A Review of Conventional PCR Assays for the Detection of Selected Phytopathogens of Wheat.

IF 1.2 Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-08-04 DOI:10.1159/000477544
Adam Kuzdraliński, Anna Kot, Hubert Szczerba, Michał Nowak, Marta Muszyńska
{"title":"A Review of Conventional PCR Assays for the Detection of Selected Phytopathogens of Wheat.","authors":"Adam Kuzdraliński,&nbsp;Anna Kot,&nbsp;Hubert Szczerba,&nbsp;Michał Nowak,&nbsp;Marta Muszyńska","doi":"10.1159/000477544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infection of phyllosphere (stems, leaves, husks, and grains) by pathogenic fungi reduces the wheat yield and grain quality. Detection of the main wheat pathogenic fungi provides information about species composition and allows effective and targeted plant treatment. Since conventional procedures for the detection of these organisms are unreliable and time consuming, diagnostic DNA-based methods are required. Nucleic acid amplification technologies are independent of the morphological and biochemical characteristics of fungi. Microorganisms do not need to be cultured. Therefore, a number of PCR-based methodologies have been developed for the identification of key pathogenic fungi, such as Fusarium spp., Puccinia spp., Zymoseptoria tritici, Parastagonospora nodorum, Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. This article reviews frequently used DNA regions for fungus identification and discusses already known PCR assays for detection of the aforementioned wheat pathogens. We demonstrate that PCR-based wheat pathogen identification assays require further research. In particular, the number of diagnostic tests for Fusarium graminearum, Puccinia spp., and P. tritici-repentis are insufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":16370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology","volume":"27 3","pages":"175-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000477544","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000477544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Infection of phyllosphere (stems, leaves, husks, and grains) by pathogenic fungi reduces the wheat yield and grain quality. Detection of the main wheat pathogenic fungi provides information about species composition and allows effective and targeted plant treatment. Since conventional procedures for the detection of these organisms are unreliable and time consuming, diagnostic DNA-based methods are required. Nucleic acid amplification technologies are independent of the morphological and biochemical characteristics of fungi. Microorganisms do not need to be cultured. Therefore, a number of PCR-based methodologies have been developed for the identification of key pathogenic fungi, such as Fusarium spp., Puccinia spp., Zymoseptoria tritici, Parastagonospora nodorum, Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici, and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. This article reviews frequently used DNA regions for fungus identification and discusses already known PCR assays for detection of the aforementioned wheat pathogens. We demonstrate that PCR-based wheat pathogen identification assays require further research. In particular, the number of diagnostic tests for Fusarium graminearum, Puccinia spp., and P. tritici-repentis are insufficient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小麦部分病原菌的传统PCR检测方法综述。
病原真菌侵染根茎圈(茎、叶、皮和籽粒)会降低小麦产量和籽粒品质。主要小麦病原真菌的检测提供了种类组成的信息,并允许有效和有针对性的植物处理。由于检测这些生物的常规方法不可靠且耗时,因此需要基于dna的诊断方法。核酸扩增技术独立于真菌的形态和生化特性。微生物不需要培养。因此,许多基于pcr的方法已被开发用于鉴定关键致病真菌,如镰刀菌、契契菌、小麦酵母菌、诺氏芽孢副菌、小麦蓝孢菌和小麦白腐菌。本文综述了用于真菌鉴定的常用DNA区域,并讨论了用于检测上述小麦病原体的已知PCR检测方法。我们认为基于pcr的小麦病原菌鉴定方法有待进一步研究。特别是,对谷物镰刀菌、契契菌和小麦镰刀菌的诊断试验数量不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology
Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: We are entering a new and exciting era of microbiological study and application. Recent advances in the now established disciplines of genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics, together with extensive cooperation between academic and industrial concerns have brought about an integration of basic and applied microbiology as never before.
期刊最新文献
Contents Front & Back Matter The Life Cycle of Dictyostelium discoideum Is Accelerated via MAP Kinase Cascade by a Culture Extract Produced by a Synthetic Microbial Consortium A Riboflavin Transporter in Bdellovibrio exovorous JSS Front & Back Matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1