Effectiveness of photographs of study models for IOTN scoring.

Q Medicine Australian Orthodontic Journal Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Ovais H Malik, Helen Stevenson, N A Mandall, Mubarak A Alsaeed
{"title":"Effectiveness of photographs of study models for IOTN scoring.","authors":"Ovais H Malik,&nbsp;Helen Stevenson,&nbsp;N A Mandall,&nbsp;Mubarak A Alsaeed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim'of the present study was to investigate whether the same orthodontic information can be obtained from study models or photographs of study models in order to assess the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). The study also aimed to assess inter- and intra-examiner reliability in the assessment of orthodontic treatment need.</p><p><strong>Sample: </strong>Thirty sets of start and finish study models, demonstrating a range of malocclusions, were non-randomly obtained from patients treated at the University of Manchester Dental Hospital. The start models demonstrated a range of malocclusions (according to The British Standard Institute Incisor Classification 1983) of varying complexity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Six photographic views of each set of study models were taken against a dark background. Millimetric distances were determined by using dividers to measure photographic distances and actual distances in millimeters from a ruler embedded in the image. Four examiners assessed the study models and photographs of the models in a random order and the Aesthetic and Dental Health components of the IOTN were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in the IOTN scores from photographs of study models compared with IOTN scoresrom study models of the same patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IOTN scores derived from photographs of study models are valid and reliable measures of malocclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":55417,"journal":{"name":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"32 2","pages":"221-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim'of the present study was to investigate whether the same orthodontic information can be obtained from study models or photographs of study models in order to assess the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). The study also aimed to assess inter- and intra-examiner reliability in the assessment of orthodontic treatment need.

Sample: Thirty sets of start and finish study models, demonstrating a range of malocclusions, were non-randomly obtained from patients treated at the University of Manchester Dental Hospital. The start models demonstrated a range of malocclusions (according to The British Standard Institute Incisor Classification 1983) of varying complexity.

Method: Six photographic views of each set of study models were taken against a dark background. Millimetric distances were determined by using dividers to measure photographic distances and actual distances in millimeters from a ruler embedded in the image. Four examiners assessed the study models and photographs of the models in a random order and the Aesthetic and Dental Health components of the IOTN were recorded.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the IOTN scores from photographs of study models compared with IOTN scoresrom study models of the same patient.

Conclusion: The IOTN scores derived from photographs of study models are valid and reliable measures of malocclusion.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究模型照片对IOTN评分的有效性。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨是否可以从研究模型或研究模型的照片中获得相同的正畸信息,以评估正畸治疗需求指数(IOTN)。该研究还旨在评估正畸治疗需求评估的检查员之间和检查员内部的可靠性。样本:从曼彻斯特大学牙科医院接受治疗的患者中非随机获得30组开始和结束研究模型,展示了一系列错颌。最初的模型显示了一系列复杂程度不同的错咬合(根据1983年英国标准学会门牙分类)。方法:每组研究模型在暗背景下拍摄6张照片。毫米距离是通过使用分割器测量照片距离和实际距离来确定的,以毫米为单位,从嵌入图像的尺子开始。四名审查员以随机顺序评估了研究模型和模型的照片,并记录了IOTN的美学和牙齿健康部分。结果:研究模型照片的IOTN评分与同一患者研究模型的IOTN评分比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:由研究模型的照片得出的IOTN评分是一种有效、可靠的错牙合测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Orthodontic Journal
Australian Orthodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.48
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Minimizing publication bias. Looking backwards into the Future of Orthodontics. Orthodontic Education. Australian Orthodontists: are they "with it". The role of the foundation in Australian Orthodontic education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1