Policies Regarding Sexual Expression in Spanish Long-Term Care Facilities for Older People

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2018-03-12 DOI:10.1111/jgs.15345
Montserrat Celdrán DPsy, Feliciano Villar DPsy, Rodrigo Serrat DPsy, Josep Fabà DPsy, Teresa Martínez DHealthSci
{"title":"Policies Regarding Sexual Expression in Spanish Long-Term Care Facilities for Older People","authors":"Montserrat Celdrán DPsy,&nbsp;Feliciano Villar DPsy,&nbsp;Rodrigo Serrat DPsy,&nbsp;Josep Fabà DPsy,&nbsp;Teresa Martínez DHealthSci","doi":"10.1111/jgs.15345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the last few years, there has been increasing interest in the sexual rights and sexual expression of older people living in long-term care facilities (LTCFs).<span>1-4</span> Although many of these studies conclude that institutions should implement explicit policies designed to deal with residents' sexual rights,<span>5</span> little is known about the frequency with which these policies are implemented and what kinds of policies are the most popular.</p><p>The few studies published to date, all coming from Anglo-Saxon countries, suggest that these policies are rarely implemented, which may represent a barrier to residents' sexual expression. For instance, one study found that, although most facilities claimed to have a general policy regarding dignity and respect for residents' rights, just 10% of the 198 participant nursing homes specifically mentioned sexuality within these rights.<span>6</span> Similarly, another study found that two-thirds of 366 nursing homes surveyed did not have a policy regarding residents' sexual expression, even though most of them recognized that there had been problems regarding residents' sexual expression in their facilities.<span>7</span></p><p>We conducted a study to explore the presence and nature of sexual expression policies at LTCFs in Spain. We contacted directors of nursing (DONs) at LTCFs in different Spanish autonomous communities to explain the objectives of the study and to outline the procedure for data collection. Of the 245 who agreed to participate, 152 returned the completed questionnaire (62% response rate). The University of Barcelona ethics committee approved and supervised the entire process.</p><p>Participants completed a self-administrated 26-item inventory, each item addressing a sex-related policy and selected from the SexAT questionnaire.<span>8</span> Specifically, 4 experts (1 DON, 1 psychologist working at a LTCF for older people, 1 head of a regional social service agency in charge of supervising LTCFs, 1 member of the research team) rated each SexAT item in terms of its importance for protecting residents' sexual rights and its relevance in the Spanish context. The 26 items (of the original 69) that consistently presented the highest scores were included in the final version of the inventory. These items were grouped into 4 areas (explicit rights guaranteed, staff practices and behavior, facilitating resources and materials, training and information) according to their content, and their order was randomized. For each item, participants were asked to indicate whether the policy was implemented at their LTCF.</p><p>We calculated the percentage of institutions at which each policy was included in the inventory, as well as the mean percentage of policies implemented, for each content dimension and in total. We found greater diversity between policies (Table 1). Although at least 8 of 10 LTCFs implemented some (particularly those related to the explicit recognition of sexual rights and sexual diversity), others were hardly present at all in 40% of centers, such as availability of sexual aids or policies related to training and information. There were important differences in the frequency of items included under each dimension. So, although the presence of sexual behavior policies at Spanish LTCFs seems to be higher than reported in previous studies, it is an area in which institutions need to improve.</p><p>Any interpretation of the results of the present study should take into account its limitations. First, our sample was obtained using a nonprobability procedure and from a single country, which limits the generalizability of the results. Second, the presence or absence of policies was derived from DONs' reports and not from objective measures; the potential influence of social desirability, which may have caused respondents to overestimate the implementation of policies, should be taken into account.</p><p>Our findings suggest that, although formal recognition of sexual rights and diversity seems to be the norm, specific policies are still not generalized in Spanish LTCFs, so there is still much room for improvement in this field, particularly in areas such as training and availability of resources and materials. The inventory used in this study could be useful for management and staff to establish which policies are implemented and how practices in this area might be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"66 5","pages":"1044-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jgs.15345","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.15345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the last few years, there has been increasing interest in the sexual rights and sexual expression of older people living in long-term care facilities (LTCFs).1-4 Although many of these studies conclude that institutions should implement explicit policies designed to deal with residents' sexual rights,5 little is known about the frequency with which these policies are implemented and what kinds of policies are the most popular.

The few studies published to date, all coming from Anglo-Saxon countries, suggest that these policies are rarely implemented, which may represent a barrier to residents' sexual expression. For instance, one study found that, although most facilities claimed to have a general policy regarding dignity and respect for residents' rights, just 10% of the 198 participant nursing homes specifically mentioned sexuality within these rights.6 Similarly, another study found that two-thirds of 366 nursing homes surveyed did not have a policy regarding residents' sexual expression, even though most of them recognized that there had been problems regarding residents' sexual expression in their facilities.7

We conducted a study to explore the presence and nature of sexual expression policies at LTCFs in Spain. We contacted directors of nursing (DONs) at LTCFs in different Spanish autonomous communities to explain the objectives of the study and to outline the procedure for data collection. Of the 245 who agreed to participate, 152 returned the completed questionnaire (62% response rate). The University of Barcelona ethics committee approved and supervised the entire process.

