Myocardial Work Measurement With Functional Capacity Evaluation in Primary Systemic Hypertension Patients: Comparison Between Left Ventricle With and Without Hypertrophy.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Thoracic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-06 DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000690
Hong Ran, Xiao-Wu Ma, Lin-Lin Wan, Jun-Yi Ren, Jian-Xin Zhang, Ping-Yang Zhang, Matthias Schneider
{"title":"Myocardial Work Measurement With Functional Capacity Evaluation in Primary Systemic Hypertension Patients: Comparison Between Left Ventricle With and Without Hypertrophy.","authors":"Hong Ran, Xiao-Wu Ma, Lin-Lin Wan, Jun-Yi Ren, Jian-Xin Zhang, Ping-Yang Zhang, Matthias Schneider","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Noninvasive measurement of myocardial work (MW) incorporates left ventricular (LV) pressure, and, therefore, allows correction of global longitudinal strain for changing afterload conditions. We sought to investigate MW as a tool to detect early signs of LV dysfunction in primary systemic hypertension patients, particularly with different predictive indices.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>None left ventricular hypertrophy (NLVH) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) patients established were all primary systemic hypertension with preserved ejection fraction. Forty in NLVH and forty in LVH according to left ventricular end-diastolic mass index (LVEDmassI) were prospectively enrolled. The following indices of MW were assessed: global work index, global constructive work, global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE). Both global work index ( P =0.348) and global constructive work ( P =0.225) were increased in NLVH and decreased in LVH, and GWW ( P <0.001) was increased significantly in NLVH and increased more in LVH, while GWE ( P <0.001) was decreased significantly in NLVH and decreased more in LVH. The clinical utility of GWW (95% CI: 0.802-0.951) and GWE (95% CI: 0.811-0.950) were verified by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showing larger net benefits as evaluated with LVH and control comparisons. In multivariate linear regression analysis, 4-dimenaional LVEDmassI was independently associated with GWE ( P =0.018) in systemic hypertension patients. Assessment of intraobserver and interobserver variability in the MW echocardiographic data documented good interclass correlation coefficients (all >0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GWW and GWE derived from MW are more accurate, sensitive, and reproducible predictors to detect early LV dysfunction in primary systemic hypertension patients, especially in distinguishing the potential functional abnormality of NLVH and LVH, even though the ejection fraction is preserved.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11027989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Noninvasive measurement of myocardial work (MW) incorporates left ventricular (LV) pressure, and, therefore, allows correction of global longitudinal strain for changing afterload conditions. We sought to investigate MW as a tool to detect early signs of LV dysfunction in primary systemic hypertension patients, particularly with different predictive indices.

Methods and results: None left ventricular hypertrophy (NLVH) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) patients established were all primary systemic hypertension with preserved ejection fraction. Forty in NLVH and forty in LVH according to left ventricular end-diastolic mass index (LVEDmassI) were prospectively enrolled. The following indices of MW were assessed: global work index, global constructive work, global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE). Both global work index ( P =0.348) and global constructive work ( P =0.225) were increased in NLVH and decreased in LVH, and GWW ( P <0.001) was increased significantly in NLVH and increased more in LVH, while GWE ( P <0.001) was decreased significantly in NLVH and decreased more in LVH. The clinical utility of GWW (95% CI: 0.802-0.951) and GWE (95% CI: 0.811-0.950) were verified by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showing larger net benefits as evaluated with LVH and control comparisons. In multivariate linear regression analysis, 4-dimenaional LVEDmassI was independently associated with GWE ( P =0.018) in systemic hypertension patients. Assessment of intraobserver and interobserver variability in the MW echocardiographic data documented good interclass correlation coefficients (all >0.85).

Conclusion: GWW and GWE derived from MW are more accurate, sensitive, and reproducible predictors to detect early LV dysfunction in primary systemic hypertension patients, especially in distinguishing the potential functional abnormality of NLVH and LVH, even though the ejection fraction is preserved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性系统性高血压患者心肌功测量与功能能力评估:左心室有无肥厚的比较。
目的:无创心肌功(MW)测量包含左心室(LV)压力,因此可以根据后负荷的变化校正整体纵向应变。我们试图研究将心肌功作为检测原发性系统性高血压患者左心室功能障碍早期征兆的工具,特别是不同的预测指数:无左心室肥厚(NLVH)和左心室肥厚(LVH)患者均为射血分数保留的原发性全身性高血压。根据左心室舒张末期质量指数(LVEDmassI),40 名 NLVH 和 40 名 LVH 患者被纳入前瞻性研究。对以下工作效率指数进行了评估:全局工作指数、全局建设性工作、全局浪费工作(GWW)和全局工作效率(GWE)。全局工作指数(P=0.348)和全局建设性工作(P=0.225)在 NLVH 中均有所增加,而在 LVH 中则有所减少,全局浪费工作(GWW)(P0.85):结论:由MW得出的GWW和GWE是检测原发性系统性高血压患者早期左心室功能障碍的更准确、敏感和可重复的预测指标,尤其是在区分NLVH和LVH的潜在功能异常方面,即使射血分数保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Quantum Iterative Reconstruction for Ultra-high-resolution Photon-counting Computed Tomography of the Lung. Quantitative Chest Computed Tomography for Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease in Antisynthetase Patients. Evaluating Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Mono-exponential, Bi-exponential, and Stretched-exponential Models of Diffusion-weighted Imaging. Factors Associated With Delay in Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Surgery in a Lung Cancer Screening Program. Longitudinal Changes of CT-radiomic and Systemic Inflammatory Features Predict Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1