Impulse oscillometry, spirometry, and passive smoking in healthy children and adolescents

C.I.S. Schivinski , M.S. de Assumpção , F.C.X.S. de Figueiredo , R.M.G. Wamosy , L.G. Ferreira , J.D. Ribeiro
{"title":"Impulse oscillometry, spirometry, and passive smoking in healthy children and adolescents","authors":"C.I.S. Schivinski ,&nbsp;M.S. de Assumpção ,&nbsp;F.C.X.S. de Figueiredo ,&nbsp;R.M.G. Wamosy ,&nbsp;L.G. Ferreira ,&nbsp;J.D. Ribeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify changes in the forced and quiet breathing parameters of lung function in healthy children and adolescents exposed to passive smoking (PS).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Comparative cross-sectional study. Healthy schoolchildren aged 6 to 14 years. We collected anthropometric data, lung function parameters using spirometry (forced breathing), and quiet breathing parameters using impulse oscillometry. The sample was divided into two groups according to exposure to PS: passive smoking group (PSG) and non-passive smoking group (NPSG). For the statistical analysis, the Shapiro–Wilk test was used to verify data normality and the <em>T</em>-test or Mann–Whitney test to compare spirometric and oscillometric parameters between groups (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>The study included 78 children and adolescents, with 14 boys and 25 girls in each group. There were differences in the mean values for peak expiratory flow (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups in values for <em>z</em>-score and lower limit of normal. The PSG had higher mean absolute values for reactance area (X5<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05) and significant percentage of predicted values for the following impulse oscillometry parameters: central airway resistance (R20%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03) and for the indicators of presence of airway obstruction (Fres%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01; X5%<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01% and AX%, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Children and adolescents exposed to PS had lower values for the spirometric variables and higher values for the oscillometric variables, indicating changes in forced and quiet parameters of lung function compared to the NPSG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101122,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.06.005","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173511517300982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective

To identify changes in the forced and quiet breathing parameters of lung function in healthy children and adolescents exposed to passive smoking (PS).

Method

Comparative cross-sectional study. Healthy schoolchildren aged 6 to 14 years. We collected anthropometric data, lung function parameters using spirometry (forced breathing), and quiet breathing parameters using impulse oscillometry. The sample was divided into two groups according to exposure to PS: passive smoking group (PSG) and non-passive smoking group (NPSG). For the statistical analysis, the Shapiro–Wilk test was used to verify data normality and the T-test or Mann–Whitney test to compare spirometric and oscillometric parameters between groups (p  0.05).

Main findings

The study included 78 children and adolescents, with 14 boys and 25 girls in each group. There were differences in the mean values for peak expiratory flow (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups in values for z-score and lower limit of normal. The PSG had higher mean absolute values for reactance area (X5 = 0.05) and significant percentage of predicted values for the following impulse oscillometry parameters: central airway resistance (R20%, p = 0.03) and for the indicators of presence of airway obstruction (Fres%, p = 0.01; X5% = 0.01% and AX%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

Children and adolescents exposed to PS had lower values for the spirometric variables and higher values for the oscillometric variables, indicating changes in forced and quiet parameters of lung function compared to the NPSG.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康儿童和青少年的脉冲振荡测量、肺活量测定和被动吸烟
目的探讨健康儿童和青少年被动吸烟(PS)后肺功能强迫呼吸和安静呼吸参数的变化。方法比较横断面研究。6至14岁的健康学童。我们收集了人体测量数据,使用肺活量测定法(强迫呼吸)收集了肺功能参数,使用脉冲振荡法收集了静息呼吸参数。根据接触PS的程度,将样本分为被动吸烟组(PSG)和非被动吸烟组(NPSG)。统计分析采用Shapiro-Wilk检验验证数据正态性,采用t检验或Mann-Whitney检验比较组间肺活量和振荡参数(p≤0.05)。该研究包括78名儿童和青少年,每组14名男孩和25名女孩。两组呼气流量峰值平均值差异有统计学意义(p = 0.01)。组间z-score值和正常下限无显著差异。PSG的电抗面积平均值绝对值较高(X5 = 0.05),以下脉冲振荡测量参数的预测值百分比显著:中央气道阻力(R20%, p = 0.03)和气道阻塞存在的指标(Fres%, p = 0.01;X5% = 0.01%, AX%, p = 0.01)。结论与NPSG相比,暴露于PS的儿童和青少年的肺活量测量值较低,而振荡测量值较高,表明肺功能的强迫和安静参数发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of physiotherapy in patients undergoing pulmonary surgery for lung cancer. A literature review The reliability of short-term measurement of heart rate variability during spontaneous breathing in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Pemetrexed-induced organizing pneumonia in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma Beneficial effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in adult asthma Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) – A case study of a rare entity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1