[Facet Fixation Combined with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Experience and A New Method of Surgical Treatment of Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Diseases].

V A Byvaltsev, A A Kalinin, A K Okoneshnikova, T T Kerimbaev, E G Belykh
{"title":"[Facet Fixation Combined with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparative Analysis of Clinical Experience and A New Method of Surgical Treatment of Patients with Lumbar Degenerative Diseases].","authors":"V A Byvaltsev,&nbsp;A A Kalinin,&nbsp;A K Okoneshnikova,&nbsp;T T Kerimbaev,&nbsp;E G Belykh","doi":"10.15690/vramn738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine the technique of pedicle fixation is widespread, when after open decompression channel structure locking screws are introduced into the vertebral body through the back vertebra legs. We first used a fundamentally new way of fixing the rear using the facet-boards Cage «Facet Wedge», when posterior fixation is done by closing the facet joints with minimally invasive, percutaneous method. We have not found data on the clinical efficacy of facet fixation in scientific literature.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 145 patients who were divided into 2 groups. The study group with long-term observation included patients (n=100) who underwent a new method for lumbar fixation; the method comprises unilateral or bilateral implantation of titanium Cage «facet Wedge» in the joint space facet joint in combination with the anterior, lateral, and transforaminal interbody fusion. Clinical comparison group (n=45) included retrospectively recruited patients who were performed titanium pedicle screw installation after open decompression and interbody fusion posterior lumbar fixation. Dynamic observation and comprehensive evaluation of the treatment clinical results was carried out for 18 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cage facet installation technology is quite simple, universal for the stabilization of the rear of the complex after interbody fusion from the front, side, and rear access; and does not require the intraoperative application of expensive high-tech equipment. Comparative analysis of the main group showed significantly better results in terms of the duration of the operation [CG 125 (90; 140) min, the CCG 205 (160; 220) min; p=0.01], the volume of blood loss [CG 80 (70; 120) ml, CCG 350 (300; 550) ml; p=0.008], activation time [CG 2 (1; 2) days, 4 CCG (3; 5) days; p=0.02], length of hospitalization [CG 9 (10; 11) days, the CCG 13 (12; 15) days; p=0.03], the level of pain on a visual analog scale [CG 3 (2; 4) mm, CCG 15 (12; 18) mm; p=0.001], quality of life (by index Oswestry) [CG 8 (6; 8) points, the CCG 23 (20; 28) points, p=0.003], and labor rehabilitation [CG 3 (2; 6) months, CCG 9 (6; 12) months; p=0.0001]. The number of postoperative complications in group 1 was 13%, in the 2nd ― 31,1% (p=0,0012). The new method involves fixing the back with considerably less surgical trauma of paravertebral soft tissue that results in early activation of patients, reduction of stay in hospital period, and better functional recovery of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine allows achieving the best clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications during the short and long-term follow-up if compared with the traditional method of transpedicular stabilization. The combination of low-impact and reliability facet fixation techniques for posterior stabilization of the operated segment creates favorable conditions for the restoration of a functional condition of patients, full social and physical rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39355,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk","volume":"71 5","pages":"375-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background: For the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine the technique of pedicle fixation is widespread, when after open decompression channel structure locking screws are introduced into the vertebral body through the back vertebra legs. We first used a fundamentally new way of fixing the rear using the facet-boards Cage «Facet Wedge», when posterior fixation is done by closing the facet joints with minimally invasive, percutaneous method. We have not found data on the clinical efficacy of facet fixation in scientific literature.

Aims: To compare the clinical efficacy of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.

Materials and methods: The study included 145 patients who were divided into 2 groups. The study group with long-term observation included patients (n=100) who underwent a new method for lumbar fixation; the method comprises unilateral or bilateral implantation of titanium Cage «facet Wedge» in the joint space facet joint in combination with the anterior, lateral, and transforaminal interbody fusion. Clinical comparison group (n=45) included retrospectively recruited patients who were performed titanium pedicle screw installation after open decompression and interbody fusion posterior lumbar fixation. Dynamic observation and comprehensive evaluation of the treatment clinical results was carried out for 18 months after surgery.

