Making and sustaining change from psychotherapy: A mixed methods study.

David Roseborough, Nancy Bottorff, Kelsi Dankey, Tricia Downing, Danae Hoffman, Heather Karson, Sara Lemon, Natia Wilcek, Arielle Yahnke
{"title":"Making and sustaining change from psychotherapy: A mixed methods study.","authors":"David Roseborough,&nbsp;Nancy Bottorff,&nbsp;Kelsi Dankey,&nbsp;Tricia Downing,&nbsp;Danae Hoffman,&nbsp;Heather Karson,&nbsp;Sara Lemon,&nbsp;Natia Wilcek,&nbsp;Arielle Yahnke","doi":"10.1080/23761407.2018.1517069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored both how changes are made and what encourages the maintenance of change after psychotherapy, from the perspective of a sample of former clients, using a mixed methods sequential design. Wampold & Imel's (2015) contextual model was used as a conceptual framework. Using secondary data analysis, quantitative analysis was used to explore the degree to which clients made and maintained progress from pretest to post test and 12 to 18 month follow-up. Fourteen interviews were used to hear from former clients about their impressions of what supported their efforts at change and how they maintained these gains post treatment. The findings of the quantitative strand demonstrated clinically meaningful change from pretest to follow-up, using a 1 x 3 repeated measures ANOVA. Qualitative themes emerged in response to questions asking about: what facilitates change, what participants do to maintain changes, and what characterized clinical relationships that did and did not go well.</p>","PeriodicalId":90893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","volume":"15 6","pages":"649-675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23761407.2018.1517069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-informed social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2018.1517069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored both how changes are made and what encourages the maintenance of change after psychotherapy, from the perspective of a sample of former clients, using a mixed methods sequential design. Wampold & Imel's (2015) contextual model was used as a conceptual framework. Using secondary data analysis, quantitative analysis was used to explore the degree to which clients made and maintained progress from pretest to post test and 12 to 18 month follow-up. Fourteen interviews were used to hear from former clients about their impressions of what supported their efforts at change and how they maintained these gains post treatment. The findings of the quantitative strand demonstrated clinically meaningful change from pretest to follow-up, using a 1 x 3 repeated measures ANOVA. Qualitative themes emerged in response to questions asking about: what facilitates change, what participants do to maintain changes, and what characterized clinical relationships that did and did not go well.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从心理治疗中产生和维持改变:一项混合方法研究。
本研究从前客户样本的角度出发,采用混合方法顺序设计,探讨了心理治疗后如何产生变化以及鼓励保持变化的因素。Wampold & Imel(2015)的语境模型被用作概念框架。采用二次数据分析,定量分析从测试前到测试后以及随访12 ~ 18个月,患者取得和保持进步的程度。14个访谈被用来听取前客户关于他们的印象是什么支持他们的努力改变,以及他们如何在治疗后保持这些成果。使用1 × 3重复测量方差分析,定量链的结果显示从前测到随访有临床意义的变化。在回答以下问题时,出现了定性主题:什么促进了变化,参与者如何保持变化,以及临床关系进展顺利和不顺利的特征是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Freeing Chinese Abused Women From Stereotype: A Pretest-Posttest Comparison Study on Group Intervention in Refuge Centers. Making and sustaining change from psychotherapy: A mixed methods study. Toward evidence-based anti-human trafficking policy: a rapid review of CSE rehabilitation and evaluation of Indian legislation. Developing your communication skills in social work. The new social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1