Turking Overtime: How Participant Characteristics and Behavior Vary Over Time and Day on Amazon Mechanical Turk.

IF 1.9 Journal of the Economic Science Association Pub Date : 2017-07-01 Epub Date: 2017-05-16 DOI:10.1007/s40881-017-0035-0
Antonio A Arechar, Gordon Kraft-Todd, David G Rand
{"title":"Turking Overtime: How Participant Characteristics and Behavior Vary Over Time and Day on Amazon Mechanical Turk.","authors":"Antonio A Arechar, Gordon Kraft-Todd, David G Rand","doi":"10.1007/s40881-017-0035-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online experiments allow researchers to collect datasets at times not typical of laboratory studies. We recruit 2,336 participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk to examine if participant characteristics and behaviors differ depending on whether the experiment is conducted during the day versus night, and on weekdays versus weekends. Participants make incentivized decisions involving prosociality, punishment, and discounting, and complete a demographic and personality survey. We find no time or day differences in behavior, but do find that participants at nights and on weekends are less experienced with online studies; on weekends are less reflective; and at night are less conscientious and more neurotic. These results are largely robust to finer grained measures of time and day. We also find that those who participated earlier in the course of the study are more experienced, reflective, and agreeable, but less charitable than later participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":91563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5675003/pdf/nihms877212.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Economic Science Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-017-0035-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online experiments allow researchers to collect datasets at times not typical of laboratory studies. We recruit 2,336 participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk to examine if participant characteristics and behaviors differ depending on whether the experiment is conducted during the day versus night, and on weekdays versus weekends. Participants make incentivized decisions involving prosociality, punishment, and discounting, and complete a demographic and personality survey. We find no time or day differences in behavior, but do find that participants at nights and on weekends are less experienced with online studies; on weekends are less reflective; and at night are less conscientious and more neurotic. These results are largely robust to finer grained measures of time and day. We also find that those who participated earlier in the course of the study are more experienced, reflective, and agreeable, but less charitable than later participants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Turking Overtime:亚马逊 Mechanical Turk 上的参与者特征和行为如何随时间和日期而变化。
在线实验允许研究人员在实验室研究以外的时间收集数据集。我们从 Amazon Mechanical Turk 招募了 2,336 名参与者,研究参与者的特征和行为是否会因实验在白天还是晚上、工作日还是周末进行而有所不同。参与者会做出涉及亲社会性、惩罚和贴现的激励决策,并完成一项人口统计学和人格调查。我们没有发现时间或日期上的行为差异,但发现晚上和周末的参与者在线学习经验较少;周末的参与者反思能力较弱;晚上的参与者自觉性较差,神经质程度较高。这些结果在更细化的时间和日期测量中基本是稳健的。我们还发现,较早参与研究的人比较晚参与研究的人更有经验、更善于反思、更合群,但却不那么乐善好施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The seeds of success: the pivotal role of first round cooperation in public goods games Indefinitely repeated contests with incumbency advantage Conditional cooperation and group size: experimental evidence from a public good game Overconfidence: the roles of gender, public observability and incentives Who’s who: how uncertainty about the favored group affects outcomes of affirmative action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1