Dutch taboo norms.

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI:10.3758/s13428-017-0890-x
Sander A Roest, Tessa A Visser, René Zeelenberg
{"title":"Dutch taboo norms.","authors":"Sander A Roest,&nbsp;Tessa A Visser,&nbsp;René Zeelenberg","doi":"10.3758/s13428-017-0890-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article provides norms for general taboo, personal taboo, insult, valence, and arousal for 672 Dutch words, including 202 taboo words. Norms were collected using a 7-point Likert scale and based on ratings by psychology students from the Erasmus University Rotterdam in The Netherlands. The sample consisted of 87 psychology students (58 females, 29 males). We obtained high reliability based on split-half analyses. Our norms show high correlations with arousal and valence ratings collected by another Dutch word-norms study (Moors et al.,, Behavior Research Methods, 45, 169-177, 2013). Our results show that the previously found quadratic relation (i.e., U-shaped pattern) between valence and arousal also holds when only taboo words are considered. Additionally, words rated high on taboo tended to be rated low on valence, but some words related to sex rated high on both taboo and valence. Words that rated high on taboo rated high on insult, again with the exception of words related to sex many of which rated low on insult. Finally, words rated high on taboo and insult rated high on arousal. The Dutch Taboo Norms (DTN) database is a useful tool for researchers interested in the effects of taboo words on cognitive processing. The data associated with this paper can be accessed via the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/vk782/ ).</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"50 2","pages":"630-641"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3758/s13428-017-0890-x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0890-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article provides norms for general taboo, personal taboo, insult, valence, and arousal for 672 Dutch words, including 202 taboo words. Norms were collected using a 7-point Likert scale and based on ratings by psychology students from the Erasmus University Rotterdam in The Netherlands. The sample consisted of 87 psychology students (58 females, 29 males). We obtained high reliability based on split-half analyses. Our norms show high correlations with arousal and valence ratings collected by another Dutch word-norms study (Moors et al.,, Behavior Research Methods, 45, 169-177, 2013). Our results show that the previously found quadratic relation (i.e., U-shaped pattern) between valence and arousal also holds when only taboo words are considered. Additionally, words rated high on taboo tended to be rated low on valence, but some words related to sex rated high on both taboo and valence. Words that rated high on taboo rated high on insult, again with the exception of words related to sex many of which rated low on insult. Finally, words rated high on taboo and insult rated high on arousal. The Dutch Taboo Norms (DTN) database is a useful tool for researchers interested in the effects of taboo words on cognitive processing. The data associated with this paper can be accessed via the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/vk782/ ).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰人的禁忌规范。
本文给出了672个荷兰语词汇的一般禁忌语、个人禁忌语、侮辱语、情态语和唤醒语的规范,其中包括202个禁忌语。标准是根据荷兰鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯大学心理学专业学生的评分,采用7分李克特量表收集的。样本包括87名心理学专业的学生(58名女性,29名男性)。通过对半分析,获得了较高的可靠性。我们的规范与另一项荷兰单词规范研究收集的唤醒和效价评级高度相关(Moors et al., Behavior Research Methods, 45,169 -177, 2013)。我们的研究结果表明,当只考虑禁忌语时,效价和唤醒之间的二次关系(即u型模式)也成立。此外,在禁忌词上得分高的词往往在效价上得分低,但一些与性有关的词在禁忌和效价上都得分高。那些被认为是禁忌的词汇被认为是侮辱性的,同样,与性有关的词汇被认为是侮辱性的,其中许多被认为是侮辱性的。最后,“禁忌”和“侮辱”这两个词的“唤起”程度都很高。荷兰禁忌规范(DTN)数据库对于研究禁忌语对认知加工的影响的研究者来说是一个有用的工具。与本文相关的数据可通过开放科学框架(https://osf.io/vk782/)访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Testing for group differences in multilevel vector autoregressive models. Distribution-free Bayesian analyses with the DFBA statistical package. Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages. Open-access network science: Investigating phonological similarity networks based on the SUBTLEX-US lexicon. Survey measures of metacognitive monitoring are often false.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1