Associations between substance use and type of crime in prisoners with substance use problems - a focus on violence and fatal violence.

IF 5.1 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2018-01-15 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/SAR.S143251
Anders Håkansson, Virginia Jesionowska
{"title":"Associations between substance use and type of crime in prisoners with substance use problems - a focus on violence and fatal violence.","authors":"Anders Håkansson,&nbsp;Virginia Jesionowska","doi":"10.2147/SAR.S143251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study aimed to study the associations between substance use patterns and types of crimes in prisoners with substance use problems, and specifically whether substance use patterns were different in violent offenders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interview data of prisoners with substance use problems (N=4,202, mean age 33.5 years, SD 9.8), derived from the Addiction Severity Index, were run against criminal register data on main types of crimes in the verdict.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In binary analyses, compared to those with acquisitive and drug crimes, violent offenders had lower prevalence of illicit drugs and homelessness, but higher prevalence of binge drinking, and higher prevalence of sedative use than clients sentenced with drug crimes. Clients with violent crime had lower prevalence of injecting drug use, compared to all other crimes. In logistic regression, binge drinking and sedatives were positively associated with violent crime (as opposed to non-violent crime), whereas heroin, amphetamine, cocaine, and injecting drug use were negatively associated with violent crime. Among violent offenders only, sedatives tended to be associated with fatal violence (<i>p</i>=0.06), whereas amphetamine, homelessness, age, and (marginally significant, <i>p</i>=0.05) heroin were negatively associated with fatal violence, as opposed to non-fatal violence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment and risk assessment in violent perpetrators with substance use may need to address sedatives and alcohol specifically. Limitations of the study are due to self-reported and cross-sectional data and because a large majority of the prison sample studied here are men.</p>","PeriodicalId":22060,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","volume":"9 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/SAR.S143251","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S143251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed to study the associations between substance use patterns and types of crimes in prisoners with substance use problems, and specifically whether substance use patterns were different in violent offenders.

Methods: Interview data of prisoners with substance use problems (N=4,202, mean age 33.5 years, SD 9.8), derived from the Addiction Severity Index, were run against criminal register data on main types of crimes in the verdict.

Results: In binary analyses, compared to those with acquisitive and drug crimes, violent offenders had lower prevalence of illicit drugs and homelessness, but higher prevalence of binge drinking, and higher prevalence of sedative use than clients sentenced with drug crimes. Clients with violent crime had lower prevalence of injecting drug use, compared to all other crimes. In logistic regression, binge drinking and sedatives were positively associated with violent crime (as opposed to non-violent crime), whereas heroin, amphetamine, cocaine, and injecting drug use were negatively associated with violent crime. Among violent offenders only, sedatives tended to be associated with fatal violence (p=0.06), whereas amphetamine, homelessness, age, and (marginally significant, p=0.05) heroin were negatively associated with fatal violence, as opposed to non-fatal violence.

Conclusion: Treatment and risk assessment in violent perpetrators with substance use may need to address sedatives and alcohol specifically. Limitations of the study are due to self-reported and cross-sectional data and because a large majority of the prison sample studied here are men.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有药物使用问题的囚犯的药物使用与犯罪类型之间的联系——重点是暴力和致命暴力。
目的:本研究旨在研究有物质使用问题的囚犯的物质使用模式与犯罪类型之间的关系,特别是暴力罪犯的物质使用模式是否不同。方法:采用成瘾严重程度指数(Addiction Severity Index)对有药物使用问题的在押人员(N= 4202人,平均年龄33.5岁,SD 9.8)的访谈数据,与判决书中主要犯罪类型的刑事登记数据进行比对。结果:在二元分析中,与获取性犯罪和毒品犯罪相比,暴力罪犯的非法毒品和无家可归率较低,但酗酒和使用镇静剂的比例高于毒品犯罪。与所有其他犯罪相比,有暴力犯罪的客户注射毒品的流行率较低。在逻辑回归中,酗酒和镇静剂与暴力犯罪呈正相关(与非暴力犯罪相反),而海洛因、安非他明、可卡因和注射毒品与暴力犯罪呈负相关。仅在暴力犯罪者中,镇静剂倾向于与致命暴力相关(p=0.06),而安非他明、无家可归、年龄和海洛因(p= 0.05)与致命暴力呈负相关,而非致命暴力。结论:对使用药物的暴力犯罪者的治疗和风险评估可能需要特别注意镇静剂和酒精。这项研究的局限性在于自我报告和横断面数据,因为这里研究的大多数监狱样本是男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Patient Perceived Impact of Outpatient Group Substance Use Disorder Treatment in a Hybrid Model or Virtual-Only Model Relative to In-Person Delivery. Enhancing Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: An Economic Evaluation of Improving Medication Adherence for Buprenorphine Through Blister-Packaging. A Framework for a New Paradigm of Opioid Drug Tapering Using Adjunct Drugs. Incidence, Timing and Social Correlates of the Development of Opioid Use Disorder Among Clients Seeking Treatment for an Alcohol Use Problem: Changes Over the Three Waves of the Opioid Epidemic. Community-Based Medications First for Opioid Use Disorder - Care Utilization and Mortality Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1