Power to the People: Data Citizens in the Age of Precision Medicine.

Barbara J Evans
{"title":"Power to the People: Data Citizens in the Age of Precision Medicine.","authors":"Barbara J Evans","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twentieth-century bioethics celebrated individual autonomy but framed autonomy largely in terms of an individual's power to make decisions and act alone. The most pressing challenges of big data science in the twenty-first century can only be resolved through collective action and common purpose. This Article surveys some of these challenges and asks how common purpose can ever emerge on the present bioethical and regulatory landscape. The solution may lie in embracing a broader concept of autonomy that empowers individuals to protect their interests by exercising meaningful rights of data citizenship. This Article argues that twentieth-century bioethics was a paternalistic, top-down affair in which self-proclaimed ethics experts set standards to protect research subjects portrayed as autonomous yet too vulnerable and disorganized to protect themselves. The time may be ripe for BioEXIT, a popular uprising of regular people seeking a meaningful voice in establishing citizen-led ethical and privacy standards to advance big-data science while addressing the concerns people feel about the privacy of their health data.</p>","PeriodicalId":92157,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt journal of entertainment and technology law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5673282/pdf/nihms883855.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt journal of entertainment and technology law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twentieth-century bioethics celebrated individual autonomy but framed autonomy largely in terms of an individual's power to make decisions and act alone. The most pressing challenges of big data science in the twenty-first century can only be resolved through collective action and common purpose. This Article surveys some of these challenges and asks how common purpose can ever emerge on the present bioethical and regulatory landscape. The solution may lie in embracing a broader concept of autonomy that empowers individuals to protect their interests by exercising meaningful rights of data citizenship. This Article argues that twentieth-century bioethics was a paternalistic, top-down affair in which self-proclaimed ethics experts set standards to protect research subjects portrayed as autonomous yet too vulnerable and disorganized to protect themselves. The time may be ripe for BioEXIT, a popular uprising of regular people seeking a meaningful voice in establishing citizen-led ethical and privacy standards to advance big-data science while addressing the concerns people feel about the privacy of their health data.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人民的权力:精准医疗时代的数据公民。
20世纪的生物伦理学推崇个人的自主性,但将自主性主要定义为个人做出决定和单独行动的权力。21世纪大数据科学最紧迫的挑战只能通过集体行动和共同目标来解决。本文调查了其中的一些挑战,并询问如何在当前的生物伦理和监管环境中出现共同的目标。解决方案可能在于接受更广泛的自治概念,使个人能够通过行使有意义的数据公民权利来保护自己的利益。这篇文章认为,20世纪的生物伦理学是一种家长式的、自上而下的事务,在这种事务中,自称为伦理学专家的人制定了保护研究对象的标准,这些研究对象被描述为自主的,但却过于脆弱和混乱,无法保护自己。BioEXIT的时机可能已经成熟,这是一场普通民众的起义,他们寻求在建立公民主导的道德和隐私标准方面发出有意义的声音,以推进大数据科学,同时解决人们对其健康数据隐私的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power to the People: Data Citizens in the Age of Precision Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1