Issues Confronting Rural Pharmacies after a Decade of Medicare Part D.

Q2 Medicine Rural policy brief Pub Date : 2017-04-01
Fred Ullrich, Abiodun Salako, Keith Mueller
{"title":"Issues Confronting Rural Pharmacies after a Decade of Medicare Part D.","authors":"Fred Ullrich,&nbsp;Abiodun Salako,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. The RUPRI Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis has been monitoring the status of rural independent pharmacies since the implementation of Medicare Part D in 2005. After a decade of Part D, we reassess in this brief the issues that concern rural pharmacies and may ultimately challenge their provision of services. This reassessment is based on survey responses from rural pharmacists. Key Findings: (1) Rural pharmacists indicated that two challenges--direct and indirect remuneration (DIR) fees, and delayed maximum allowable cost (MAC) adjustment--ranked highest on scales of both magnitude and immediacy. Nearly eighty (79.8) percent of respondents reported DIR fees as a very large magnitude challenge, with 83.3 percent reporting this as a very immediate challenge. Seventy-eight percent of respondents reported MACs not being updated quickly enough to reflect changes in wholesale drug costs as a very large magnitude challenge, with 79.7 percent indicating it as a very immediate challenge. (2) Medicare Part D continues to be a concern for rural pharmacies--58.8 percent of pharmacists said being an out-of-network pharmacy for Part D plans was a very large magnitude challenge (an additional 29.0 percent said large magnitude) and 60.5 percent said it was a very immediate challenge (an additional 28.1 percent said moderately immediate). (3) Pharmacy staffing, competition from pharmacy chains, and contracts for services for Medicaid patients were less likely to be reported as significant or immediate challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2017 3","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural policy brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. The RUPRI Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis has been monitoring the status of rural independent pharmacies since the implementation of Medicare Part D in 2005. After a decade of Part D, we reassess in this brief the issues that concern rural pharmacies and may ultimately challenge their provision of services. This reassessment is based on survey responses from rural pharmacists. Key Findings: (1) Rural pharmacists indicated that two challenges--direct and indirect remuneration (DIR) fees, and delayed maximum allowable cost (MAC) adjustment--ranked highest on scales of both magnitude and immediacy. Nearly eighty (79.8) percent of respondents reported DIR fees as a very large magnitude challenge, with 83.3 percent reporting this as a very immediate challenge. Seventy-eight percent of respondents reported MACs not being updated quickly enough to reflect changes in wholesale drug costs as a very large magnitude challenge, with 79.7 percent indicating it as a very immediate challenge. (2) Medicare Part D continues to be a concern for rural pharmacies--58.8 percent of pharmacists said being an out-of-network pharmacy for Part D plans was a very large magnitude challenge (an additional 29.0 percent said large magnitude) and 60.5 percent said it was a very immediate challenge (an additional 28.1 percent said moderately immediate). (3) Pharmacy staffing, competition from pharmacy chains, and contracts for services for Medicaid patients were less likely to be reported as significant or immediate challenges.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保险D部分实施十年后农村药房面临的问题。
目的。RUPRI农村卫生政策分析中心自2005年实施医疗保险D部分以来一直在监测农村独立药房的状况。在D部分的十年之后,我们在本简报中重新评估了与农村药房有关的问题,并可能最终挑战他们提供的服务。这一重新评估是基于对农村药剂师的调查反馈。主要发现:(1)农村药师表示,直接和间接报酬(DIR)费用和延迟的最大允许成本(MAC)调整这两项挑战在规模和紧迫性上都排名最高。近80%(79.8%)的受访者认为DIR费用是一个非常大的挑战,83.3%的受访者认为这是一个非常紧迫的挑战。78%的受访者表示,药品价格指标的更新速度不够快,无法反映药品批发成本的变化,这是一个非常大的挑战,79.7%的受访者表示这是一个非常紧迫的挑战。(2)医疗保险D部分仍然是农村药房关注的问题——58.8%的药剂师表示,作为D部分计划的网络外药房是一个非常大的挑战(另外29.0%的药剂师表示大的挑战),60.5%的药剂师表示这是一个非常直接的挑战(另外28.1%的药剂师表示中等直接)。(3)药房人员配备、来自连锁药店的竞争以及医疗补助患者的服务合同不太可能被认为是重大或紧迫的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural policy brief
Rural policy brief Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Rural and Urban Medicare Advantage Beneficiary Characteristics. Changes to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System Pertinent to Small and Rural Practices, 2018. Trends in Hospital System Affiliation, 2007-2016. Health Insurance Marketplaces: Issuer Participation and Premium Trends in Rural Places, 2018. Spread of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations in Rural America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1