Correcting Sociodemographic Selection Biases for Population Prediction from Social Media.

Salvatore Giorgi, Veronica E Lynn, Keshav Gupta, Farhan Ahmed, Sandra Matz, Lyle H Ungar, H Andrew Schwartz
{"title":"Correcting Sociodemographic Selection Biases for Population Prediction from Social Media.","authors":"Salvatore Giorgi, Veronica E Lynn, Keshav Gupta, Farhan Ahmed, Sandra Matz, Lyle H Ungar, H Andrew Schwartz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media is increasingly used for large-scale population predictions, such as estimating community health statistics. However, social media users are not typically a representative sample of the intended population - a \"selection bias\". Within the social sciences, such a bias is typically addressed with <i>restratification</i> techniques, where observations are reweighted according to how under- or over-sampled their socio-demographic groups are. Yet, restratifaction is rarely evaluated for improving prediction. In this two-part study, we first evaluate standard, \"out-of-the-box\" restratification techniques, finding they provide no improvement and often even degraded prediction accuracies across four tasks of esimating U.S. county population health statistics from Twitter. The core reasons for degraded performance seem to be tied to their reliance on either sparse or shrunken estimates of each population's socio-demographics. In the second part of our study, we develop and evaluate Robust Poststratification, which consists of three methods to address these problems: (1) <i>estimator redistribution</i> to account for shrinking, as well as (2) <i>adaptive binning</i> and (3) <i>informed smoothing</i> to handle sparse socio-demographic estimates. We show that each of these methods leads to significant improvement in prediction accuracies over the standard restratification approaches. Taken together, Robust Poststratification enables state-of-the-art prediction accuracies, yielding a 53.0% increase in variance explained (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>) in the case of surveyed life satisfaction, and a 17.8% average increase across all tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":74525,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media","volume":"16 1","pages":"228-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9714525/pdf/nihms-1842768.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media is increasingly used for large-scale population predictions, such as estimating community health statistics. However, social media users are not typically a representative sample of the intended population - a "selection bias". Within the social sciences, such a bias is typically addressed with restratification techniques, where observations are reweighted according to how under- or over-sampled their socio-demographic groups are. Yet, restratifaction is rarely evaluated for improving prediction. In this two-part study, we first evaluate standard, "out-of-the-box" restratification techniques, finding they provide no improvement and often even degraded prediction accuracies across four tasks of esimating U.S. county population health statistics from Twitter. The core reasons for degraded performance seem to be tied to their reliance on either sparse or shrunken estimates of each population's socio-demographics. In the second part of our study, we develop and evaluate Robust Poststratification, which consists of three methods to address these problems: (1) estimator redistribution to account for shrinking, as well as (2) adaptive binning and (3) informed smoothing to handle sparse socio-demographic estimates. We show that each of these methods leads to significant improvement in prediction accuracies over the standard restratification approaches. Taken together, Robust Poststratification enables state-of-the-art prediction accuracies, yielding a 53.0% increase in variance explained (R 2) in the case of surveyed life satisfaction, and a 17.8% average increase across all tasks.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从社交媒体中纠正人口预测的社会人口选择偏差。
社交媒体越来越多地被用于大规模人口预测,如估算社区健康统计数据。然而,社交媒体用户通常不是目标人群的代表性样本,这就是 "选择偏差"。在社会科学领域,这种偏差通常通过限制技术来解决,即根据社会人口群体样本不足或过多的程度对观察结果进行重新加权。然而,人们却很少对限制加权法是否能改善预测效果进行评估。在这项由两部分组成的研究中,我们首先评估了标准的、"开箱即用 "的restratifaction 技术,发现这些技术在从 Twitter 估算美国县级人口健康统计数据的四项任务中没有任何改进,甚至经常降低预测准确度。性能下降的核心原因似乎与它们对每个人口社会人口统计稀疏或缩减估计值的依赖有关。在研究的第二部分,我们开发并评估了稳健后分层法(Robust Poststratification),其中包括三种解决这些问题的方法:(1)估计器再分配以考虑缩减,以及(2)自适应分档和(3)知情平滑以处理稀疏的社会人口估计值。我们的研究表明,与标准限制方法相比,上述每种方法都能显著提高预测精度。综合来看,稳健后分层法实现了最先进的预测准确度,在调查生活满意度的情况下,解释方差(R 2)提高了 53.0%,在所有任务中平均提高了 17.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Negative Associations in Word Embeddings Predict Anti-black Bias across Regions-but Only via Name Frequency. Correcting Sociodemographic Selection Biases for Population Prediction from Social Media. Classifying Minority Stress Disclosure on Social Media with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory. Classifying Minority Stress Disclosure on Social Media with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Tweet Classification to Assist Human Moderation for Suicide Prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1