Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing integrative body-mind-spirit intervention and cognitive behavioral therapy in fostering quality of life of patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers.

Bobo Hi-Po Lau, Amy Y M Chow, Daniel F K Wong, Jessie S M Chan, Celia H Y Chan, Rainbow T H Ho, Tsz-Him So, Tai-Chung Lam, Victor Ho-Fun Lee, Anne W M Lee, Sau Fong Chow, Cecilia L W Chan
{"title":"Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing integrative body-mind-spirit intervention and cognitive behavioral therapy in fostering quality of life of patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers.","authors":"Bobo Hi-Po Lau,&nbsp;Amy Y M Chow,&nbsp;Daniel F K Wong,&nbsp;Jessie S M Chan,&nbsp;Celia H Y Chan,&nbsp;Rainbow T H Ho,&nbsp;Tsz-Him So,&nbsp;Tai-Chung Lam,&nbsp;Victor Ho-Fun Lee,&nbsp;Anne W M Lee,&nbsp;Sau Fong Chow,&nbsp;Cecilia L W Chan","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2018.1435325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compared to cancers at other sites, lung cancer often results in greater psychosocial distress to both the patients and their caregivers, due to the poor prognosis and survival rate, as well as the heavy symptom burden. In recent years, making protocols of proposed or on-going studies publicly available via clinical trial registries and/or peer-reviewed journals has benefited health sciences with timely communication of the latest research trends and improved transparency in reporting. However, such practice is yet to be a common sight in evidence-informed social work. Hence, this paper discusses the value of publishing protocols in social work research and presents the protocol of a randomized controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy for enhancing quality of life of patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers. The data collection process was still on-going at the time of manuscript submission.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"15 3","pages":"258-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2018.1435325","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2018.1435325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Compared to cancers at other sites, lung cancer often results in greater psychosocial distress to both the patients and their caregivers, due to the poor prognosis and survival rate, as well as the heavy symptom burden. In recent years, making protocols of proposed or on-going studies publicly available via clinical trial registries and/or peer-reviewed journals has benefited health sciences with timely communication of the latest research trends and improved transparency in reporting. However, such practice is yet to be a common sight in evidence-informed social work. Hence, this paper discusses the value of publishing protocols in social work research and presents the protocol of a randomized controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy for enhancing quality of life of patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers. The data collection process was still on-going at the time of manuscript submission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项比较综合身心精神干预和认知行为治疗在提高肺癌患者及其家庭照顾者生活质量方面的随机对照试验研究方案。
与其他部位的癌症相比,由于预后差、生存率低以及症状负担重,肺癌往往给患者及其护理人员带来更大的心理社会困扰。近年来,通过临床试验登记和(或)同行评议期刊公开提供拟议的或正在进行的研究的规程,使健康科学受益,及时通报最新研究趋势,提高报告的透明度。然而,这种做法在循证社会工作中尚不常见。因此,本文讨论了在社会工作研究中发表协议的价值,并提出了一项随机对照试验的协议,该试验比较了身心精神综合干预与认知行为治疗在提高肺癌患者及其家庭照顾者生活质量方面的有效性。在提交稿件时,数据收集过程仍在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Freeing Chinese Abused Women From Stereotype: A Pretest-Posttest Comparison Study on Group Intervention in Refuge Centers. Making and sustaining change from psychotherapy: A mixed methods study. Toward evidence-based anti-human trafficking policy: a rapid review of CSE rehabilitation and evaluation of Indian legislation. Developing your communication skills in social work. The new social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1