Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy and the Developing World.

International Scholarly Research Notices Pub Date : 2017-07-20 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2017/2636759
Tika Ram Bhandari, Sudha Shahi, Sarita Acharya
{"title":"Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy and the Developing World.","authors":"Tika Ram Bhandari,&nbsp;Sudha Shahi,&nbsp;Sarita Acharya","doi":"10.1155/2017/2636759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute appendicitis is the commonest nonobstetric surgical emergency during pregnancy. The aim of the study was to compare perioperative outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnant and nonpregnant patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of medical records of 56 pregnant patients between 2011 and 2016 who were compared with 164 nonpregnant women of reproductive age who underwent open appendectomy between 2014 and 2016 for acute appendicitis. The patient's demographics and perioperative data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of pregnant and nonpregnant patients observed was 26 years (range 19-37) and 26 years (range 18-43). There were no significant differences between the groups in negative appendectomy (21.4 and 21.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.52), perforated appendicitis (25 and 23.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.85), postoperative complications (28.6 and 26.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.80), and median length of hospital stay (5 and 4.5 days, <i>P</i> = 0.36). There were 3.6% preterm labour, no maternal mortality, and no fetal loss. In multivariate analysis, WBC >18000/mm<sup>3</sup> and long patient time to surgery were independent risk factors for appendicular perforation and postoperative complication (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results of appendectomy in pregnant patients are comparable with nonpregnant patients. Hence the same perioperative treatment protocol can be followed in pregnant and nonpregnant patients even in resource-poor setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14433,"journal":{"name":"International Scholarly Research Notices","volume":"2017 ","pages":"2636759"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/2636759","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Scholarly Research Notices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2636759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Acute appendicitis is the commonest nonobstetric surgical emergency during pregnancy. The aim of the study was to compare perioperative outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnant and nonpregnant patients.

Methods: A retrospective review of medical records of 56 pregnant patients between 2011 and 2016 who were compared with 164 nonpregnant women of reproductive age who underwent open appendectomy between 2014 and 2016 for acute appendicitis. The patient's demographics and perioperative data were analyzed.

Results: The median age of pregnant and nonpregnant patients observed was 26 years (range 19-37) and 26 years (range 18-43). There were no significant differences between the groups in negative appendectomy (21.4 and 21.3%, P = 0.52), perforated appendicitis (25 and 23.8%, P = 0.85), postoperative complications (28.6 and 26.8%, P = 0.80), and median length of hospital stay (5 and 4.5 days, P = 0.36). There were 3.6% preterm labour, no maternal mortality, and no fetal loss. In multivariate analysis, WBC >18000/mm3 and long patient time to surgery were independent risk factors for appendicular perforation and postoperative complication (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our results of appendectomy in pregnant patients are comparable with nonpregnant patients. Hence the same perioperative treatment protocol can be followed in pregnant and nonpregnant patients even in resource-poor setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期急性阑尾炎和发展中国家。
背景:急性阑尾炎是妊娠期最常见的非产科外科急诊。本研究的目的是比较急性阑尾炎孕妇和非孕妇围手术期的预后。方法:回顾性分析2011 - 2016年56例妊娠患者的医疗记录,并与2014 - 2016年因急性阑尾炎行开放式阑尾切除术的164例非妊娠育龄妇女进行比较。分析患者的人口统计学和围手术期资料。结果:观察到的孕妇和非孕妇的中位年龄分别为26岁(范围19-37)和26岁(范围18-43)。两组间阑尾切除阴性(21.4%和21.3%,P = 0.52)、阑尾穿孔(25%和23.8%,P = 0.85)、术后并发症(28.6%和26.8%,P = 0.80)、中位住院时间(5和4.5天,P = 0.36)差异无统计学意义。早产率为3.6%,无产妇死亡,无胎儿丢失。多因素分析中,WBC >18000/mm3、患者手术时间过长是阑尾穿孔及术后并发症的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。结论:妊娠患者阑尾切除术的效果与非妊娠患者相当。因此,即使在资源贫乏的环境中,孕妇和非孕妇也可以遵循相同的围手术期治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retracted: Properties of PbS: Ni2+ Nanocrystals in Thin Films by Chemical Bath Deposition Retracted: Necrotizing Fasciitis: Diagnostic Challenges and Current Practices Corrigendum to “Correlation between First and Second Trimester Uterine Artery Doppler Velocimetry and Placental Bed Histopathology” Retracted: Innovative Therapies against Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Retracted: Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1