Tuberculosis in children from diagnosis to decision to treat

S. Ramos , R. Gaio , F. Ferreira , J. Paulo Leal , S. Martins , J. Vasco Santos , I. Carvalho , R. Duarte
{"title":"Tuberculosis in children from diagnosis to decision to treat","authors":"S. Ramos ,&nbsp;R. Gaio ,&nbsp;F. Ferreira ,&nbsp;J. Paulo Leal ,&nbsp;S. Martins ,&nbsp;J. Vasco Santos ,&nbsp;I. Carvalho ,&nbsp;R. Duarte","doi":"10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Confirmation of tuberculosis (TB) in children is difficult, so clinicians use different procedures when deciding to treat.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Identify criteria to initiate and maintain TB treatment in children younger than 5 years-old, without diagnosis confirmation.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A web-based survey was distributed by email to the corresponding authors of journal articles on childhood TB. The observations were clustered into disjoint groups, and analyzed by Ward's method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We sent out 260 questionnaires and received 64 (24.6%) responses. Forty-six respondents (71.9%) said that microbiological confirmation was not important for initiation of anti-TB treatment, and that the epidemiological context and signs/symptoms suggestive of disease were most important. Sixty-one respondents (95.3%) said that the decision to continue therapy was mainly dependent on clinical improvement. A cluster of older respondents (median age: 52 years-old) who were active at a hospital or primary health care centre placed the most value on immunological test results and chest X-rays. A cluster of younger respondents (median age: 38 years-old) who were less experienced in management of TB placed more value on Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) results and chest computed tomography (CT) scans. A cluster of respondents with more experience in treating TB and working at specialized TB centres placed greater value on the clinical results and specific radiological alterations (“tree-in-bud” pattern and pleural effusion).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TB management varied according to the age, work location and experience of the clinicians. It is necessary to establish standardized guidelines used for the diagnosis and decision to treat TB in children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101122,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.06.004","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173511517300970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Setting

Confirmation of tuberculosis (TB) in children is difficult, so clinicians use different procedures when deciding to treat.

Objective

Identify criteria to initiate and maintain TB treatment in children younger than 5 years-old, without diagnosis confirmation.

Design

A web-based survey was distributed by email to the corresponding authors of journal articles on childhood TB. The observations were clustered into disjoint groups, and analyzed by Ward's method.

Results

We sent out 260 questionnaires and received 64 (24.6%) responses. Forty-six respondents (71.9%) said that microbiological confirmation was not important for initiation of anti-TB treatment, and that the epidemiological context and signs/symptoms suggestive of disease were most important. Sixty-one respondents (95.3%) said that the decision to continue therapy was mainly dependent on clinical improvement. A cluster of older respondents (median age: 52 years-old) who were active at a hospital or primary health care centre placed the most value on immunological test results and chest X-rays. A cluster of younger respondents (median age: 38 years-old) who were less experienced in management of TB placed more value on Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) results and chest computed tomography (CT) scans. A cluster of respondents with more experience in treating TB and working at specialized TB centres placed greater value on the clinical results and specific radiological alterations (“tree-in-bud” pattern and pleural effusion).

Conclusion

TB management varied according to the age, work location and experience of the clinicians. It is necessary to establish standardized guidelines used for the diagnosis and decision to treat TB in children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童结核病从诊断到决定治疗
儿童结核病的确诊是困难的,因此临床医生在决定治疗时使用不同的程序。目的确定在没有确诊的5岁以下儿童中开始和维持结核病治疗的标准。DesignA基于网络的调查通过电子邮件分发给儿童结核病期刊文章的通讯作者。观察结果被聚类成不相交的组,并用沃德的方法进行分析。结果共发放问卷260份,回收回复率为24.6%。46个答复者(71.9%)表示,微生物鉴定对于开始抗结核治疗并不重要,流行病学背景和提示疾病的体征/症状最为重要。61名受访者(95.3%)表示继续治疗的决定主要取决于临床改善。在医院或初级保健中心工作的一组年龄较大的应答者(年龄中位数:52岁)最看重免疫检查结果和胸部x光片。一组年轻的应答者(中位年龄:38岁)在结核病管理方面经验不足,他们更看重干扰素γ释放试验(IGRA)结果和胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)。一组在治疗结核病和在专门的结核病中心工作方面经验更丰富的应答者更重视临床结果和特定的放射改变(“树芽”型和胸膜积液)。结论临床医生的年龄、工作地点和经验不同,结核病的管理也不同。有必要制定用于诊断和决定治疗儿童结核病的标准化指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of physiotherapy in patients undergoing pulmonary surgery for lung cancer. A literature review The reliability of short-term measurement of heart rate variability during spontaneous breathing in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Pemetrexed-induced organizing pneumonia in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma Beneficial effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in adult asthma Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) – A case study of a rare entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1