Participants completed a self-administrated 26-item inventory, each item addressing a sex-related policy and selected from the SexAT questionnaire.8 Specifically, 4 experts (1 DON, 1 psychologist working at a LTCF for older people, 1 head of a regional social service agency in charge of supervising LTCFs, 1 member of the research team) rated each SexAT item in terms of its importance for protecting residents' sexual rights and its relevance in the Spanish context. The 26 items (of the original 69) that consistently presented the highest scores were included in the final version of the inventory. These items were grouped into 4 areas (explicit rights guaranteed, staff practices and behavior, facilitating resources and materials, training and information) according to their content, and their order was randomized. For each item, participants were asked to indicate whether the policy was implemented at their LTCF.

We calculated the percentage of institutions at which each policy was included in the inventory, as well as the mean percentage of policies implemented, for each content dimension and in total. We found greater diversity between policies (Table 1). Although at least 8 of 10 LTCFs implemented some (particularly those related to the explicit recognition of sexual rights and sexual diversity), others were hardly present at all in 40% of centers, such as availability of sexual aids or policies related to training and information. There were important differences in the frequency of items included under each dimension. So, although the presence of sexual behavior policies at Spanish LTCFs seems to be higher than reported in previous studies, it is an area in which institutions need to improve.

Any interpretation of the results of the present study should take into account its limitations. First, our sample was obtained using a nonprobability procedure and from a single country, which limits the generalizability of the results. Second, the presence or absence of policies was derived from DONs' reports and not from objective measures; the potential influence of social desirability, which may have caused respondents to overestimate the implementation of policies, should be taken into account.

Our findings suggest that, although formal recognition of sexual rights and diversity seems to be the norm, specific policies are still not generalized in Spanish LTCFs, so there is still much room for improvement in this field, particularly in areas such as training and availability of resources and materials. The inventory used in this study could be useful for management and staff to establish which policies are implemented and how practices in this area might be improved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙老年人长期护理机构中有关性表达的政策
在过去几年中,人们对生活在长期护理设施(ltcf)中的老年人的性权利和性表达越来越感兴趣。1-4尽管许多研究得出结论,机构应该实施明确的政策来处理居民的性权利,但很少有人知道这些政策的实施频率,以及哪种政策最受欢迎。迄今为止发表的少数研究都来自盎格鲁-撒克逊国家,表明这些政策很少得到实施,这可能是居民性表达的障碍。例如,一项研究发现,尽管大多数机构声称有关于尊严和尊重居民权利的一般政策,但在198个参与的养老院中,只有10%特别提到了这些权利中的性行为同样,另一项研究发现,在接受调查的366家养老院中,有三分之二的养老院没有关于居民性表达的政策,尽管它们中的大多数都认识到,在他们的设施中,居民的性表达存在问题。我们进行了一项研究,以探讨西班牙ltcf中性表达政策的存在和性质。我们联系了不同西班牙自治区ltcf的护理主任(DONs),解释了研究的目标并概述了数据收集的程序。在245名同意参与的人中,有152人提交了完整的问卷(62%的回复率)。巴塞罗那大学伦理委员会批准并监督了整个过程。参与者完成了一份自我管理的26项清单,每一项都涉及与性别有关的政策,并从SexAT问卷中选择具体来说,4位专家(1位DON, 1位在老年人长期服务中心工作的心理学家,1位负责监督长期服务中心的地区社会服务机构负责人,1位研究小组成员)根据其对保护居民性权利的重要性及其在西班牙背景下的相关性对每个SexAT项目进行评级。在最初的69个项目中,得分最高的26个项目被包括在最终版本的清单中。这些项目根据内容分为明确权利保障、员工实践与行为、便利资源与材料、培训与信息4个方面,顺序随机化。对于每个项目,参与者被要求指出该政策是否在他们的长期基金中实施。我们计算了每项政策被纳入清单的机构的百分比,以及每个内容维度和总体上实施的政策的平均百分比。我们发现政策之间的差异更大(表1)。尽管10个ltcf中至少有8个实施了一些政策(特别是那些与明确承认性权利和性多样性有关的政策),但在40%的中心中,其他政策几乎不存在,例如性援助的可用性或与培训和信息相关的政策。在每个维度下包含的项目的频率有重要差异。因此,尽管西班牙ltcf的性行为政策的存在似乎比以前的研究报告要高,但这是机构需要改进的领域。对本研究结果的任何解释都应考虑到其局限性。首先,我们的样本是使用非概率程序获得的,并且来自单个国家,这限制了结果的可泛化性。其次,政策的存在与否来自于don的报告,而不是客观的衡量标准;应考虑到社会期望的潜在影响,这可能导致答复者高估政策的执行情况。我们的研究结果表明,尽管对性权利和多样性的正式承认似乎是常态,但具体政策在西班牙ltcf中仍然没有推广,因此在这一领域仍有很大的改进空间,特别是在培训和资源和材料的可用性等方面。本研究中使用的清单可能有助于管理部门和工作人员确定执行了哪些政策以及如何改进这方面的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
NOTICES Issue Information Cover A Thank You to JAGS Reviewers The Role of Brain Structure in Explaining Physical Functioning in Male Veterans With Impaired Kidney Function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1