The Unyvero P55 ‘sample-in, answer-out’ pneumonia assay: A performance evaluation

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Pub Date : 2017-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bdq.2017.06.001
C. Ozongwu , Y. Personne , G. Platt , C. Jeanes , S. Aydin , N. Kozato , V. Gant , J. O’Grady , V.I. Enne
{"title":"The Unyvero P55 ‘sample-in, answer-out’ pneumonia assay: A performance evaluation","authors":"C. Ozongwu ,&nbsp;Y. Personne ,&nbsp;G. Platt ,&nbsp;C. Jeanes ,&nbsp;S. Aydin ,&nbsp;N. Kozato ,&nbsp;V. Gant ,&nbsp;J. O’Grady ,&nbsp;V.I. Enne","doi":"10.1016/j.bdq.2017.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>O’Neill’s recent Review on Antimicrobial Resistance expressed the view that by 2020 high-income countries should make it mandatory to support antimicrobial prescribing with rapid diagnostic evidence whenever possible.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Routine microbiology diagnosis of 95 respiratory specimens from patients with severe infection were compared with those generated by the Unyvero P55 test, which detects 20 pathogens and 19 antimicrobial resistance markers. Supplementary molecular testing for antimicrobial resistance genes, comprehensive culture methodology and 16S rRNA sequencing were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Unyvero P55 produced 85 valid results, 67% of which were concordant with those from the routine laboratory. Unyvero P55 identified more potential pathogens per specimen than routine culture (1.34 vs. 0.47 per specimen). Independent verification using 16S rRNA sequencing and culture (n = 10) corroborated 58% of additional detections compared to routine microbiology. Overall the average sensitivity for organism detection by Unyvero P55 was 88.8% and specificity was 94.9%. While Unyvero P55 detected more antimicrobial resistance markers than routine culture, some instances of phenotypic resistance were missed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Unyvero P55 is a rapid pathogen detection test for lower respiratory specimens, which identifies a larger number of pathogens than routine microbiology. The clinical significance of these additional organisms is yet to be determined. Further studies are required to determine the effect of the test in practise on antimicrobial prescribing and patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38073,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bdq.2017.06.001","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Detection and Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214753517300062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Background

O’Neill’s recent Review on Antimicrobial Resistance expressed the view that by 2020 high-income countries should make it mandatory to support antimicrobial prescribing with rapid diagnostic evidence whenever possible.

Methods

Routine microbiology diagnosis of 95 respiratory specimens from patients with severe infection were compared with those generated by the Unyvero P55 test, which detects 20 pathogens and 19 antimicrobial resistance markers. Supplementary molecular testing for antimicrobial resistance genes, comprehensive culture methodology and 16S rRNA sequencing were performed.

Results

Unyvero P55 produced 85 valid results, 67% of which were concordant with those from the routine laboratory. Unyvero P55 identified more potential pathogens per specimen than routine culture (1.34 vs. 0.47 per specimen). Independent verification using 16S rRNA sequencing and culture (n = 10) corroborated 58% of additional detections compared to routine microbiology. Overall the average sensitivity for organism detection by Unyvero P55 was 88.8% and specificity was 94.9%. While Unyvero P55 detected more antimicrobial resistance markers than routine culture, some instances of phenotypic resistance were missed.

Conclusions

The Unyvero P55 is a rapid pathogen detection test for lower respiratory specimens, which identifies a larger number of pathogens than routine microbiology. The clinical significance of these additional organisms is yet to be determined. Further studies are required to determine the effect of the test in practise on antimicrobial prescribing and patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unyvero P55“进样、出样”肺炎检测:性能评价
背景neill最近发表的《抗微生物药物耐药性评论》认为,到2020年,高收入国家应尽可能强制支持使用快速诊断证据开具抗微生物药物处方。方法对95例重症感染患者呼吸道标本的常规微生物学诊断结果与Unyvero P55检测结果进行比较,Unyvero P55检测出20种病原菌和19种耐药标志物。补充耐药基因分子检测、综合培养方法学和16S rRNA测序。结果yvero P55共产生85个有效结果,其中67%与常规实验室结果一致。Unyvero P55比常规培养在每个标本中鉴定出更多的潜在病原体(1.34比0.47)。使用16S rRNA测序和培养(n = 10)的独立验证证实,与常规微生物学相比,增加了58%的检测。总体而言,Unyvero P55对微生物检测的平均灵敏度为88.8%,特异性为94.9%。与常规培养相比,Unyvero P55检测到更多的抗菌药物耐药标记,但遗漏了一些表型耐药实例。结论Unyvero P55是一种用于下呼吸道标本的快速病原体检测方法,其检出的病原体数量高于常规微生物学。这些附加生物体的临床意义尚待确定。需要进一步研究以确定实践中测试对抗菌药物处方和患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification
Biomolecular Detection and Quantification Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Establishing essential quality criteria for the validation of circular RNAs as biomarkers qPCR data analysis: Better results through iconoclasm Considerations and quality controls when analyzing cell-free tumor DNA Next-generation sequencing of HIV-1 single genome amplicons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1