Position paper on olfactory dysfunction.

T Hummel, K L Whitcroft, P Andrews, A Altundag, C Cinghi, R M Costanzo, M Damm, J Frasnelli, H Gudziol, N Gupta, A Haehne, E Holbrook, S C Hong, D Hornung, K B Hüttenbrink, R Kamel, M Kobayashi, I Konstantinidis, B N Landis, D A Leopold, A Macchi, T Miwa, R Moesges, J Mullol, C A Mueller, G Ottaviano, G C Passali, C Philpott, J M Pinto, V J Ramakrishnan, P Rombaux, Y Roth, R A Schlosser, B Shu, G Soler, P Stjärne, B A Stuck, J Vodicka, A Welge-Luessen
{"title":"Position paper on olfactory dysfunction.","authors":"T Hummel,&nbsp;K L Whitcroft,&nbsp;P Andrews,&nbsp;A Altundag,&nbsp;C Cinghi,&nbsp;R M Costanzo,&nbsp;M Damm,&nbsp;J Frasnelli,&nbsp;H Gudziol,&nbsp;N Gupta,&nbsp;A Haehne,&nbsp;E Holbrook,&nbsp;S C Hong,&nbsp;D Hornung,&nbsp;K B Hüttenbrink,&nbsp;R Kamel,&nbsp;M Kobayashi,&nbsp;I Konstantinidis,&nbsp;B N Landis,&nbsp;D A Leopold,&nbsp;A Macchi,&nbsp;T Miwa,&nbsp;R Moesges,&nbsp;J Mullol,&nbsp;C A Mueller,&nbsp;G Ottaviano,&nbsp;G C Passali,&nbsp;C Philpott,&nbsp;J M Pinto,&nbsp;V J Ramakrishnan,&nbsp;P Rombaux,&nbsp;Y Roth,&nbsp;R A Schlosser,&nbsp;B Shu,&nbsp;G Soler,&nbsp;P Stjärne,&nbsp;B A Stuck,&nbsp;J Vodicka,&nbsp;A Welge-Luessen","doi":"10.4193/Rhino16.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olfactory dysfunction is an increasingly recognised condition, associated with reduced quality of life and major\nhealth outcomes such as neurodegeneration and death. However, translational research in this field is limited by heterogeneity in methodological approach, including definitions of impairment, improvement and appropriate assessment techniques. Accordingly, effective treatments for smell loss are limited. In an effort to encourage high quality and comparable work in this field, among others, we propose the following ideas and recommendations. Whilst the full set of recommendations are outlined in the main document, points include the following:\n• Patients with suspected olfactory loss should undergo a full examination of the head and neck, including rigid nasal endoscopy\nwith small diameter endoscopes.\n• Subjective olfactory assessment should not be undertaken in isolation, given its poor reliability.\n• Psychophysical assessment tools used in clinical and research settings should include reliable and validated tests of odour\nthreshold, and/or one of odour identification or discrimination.\n• Comprehensive chemosensory assessment should include gustatory screening.\n• Smell training can be helpful in patients with olfactory loss of several aetiologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We hope the current manuscript will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency and generalisability of work in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":77364,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology. Supplement","volume":"54 26","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4193/Rhino16.248","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhino16.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Olfactory dysfunction is an increasingly recognised condition, associated with reduced quality of life and major health outcomes such as neurodegeneration and death. However, translational research in this field is limited by heterogeneity in methodological approach, including definitions of impairment, improvement and appropriate assessment techniques. Accordingly, effective treatments for smell loss are limited. In an effort to encourage high quality and comparable work in this field, among others, we propose the following ideas and recommendations. Whilst the full set of recommendations are outlined in the main document, points include the following: • Patients with suspected olfactory loss should undergo a full examination of the head and neck, including rigid nasal endoscopy with small diameter endoscopes. • Subjective olfactory assessment should not be undertaken in isolation, given its poor reliability. • Psychophysical assessment tools used in clinical and research settings should include reliable and validated tests of odour threshold, and/or one of odour identification or discrimination. • Comprehensive chemosensory assessment should include gustatory screening. • Smell training can be helpful in patients with olfactory loss of several aetiologies.

Conclusions: We hope the current manuscript will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency and generalisability of work in this field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗅觉功能障碍意见书。
背景:嗅觉功能障碍是一种越来越被认可的疾病,与生活质量下降和主要健康结果(如神经变性和死亡)相关。然而,该领域的翻译研究受到方法方法的异质性的限制,包括损害的定义,改进和适当的评估技术。因此,对嗅觉丧失的有效治疗是有限的。为了鼓励在这一领域开展高质量和可比较的工作,除其他外,我们提出以下想法和建议。虽然在主要文件中概述了整套建议,但要点包括以下内容:•疑似嗅觉丧失的患者应接受头部和颈部的全面检查,包括使用小直径内窥镜进行刚性鼻内窥镜检查。•不应孤立地进行主观嗅觉评估,因为其可靠性较差。•临床和研究环境中使用的心理物理评估工具应包括可靠和有效的气味阈值测试和/或气味识别或辨别测试。•综合化学感觉评估应包括味觉筛查。•嗅觉训练对因多种原因导致嗅觉丧失的患者有帮助。结论:我们希望当前的手稿将鼓励临床医生和研究人员采用一种共同的语言,并以此来提高该领域工作的方法学质量、一致性和普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Position paper on olfactory dysfunction. European position paper on the anatomical terminology of the internal nose and paranasal sinuses. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. 4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR)--basics and practice 2010.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1