Androgen Deprivation Therapy and the Risk of Anemia in Men with Prostate Cancer.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Epidemiology Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000678
Blánaid M Hicks, Adi J Klil-Drori, Hui Yin, Lysanne Campeau, Laurent Azoulay
{"title":"Androgen Deprivation Therapy and the Risk of Anemia in Men with Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Blánaid M Hicks,&nbsp;Adi J Klil-Drori,&nbsp;Hui Yin,&nbsp;Lysanne Campeau,&nbsp;Laurent Azoulay","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000000678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer may be associated with an increased risk of anemia, but the evidence remains limited. This study aimed to determine if androgen deprivation is associated with increased risk of anemia in patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a population-based cohort study using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics repository. The cohort consisted of 10,364 men newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between 1 April 1998 and 30 September 2015. We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for anemia (hemoglobin <130 g/L) associated with current and past use of androgen deprivation therapy, compared with nonuse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3,651 incident anemia events during 31,574 person-years of follow-up (rate: 11.6/100 person-years). Current androgen deprivation therapy use was associated with a nearly three-fold increased hazard of anemia, compared with nonuse (23.5 vs. 5.9 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR: 2.90, 95% CI: 2.67, 3.16). The HR was elevated in the first 6 months of use (HR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.95, 2.48) and continued to be elevated with longer durations of use. Past androgen deprivation therapy use was associated with a lower estimate (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.43), which returned closer to the null ≥25 months after treatment discontinuation (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.15).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of androgen deprivation therapy is associated with increased risk of anemia, which reverses upon treatment discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":"28 5","pages":"712-718"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000678","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: The use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer may be associated with an increased risk of anemia, but the evidence remains limited. This study aimed to determine if androgen deprivation is associated with increased risk of anemia in patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Methods: This was a population-based cohort study using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics repository. The cohort consisted of 10,364 men newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between 1 April 1998 and 30 September 2015. We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for anemia (hemoglobin <130 g/L) associated with current and past use of androgen deprivation therapy, compared with nonuse.

Results: There were 3,651 incident anemia events during 31,574 person-years of follow-up (rate: 11.6/100 person-years). Current androgen deprivation therapy use was associated with a nearly three-fold increased hazard of anemia, compared with nonuse (23.5 vs. 5.9 per 100 person-years, respectively; HR: 2.90, 95% CI: 2.67, 3.16). The HR was elevated in the first 6 months of use (HR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.95, 2.48) and continued to be elevated with longer durations of use. Past androgen deprivation therapy use was associated with a lower estimate (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.43), which returned closer to the null ≥25 months after treatment discontinuation (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.15).

Conclusions: The use of androgen deprivation therapy is associated with increased risk of anemia, which reverses upon treatment discontinuation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雄激素剥夺治疗与前列腺癌患者贫血的风险。
背景:前列腺癌患者使用雄激素剥夺疗法可能与贫血风险增加有关,但证据仍然有限。本研究旨在确定雄激素剥夺是否与新诊断为前列腺癌的患者贫血风险增加有关。方法:这是一项基于人群的队列研究,使用英国临床实践研究数据链连接到医院事件统计库。该队列包括1998年4月1日至2015年9月30日期间新诊断为非转移性前列腺癌的10,364名男性。我们使用时间依赖的Cox比例风险模型来估计贫血(血红蛋白)的校正风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:在31,574人-年的随访期间,发生了3,651例贫血事件(比率:11.6/100人-年)。与未使用雄激素剥夺治疗相比,目前使用雄激素剥夺治疗与贫血风险增加近3倍相关(分别为23.5 vs 5.9 / 100人年;Hr: 2.90, 95% ci: 2.67, 3.16)。HR在使用前6个月升高(HR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.95, 2.48),并随着使用时间的延长而继续升高。过去雄激素剥夺治疗的使用与较低的估计相关(HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.43),在治疗停止≥25个月后返回更接近零值(HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.15)。结论:雄激素剥夺治疗与贫血风险增加相关,而停止治疗后贫血风险会逆转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic Status, Smoking, and Lung Cancer: Mediation and Bias Analysis in the SYNERGY Study. Low-level PM 2.5 Exposure, Cardiovascular and Nonaccidental Mortality, and Related Health Disparities in 12 US States. Influenza Activity and Preterm Birth in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area: A Time-Series Analysis from 2010 to 2017. Parameterization of Beta Distributions for Bias Parameters of Binary Exposure Misclassification in Probabilistic Bias Analysis. Back to Basics: What Descriptive Epidemiology Can Teach Us About the Recent Rise in Firearm Homicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1