Realtime ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy in emergency setting: the glass ceiling has been broken.

Disaster and military medicine Pub Date : 2017-11-28 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40696-017-0035-x
Parli Raghavan Ravi, M N Vijai, Sachin Shouche
{"title":"Realtime ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy in emergency setting: the glass ceiling has been broken.","authors":"Parli Raghavan Ravi,&nbsp;M N Vijai,&nbsp;Sachin Shouche","doi":"10.1186/s40696-017-0035-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy (USPCT) has become a routine practice in critical care units. Its safety and superiority over conventional percutaneous tracheostomy and bronchoscopic guided PCT is proven to be non-inferior in elective cases. However its role in emergency percutaneous tracheostomy has never been studied, since percutaneous tracheostomy itself remains an enigma in accessing emergency airway. There is no report of use of ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy in emergency setting so far in the literature. We report our early experience with USPCT in emergency setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen adult patients who required access to an emergency surgical airway after failure to accomplish emergency oro-tracheal intubation were the study population. Their airway was accessed by USPCT. Recorded data included clinical and demographic data including time taken to perform the procedure and complications. Short term and long term follow ups for a period of 2 years were done for the survivors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve male and four female patients underwent the procedure and the average time of the procedure was 3.6 min with no failures nor conversions to surgical tracheostomy and no complications. The average oxygen saturation was 86% and average Glasgow coma scale was 8.4. This time period included the oxygen insufflation time. 10 patients were decannulated while six patients died due to the pathology of the disease itself. There were no complications in either short term or long term follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>USPCT has a definitive role in emergency both in trauma and non-trauma setting. It is safe, feasible and faster in experienced hands. Use of USPCT in emergency setting has further narrowed the list of contraindications of percutaneous tracheostomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":91863,"journal":{"name":"Disaster and military medicine","volume":"3 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40696-017-0035-x","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster and military medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40696-017-0035-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: In recent years ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy (USPCT) has become a routine practice in critical care units. Its safety and superiority over conventional percutaneous tracheostomy and bronchoscopic guided PCT is proven to be non-inferior in elective cases. However its role in emergency percutaneous tracheostomy has never been studied, since percutaneous tracheostomy itself remains an enigma in accessing emergency airway. There is no report of use of ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy in emergency setting so far in the literature. We report our early experience with USPCT in emergency setting.

Methods: Sixteen adult patients who required access to an emergency surgical airway after failure to accomplish emergency oro-tracheal intubation were the study population. Their airway was accessed by USPCT. Recorded data included clinical and demographic data including time taken to perform the procedure and complications. Short term and long term follow ups for a period of 2 years were done for the survivors.

Results: Twelve male and four female patients underwent the procedure and the average time of the procedure was 3.6 min with no failures nor conversions to surgical tracheostomy and no complications. The average oxygen saturation was 86% and average Glasgow coma scale was 8.4. This time period included the oxygen insufflation time. 10 patients were decannulated while six patients died due to the pathology of the disease itself. There were no complications in either short term or long term follow up.

Conclusion: USPCT has a definitive role in emergency both in trauma and non-trauma setting. It is safe, feasible and faster in experienced hands. Use of USPCT in emergency setting has further narrowed the list of contraindications of percutaneous tracheostomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时超声引导下急诊经皮气管切开术:玻璃天花板已被打破。
背景:近年来超声引导下经皮气管造口术(USPCT)已成为重症监护病房的常规做法。它的安全性和优越性优于传统经皮气管造口术和支气管镜引导下的PCT,在选择性病例中不逊色。然而,它在急诊经皮气管造口术中的作用从未被研究过,因为经皮气管造口术本身仍然是急诊气道的一个谜。目前尚无超声引导下经皮气管切开术用于急诊的文献报道。我们报告我们在紧急情况下使用USPCT的早期经验。方法:研究人群为16例成人患者,他们在完成紧急口气管插管失败后需要进入紧急手术气道。USPCT检查了他们的气道。记录的数据包括临床和人口统计数据,包括完成手术所需的时间和并发症。对幸存者进行了为期2年的短期和长期随访。结果:男12例,女4例,平均手术时间3.6 min,无手术失败,无转行气管切开术,无并发症。平均血氧饱和度86%,平均格拉斯哥昏迷评分8.4。这个时间段包括氧气充气时间。10名患者被切除血管,6名患者因疾病本身的病理而死亡。短期及长期随访均无并发症发生。结论:USPCT在创伤和非创伤情况下的急诊中都有明确的作用。在有经验的人手中,它是安全、可行和更快的。在紧急情况下使用USPCT进一步缩小了经皮气管切开术的禁忌症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Realtime ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy in emergency setting: the glass ceiling has been broken. The burning issue of white phosphorus: a case report and review of the literature. Allocating scarce medical resources during armed conflict: ethical issues Mental status assessment of disaster relief personnel by vocal affect display based on voice emotion recognition. The prevalence of medical symptoms in military aircrew.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1