Review of Fluoride Intake and Appropriateness of Current Guidelines.

Q1 Medicine Advances in Dental Research Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.1177/0022034517750850
M A R Buzalaf
{"title":"Review of Fluoride Intake and Appropriateness of Current Guidelines.","authors":"M A R Buzalaf","doi":"10.1177/0022034517750850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the classical epidemiological studies by Dean, it has been known that there should be an optimum level of exposure to fluoride that would be able to provide the maximum protection against caries, with minimum dental fluorosis. The \"optimal\" daily intake of fluoride for children (0.05-0.07 mg per kilogram bodyweight) that is still accepted worldwide was empirically determined. In the present review, we discuss the appropriateness of the current guidance for fluoride intake, in light of the windows of susceptibility to caries and fluorosis, the modern trends of fluoride intake from multiple sources, individual variations in fluoride metabolism, and recent epidemiological data. The main conclusion is that it is very difficult to think about a strict recommendation for an \"optimal\" range of fluoride intake at the individual level in light of existing knowledge of 1) the mechanisms of action of fluoride to control caries, 2) the mechanisms involved in dental fluorosis development, 3) the distinct factors that interfere in the metabolism of fluoride, and 4) the windows of susceptibility to both dental caries and fluorosis development. An \"optimal\" range of fluoride intake is, however, desirable at the population level to guide programs of community fluoridation, but further research is necessary to provide additional support for future decisions on guidance in this area. This list includes the effect of factors affecting fluoride metabolism, clinical trials on the effectiveness of low-fluoride dentifrices to prevent caries in the primary dentition, and validation of biomarkers of exposure to fluoride.</p>","PeriodicalId":7300,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dental Research","volume":"29 2","pages":"157-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0022034517750850","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517750850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Since the classical epidemiological studies by Dean, it has been known that there should be an optimum level of exposure to fluoride that would be able to provide the maximum protection against caries, with minimum dental fluorosis. The "optimal" daily intake of fluoride for children (0.05-0.07 mg per kilogram bodyweight) that is still accepted worldwide was empirically determined. In the present review, we discuss the appropriateness of the current guidance for fluoride intake, in light of the windows of susceptibility to caries and fluorosis, the modern trends of fluoride intake from multiple sources, individual variations in fluoride metabolism, and recent epidemiological data. The main conclusion is that it is very difficult to think about a strict recommendation for an "optimal" range of fluoride intake at the individual level in light of existing knowledge of 1) the mechanisms of action of fluoride to control caries, 2) the mechanisms involved in dental fluorosis development, 3) the distinct factors that interfere in the metabolism of fluoride, and 4) the windows of susceptibility to both dental caries and fluorosis development. An "optimal" range of fluoride intake is, however, desirable at the population level to guide programs of community fluoridation, but further research is necessary to provide additional support for future decisions on guidance in this area. This list includes the effect of factors affecting fluoride metabolism, clinical trials on the effectiveness of low-fluoride dentifrices to prevent caries in the primary dentition, and validation of biomarkers of exposure to fluoride.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对氟化物摄入量的审查和现行指南的适当性。
自从迪恩的经典流行病学研究以来,人们已经知道应该有一个最佳的氟化物暴露水平,能够提供最大限度的预防龋齿,最小限度的氟斑牙。儿童的“最佳”每日氟化物摄入量(每公斤体重0.05-0.07毫克)仍然是世界范围内公认的经验确定的。在本综述中,我们根据龋齿和氟中毒的易感性窗口,从多种来源摄入氟的现代趋势,氟代谢的个体差异以及最近的流行病学数据,讨论当前氟摄入指南的适当性。主要结论是,根据现有的知识(1)氟化物控制龋齿的作用机制,(2)氟斑牙发生的机制,(3)干扰氟化物代谢的不同因素,以及(4)蛀牙和氟斑牙发生的易感窗口),很难在个人层面上严格推荐“最佳”氟化物摄入量范围。然而,在人口水平上,一个“最佳”氟化物摄入量范围是理想的,以指导社区氟化方案,但需要进一步的研究,为今后在这一领域的指导决策提供额外的支持。该清单包括影响氟化物代谢的因素的影响,低氟化物牙膏预防初级牙列龋齿有效性的临床试验,以及氟暴露的生物标志物的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Dental Research
Advances in Dental Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women in Dental Clinical and Translational Research. Geroscience: Aging and Oral Health Research. Commentary: Challenges and Opportunities for Women in Dental Research Then and Now—A Look Inside the Lives of 11 Women Presidents of the IADR Women Recipients of IADR Distinguished Scientist Awards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1