Results: Cage facet installation technology is quite simple, universal for the stabilization of the rear of the complex after interbody fusion from the front, side, and rear access; and does not require the intraoperative application of expensive high-tech equipment. Comparative analysis of the main group showed significantly better results in terms of the duration of the operation [CG 125 (90; 140) min, the CCG 205 (160; 220) min; p=0.01], the volume of blood loss [CG 80 (70; 120) ml, CCG 350 (300; 550) ml; p=0.008], activation time [CG 2 (1; 2) days, 4 CCG (3; 5) days; p=0.02], length of hospitalization [CG 9 (10; 11) days, the CCG 13 (12; 15) days; p=0.03], the level of pain on a visual analog scale [CG 3 (2; 4) mm, CCG 15 (12; 18) mm; p=0.001], quality of life (by index Oswestry) [CG 8 (6; 8) points, the CCG 23 (20; 28) points, p=0.003], and labor rehabilitation [CG 3 (2; 6) months, CCG 9 (6; 12) months; p=0.0001]. The number of postoperative complications in group 1 was 13%, in the 2nd ― 31,1% (p=0,0012). The new method involves fixing the back with considerably less surgical trauma of paravertebral soft tissue that results in early activation of patients, reduction of stay in hospital period, and better functional recovery of patients.

Conclusions: The application of facet fixation combined with interbody fusion in the treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine allows achieving the best clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications during the short and long-term follow-up if compared with the traditional method of transpedicular stabilization. The combination of low-impact and reliability facet fixation techniques for posterior stabilization of the operated segment creates favorable conditions for the restoration of a functional condition of patients, full social and physical rehabilitation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[关节突固定联合腰椎椎间融合术:临床经验与手术治疗腰椎退行性疾病新方法的比较分析]。
背景:在腰椎退行性疾病患者的治疗中,椎弓根固定技术被广泛应用,在开放减压通道结构后,通过椎腿将锁定螺钉引入椎体。我们首先使用了一种全新的固定后关节的方法,即使用Facet -boards Cage«Facet Wedge»,通过微创经皮方法关闭小面关节进行后路固定。我们没有在科学文献中找到关于关节突固定的临床疗效的数据。目的:比较关节突内固定联合椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的临床疗效。材料与方法:145例患者分为两组。长期观察的研究组包括采用新腰椎固定方法的患者(n=100);该方法包括在关节间隙内单侧或双侧植入钛Cage«facet Wedge»关节突关节,并结合前路、外侧和经椎间孔椎间融合。临床对照组(n=45)回顾性招募开放性减压椎间融合腰椎后路固定后行钛椎弓根螺钉固定的患者。术后18个月对治疗临床效果进行动态观察和综合评价。结果:椎体间融合术后的椎体后部均可从前、侧、后入路固定Cage小关节面,其安装技术简单、通用;而且不需要术中使用昂贵的高科技设备。对比分析显示,主组在手术持续时间方面明显优于对照组[CG 125 (90;140) min, CCG 205 (160;220)最小;p=0.01],失血量[cg80 (70;120) ml, CCG 350 (300;550毫升;p=0.008],激活时间[CG 2 (1;2)天,4 CCG (3;5)天;p=0.02],住院时间[CG 9 (10;11) d, CCG 13 (12) d;15)天;p=0.03],视觉模拟量表疼痛程度[CG 3 (2;4) mm, CCG 15 (12;18)毫米;p=0.001],生活质量(按Oswestry指数计算)[CG 8 (6;8)分,CCG 23 (20;28)分,p=0.003],劳动康复[cg3 (2;6)月,CCG 9 (6;12)个月;p = 0.0001)。术后并发症发生率1组为13%,2组为31.1% (p= 0.0012)。新方法对椎旁软组织的手术损伤较小,可使患者早期活动,缩短住院时间,更好地恢复功能。结论:与传统的经椎弓根固定方法相比,应用小关节面固定联合椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病患者可获得最佳临床效果,且在短期和长期随访中术后并发症较少。结合低冲击和可靠的关节面固定技术对手术节段进行后路稳定,为患者的功能恢复、充分的社会和身体康复创造了有利的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
[Paraoxonase: The Universal Factor of Antioxidant Defense in Human Body]. [The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in the Pathogenesis of Adipocyte Dysfunction in Metabolic Syndrome. Prospects of Pharmacological Correction]. [Urethra Reconstruction with Tissue-Engineering Technology]. [Efficacy of Management for Rational Use of Antibiotics in Surgical Departments at a Multi-Disciplinary Hospital: Results of a 7-year Pharmacoepidemiological Research]. [Peculiarities of Allergy Diagnosis in Children].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1