was reported by 68 single-visit patients and by 68 two-visit patients; 1-week post-treatment pain was reported by 27 single-visit patients and by 46 two-visit patients, and 2-week post-treatment pain was reported by 2 single-visit patients and 11 two-visit patients. For the first week, an average of 0.53 ± 1.23 tablets was taken by single-visit patients and 1.44 ± 3.32 tablets by two-visit patients. For the second week, no single-visit patients needed tablets and in the two-visit group the average was 0.37 ± 1.72 tablets. Patients of the two-visits group had statistically significant more post-treatment pain at 1 (P = 0.002) and 2 weeks (P = 0.011), and took more ibuprofen tablets at 1 (difference = -0.92; 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.21; P = 0.011) and 2 weeks after treatment (difference = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.03; P = 0.033), than in patients treated in a single visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One year after treatment, both groups achieved similar clinical results; however, patients endodontically treated in a single visit suffered less postoperative pain and took less analgesics than patients treated in two visits, therefore a single-visit treatment should be recommended. Conflict-of-interest statement: This trial was self-funded and the authors have no conflict of interests to declare, however, rotary instruments were kindly provided by Sweden & Martina, Due Carrare PD, Italy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49259,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"10 1","pages":"29-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether it is more effective to complete endodontic treatment in a single visit or in two visits with 1-week intracanal calcium hydroxide medication in symptomatic teeth and teeth with periapical lesions.

Materials and methods: One hundred and ninety-nine patients, with one symptomatic tooth or a tooth with a periapical lesion, were randomised, according to a parallel group design, to receive a complete endodontic treatment in a single visit (99 patients) or in two visits with 1-week intracanal calcium hydroxide medication (100 patients), at two centres. Patients were followed for up to 1 year post-treatment and the outcome measures were tooth loss, radiographic healing, any complication, post-treatment pain and amount of painkillers used.

Results: Seven patients dropped out from the single-visit and ten patients from the two-visit group (all patients from one centre only). One patient lost his tooth from the single-visit and two patients from the two-visit group (difference in proportion = -0.01; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.03; P = 0.619). Five single-visit patients and nine two-visit patients experienced one complication each (difference in proportion = -0.05; 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.03; P = 0.278). There were no statistically significant differences in tooth loss and complications. One year after treatment, complete radiographic healing was observed in 22 patients of the single-visit group and in 19 patients of the two-visit group; improvement in 43 patients of the single-visit group and in 54 patients of the two-visit group; and no changes/worsening in 24 patients of the single-visit group and in 15 patients of the two-visit group. There were no statistically significant differences in radiographic healing between the two groups (P = 0.509). Pre-treatment pain was reported by 68 single-visit patients and by 68 two-visit patients; 1-week post-treatment pain was reported by 27 single-visit patients and by 46 two-visit patients, and 2-week post-treatment pain was reported by 2 single-visit patients and 11 two-visit patients. For the first week, an average of 0.53 ± 1.23 tablets was taken by single-visit patients and 1.44 ± 3.32 tablets by two-visit patients. For the second week, no single-visit patients needed tablets and in the two-visit group the average was 0.37 ± 1.72 tablets. Patients of the two-visits group had statistically significant more post-treatment pain at 1 (P = 0.002) and 2 weeks (P = 0.011), and took more ibuprofen tablets at 1 (difference = -0.92; 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.21; P = 0.011) and 2 weeks after treatment (difference = -0.37; 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.03; P = 0.033), than in patients treated in a single visit.

Conclusions: One year after treatment, both groups achieved similar clinical results; however, patients endodontically treated in a single visit suffered less postoperative pain and took less analgesics than patients treated in two visits, therefore a single-visit treatment should be recommended. Conflict-of-interest statement: This trial was self-funded and the authors have no conflict of interests to declare, however, rotary instruments were kindly provided by Sweden & Martina, Due Carrare PD, Italy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1周管内氢氧化钙治疗根管治疗的单次和两次就诊:一项多中心随机对照试验治疗后一年的结果。
目的:评价对有症状的牙齿和有根尖周病变的牙齿进行1周内氢氧化钙治疗,单次就诊和两次就诊孰优孰劣。材料和方法:根据平行组设计,199名患者,其中一颗有症状的牙齿或一颗有根尖周病变的牙齿,被随机分组,在两个中心接受一次治疗(99例)或两次治疗(100例),接受为期1周的管内氢氧化钙药物治疗。治疗后随访1年,观察患者牙齿脱落、影像学愈合、并发症、治疗后疼痛和止痛药用量。结果:7例患者从单次就诊组退出,10例患者从两次就诊组退出(所有患者仅来自一个中心)。单次访牙组1例,两次访牙组2例(比例差异= -0.01;95% CI: -0.05 ~ 0.03;p = 0.619)。5例单次就诊患者和9例二次就诊患者各出现1个并发症(比例差异= -0.05;95% CI: -0.12 ~ 0.03;p = 0.278)。两组在牙齿脱落及并发症方面差异无统计学意义。治疗1年后,单次访视组22例,两次访视组19例,影像学完全愈合;单次就诊组改善43例,两次就诊组改善54例;单次访视组24例患者和两次访视组15例患者无变化/恶化。两组放射治疗愈合无统计学差异(P = 0.509)。68例单次就诊患者和68例两次就诊患者报告了治疗前疼痛;治疗后1周有27例患者单次就诊,46例患者两次就诊,治疗后2周有2例患者单次就诊,11例患者两次就诊。第一周,单次就诊患者平均服用0.53±1.23片,两次就诊患者平均服用1.44±3.32片。第二周,无单次就诊患者需要服药,两次就诊组平均服药0.37±1.72片。两次就诊组患者在治疗后1周(P = 0.002)和2周(P = 0.011)疼痛明显增加,治疗后1周服用布洛芬片剂较多(P = -0.92;95% CI: -1.62 ~ -0.21;P = 0.011)和治疗后2周(差异= -0.37;95% CI: -0.72 ~ -0.03;P = 0.033),高于单次就诊的患者。结论:治疗1年后,两组临床疗效相近;然而,与两次就诊的患者相比,一次就诊的患者术后疼痛更少,服用的镇痛药也更少,因此应推荐一次就诊。利益冲突声明:本试验自费,作者无利益冲突声明,但旋转仪器由瑞典和Martina, Due Carrare PD,意大利提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Implantology
European Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.35
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Immediate loading of fixed prostheses in fully edentulous jaws - 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study. Research in focus. Dental implants with internal versus external connections: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial. Research in focus. Immediate, early (6 weeks) and delayed loading (3 months) of single, partial and full fixed implant supported prostheses: 1-year post-loading data from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1