The relationship between area deprivation and prescription of long-acting reversible contraception in women of reproductive age in Lothian, Scotland, UK.

Q Medicine Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Pub Date : 2017-10-01 Epub Date: 2017-05-04 DOI:10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101553
Catherine Rachel Morgan, Hanhua Liu
{"title":"The relationship between area deprivation and prescription of long-acting reversible contraception in women of reproductive age in Lothian, Scotland, UK.","authors":"Catherine Rachel Morgan,&nbsp;Hanhua Liu","doi":"10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reducing unplanned pregnancy in Scotland is a key government objective. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is a cost-effective way to reduce unintended pregnancy. Abortion and teenage pregnancy rates are highest in the most deprived areas. One possible explanation could be contraceptive prescribing inequality. This study examined the relationship between area deprivation measured by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and LARC prescription.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Scottish electronic prescribing data from primary care and sexual and reproductive health clinics, this study analysed female Lothian residents with a valid postcode aged 16-49 years who received a contraceptive prescription from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2014. Prescription of LARC (intrauterine, implant or injectable contraceptive) compared with non-LARC (oral pill, patch, ring or diaphragm) was examined. Logistic regression was performed adjusting for age group and prescription location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 150 women were included; 21.1% of prescriptions were LARC and 15.3% vLARC (intrauterine method or implant). Women residing in the most deprived quintile (Q1) and prescribed contraception received a significantly higher proportion of LARC than quintiles 2-5 (Q2-5). Odds ratios compared with Q1 were: Q2 0.86, Q3 0.77, Q4 0.59 and Q5 0.51. Women in quintile 1 were also significantly more likely to receive vLARC than quintiles 2-5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women in the most deprived quintile in Lothian who are prescribed contraception are significantly more likely to receive LARC and vLARC compared with women in less deprived quintiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":15734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"281-288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101553","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Reducing unplanned pregnancy in Scotland is a key government objective. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is a cost-effective way to reduce unintended pregnancy. Abortion and teenage pregnancy rates are highest in the most deprived areas. One possible explanation could be contraceptive prescribing inequality. This study examined the relationship between area deprivation measured by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and LARC prescription.

Methods: Using Scottish electronic prescribing data from primary care and sexual and reproductive health clinics, this study analysed female Lothian residents with a valid postcode aged 16-49 years who received a contraceptive prescription from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2014. Prescription of LARC (intrauterine, implant or injectable contraceptive) compared with non-LARC (oral pill, patch, ring or diaphragm) was examined. Logistic regression was performed adjusting for age group and prescription location.

Results: A total of 90 150 women were included; 21.1% of prescriptions were LARC and 15.3% vLARC (intrauterine method or implant). Women residing in the most deprived quintile (Q1) and prescribed contraception received a significantly higher proportion of LARC than quintiles 2-5 (Q2-5). Odds ratios compared with Q1 were: Q2 0.86, Q3 0.77, Q4 0.59 and Q5 0.51. Women in quintile 1 were also significantly more likely to receive vLARC than quintiles 2-5.

Conclusion: Women in the most deprived quintile in Lothian who are prescribed contraception are significantly more likely to receive LARC and vLARC compared with women in less deprived quintiles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国苏格兰洛锡安地区育龄妇女面积剥夺与长效可逆避孕处方的关系
背景:减少苏格兰的意外怀孕是政府的一个关键目标。长效可逆避孕(LARC)是减少意外怀孕的一种经济有效的方法。堕胎和少女怀孕率在最贫困地区是最高的。一个可能的解释是避孕处方的不平等。本研究考察了由苏格兰多重剥夺指数测量的区域剥夺与LARC处方之间的关系。方法:利用苏格兰初级保健和性与生殖健康诊所的电子处方数据,本研究分析了2012年4月1日至2014年3月31日期间收到避孕处方的洛锡安女性居民,其有效邮政编码为16-49岁。比较LARC(宫内避孕、植入或注射避孕)与非LARC(口服避孕药、贴片、避孕环或避孕环)的处方。对年龄组和处方地点进行Logistic回归校正。结果:共纳入90 150名妇女;处方中有21.1%为LARC, 15.3%为vLARC(宫内法或植入物)。生活在最贫困五分之一(Q1)和处方避孕的妇女获得LARC的比例明显高于五分之一(Q2-5)。与Q1相比,比值比为:Q2 0.86, Q3 0.77, Q4 0.59, Q5 0.51。1分位数的妇女接受vLARC的可能性也明显高于2-5分位数的妇女。结论:洛锡安最贫困的五分之一妇女在处方避孕中接受LARC和vLARC的可能性明显高于贫困程度较低的五分之一妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.84
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The trading of Professional, Managerial & Healthcare Publications Ltd has been transferred to its parent company, Keyways Publishing Ltd.
期刊最新文献
The Case of Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (Abt-Letterer-Siwe Disease) in Twin Girls Multifetal Gestations Planning Methods in Ecuador’s Indigenous People Reproductive Health and Family Planning Services in Africa: Looking beyond Individual and Household Factors The Role of Information Technologies in Natural Family Planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1