The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research.

IF 17.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Psychological bulletin Pub Date : 2017-12-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-26 DOI:10.1037/bul0000123
Carol Chu, Jennifer M Buchman-Schmitt, Ian H Stanley, Melanie A Hom, Raymond P Tucker, Christopher R Hagan, Megan L Rogers, Matthew C Podlogar, Bruno Chiurliza, Fallon B Ringer, Matthew S Michaels, Connor H G Patros, Thomas E Joiner
{"title":"The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research.","authors":"Carol Chu, Jennifer M Buchman-Schmitt, Ian H Stanley, Melanie A Hom, Raymond P Tucker, Christopher R Hagan, Megan L Rogers, Matthew C Podlogar, Bruno Chiurliza, Fallon B Ringer, Matthew S Michaels, Connor H G Patros, Thomas E Joiner","doi":"10.1037/bul0000123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past decade, the interpersonal theory of suicide has contributed to substantial advances in the scientific and clinical understanding of suicide and related conditions. The interpersonal theory of suicide posits that suicidal desire emerges when individuals experience intractable feelings of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness and near-lethal or lethal suicidal behavior occurs in the presence of suicidal desire and capability for suicide. A growing number of studies have tested these posited pathways in various samples; however, these findings have yet to be evaluated meta-analytically. This paper aimed to (a) conduct a systematic review of the unpublished and published, peer-reviewed literature examining the relationship between interpersonal theory constructs and suicidal thoughts and behaviors, (b) conduct meta-analyses testing the interpersonal theory hypotheses, and (c) evaluate the influence of various moderators on these relationships. Four electronic bibliographic databases were searched through the end of March, 2016: PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Hypothesis-driven meta-analyses using random effects models were conducted using 122 distinct unpublished and published samples. Findings supported the interpersonal theory: the interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness was significantly associated with suicidal ideation; and the interaction between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide was significantly related to a greater number of prior suicide attempts. However, effect sizes for these interactions were modest. Alternative configurations of theory variables were similarly useful for predicting suicide risk as theory-consistent pathways. We conclude with limitations and recommendations for the interpersonal theory as a framework for understanding the suicidal spectrum. (PsycINFO Database Record</p>","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"143 12","pages":"1313-1345"},"PeriodicalIF":17.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730496/pdf/nihms899466.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, the interpersonal theory of suicide has contributed to substantial advances in the scientific and clinical understanding of suicide and related conditions. The interpersonal theory of suicide posits that suicidal desire emerges when individuals experience intractable feelings of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness and near-lethal or lethal suicidal behavior occurs in the presence of suicidal desire and capability for suicide. A growing number of studies have tested these posited pathways in various samples; however, these findings have yet to be evaluated meta-analytically. This paper aimed to (a) conduct a systematic review of the unpublished and published, peer-reviewed literature examining the relationship between interpersonal theory constructs and suicidal thoughts and behaviors, (b) conduct meta-analyses testing the interpersonal theory hypotheses, and (c) evaluate the influence of various moderators on these relationships. Four electronic bibliographic databases were searched through the end of March, 2016: PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Hypothesis-driven meta-analyses using random effects models were conducted using 122 distinct unpublished and published samples. Findings supported the interpersonal theory: the interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness was significantly associated with suicidal ideation; and the interaction between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide was significantly related to a greater number of prior suicide attempts. However, effect sizes for these interactions were modest. Alternative configurations of theory variables were similarly useful for predicting suicide risk as theory-consistent pathways. We conclude with limitations and recommendations for the interpersonal theory as a framework for understanding the suicidal spectrum. (PsycINFO Database Record

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自杀的人际关系理论:十年跨国研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
在过去的十年里,自杀的人际理论为科学和临床对自杀及其相关条件的理解做出了重大贡献。自杀的人际关系理论认为,当个体经历难以解决的负担感和归属感受挫时,就会产生自杀欲望,在存在自杀欲望和自杀能力的情况下,会发生近乎致命或致命的自杀行为。越来越多的研究在各种样本中测试了这些假定的途径;然而,这些发现尚待元分析评估。本文旨在(a)对未发表和已发表的同行评审文献进行系统综述,研究人际理论结构与自杀想法和行为之间的关系,(b)对人际理论假设进行荟萃分析,以及(c)评估各种调节因素对这些关系的影响。截至2016年3月底,检索了四个电子书目数据库:PubMed、Medline、PsycINFO和Web of Science。使用随机效应模型进行假设驱动的荟萃分析,使用122个不同的未发表和已发表样本。研究结果支持了人际关系理论:受挫的归属感和感知的负担感之间的互动与自杀意念显著相关;归属感受挫、感知负担和自杀能力之间的相互作用与大量先前的自杀企图显著相关。然而,这些相互作用的影响大小是适度的。作为理论一致的途径,理论变量的替代配置同样有助于预测自杀风险。最后,我们提出了人际关系理论作为理解自杀谱的框架的局限性和建议。(PsycINFO数据库记录
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological bulletin
Psychological bulletin 医学-心理学
CiteScore
33.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychological Bulletin publishes syntheses of research in scientific psychology. Research syntheses seek to summarize past research by drawing overall conclusions from many separate investigations that address related or identical hypotheses. A research synthesis typically presents the authors' assessments: -of the state of knowledge concerning the relations of interest; -of critical assessments of the strengths and weaknesses in past research; -of important issues that research has left unresolved, thereby directing future research so it can yield a maximum amount of new information.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive factors underlying mathematical skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Defining social reward: A systematic review of human and animal studies. Cultural diversity climate in school: A meta-analytic review of its relationships with intergroup, academic, and socioemotional outcomes. The development of children's gender stereotypes about STEM and verbal abilities: A preregistered meta-analytic review of 98 studies. Reporting bias, not external focus: A robust Bayesian meta-analysis and systematic review of the external focus of attention literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1