Innovation Implementation in the Context of Hospital QI: Lessons Learned and Strategies for Success.

Innovation and entrepreneurship in health Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-02-21 DOI:10.2147/IEH.S151040
Pavani Rangachari
{"title":"Innovation Implementation in the Context of Hospital QI: Lessons Learned and Strategies for Success.","authors":"Pavani Rangachari","doi":"10.2147/IEH.S151040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1999, the Institute of Medicine reported that 98,000 people die each year due to medical errors. In the following years, the focus on hospital quality was intensified nationally, with policymakers providing evidence-based practice guidelines for improving health care quality. However, these innovations (evidence-based guidelines) that were being produced at policy levels were not translating to clinical practice at the hospital organizational level easily, and stark variations continued to persist, in the quality of health care. Circa 2009, nearly a decade after the release of the IOM report, the health care organizational literature began referring to this challenge as \"innovation implementation failure\" in health care organizations (HCOs), ie, failure to implement an evidence-based practice that is new to a HCO. This stream of literature drew upon management research to explain why innovation implementation failure occurs in HCOs and what could be done to prevent it. This paper conducts an integrative review of the literature on \"innovation implementation\" in hospitals and health systems over the last decade, since the spotlight was cast on \"innovation implementation failure\" in HCOs. The review reveals that while some studies have retrospectively sought to identify the key drivers of innovation implementation, through surveys and interviews of practitioners (the \"what\"), other studies have prospectively sought to understand how innovation implementation occurs in hospitals and health systems (the \"how\"). Both make distinctive contributions to identifying strategies for success in innovation implementation. While retrospective studies have helped identify the key drivers of innovation implementation, prospective studies have shed light on how these drivers could be attained, thereby helping to develop context-sensitive management strategies for success. The literature has called for more prospective research on the implementation and sustainability of health care innovations. This paper summarizes the lessons learned from the literature, discusses the relevance of management research on innovation implementation in HCOs, and identifies future research avenues.</p>","PeriodicalId":92213,"journal":{"name":"Innovation and entrepreneurship in health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/IEH.S151040","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation and entrepreneurship in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IEH.S151040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In 1999, the Institute of Medicine reported that 98,000 people die each year due to medical errors. In the following years, the focus on hospital quality was intensified nationally, with policymakers providing evidence-based practice guidelines for improving health care quality. However, these innovations (evidence-based guidelines) that were being produced at policy levels were not translating to clinical practice at the hospital organizational level easily, and stark variations continued to persist, in the quality of health care. Circa 2009, nearly a decade after the release of the IOM report, the health care organizational literature began referring to this challenge as "innovation implementation failure" in health care organizations (HCOs), ie, failure to implement an evidence-based practice that is new to a HCO. This stream of literature drew upon management research to explain why innovation implementation failure occurs in HCOs and what could be done to prevent it. This paper conducts an integrative review of the literature on "innovation implementation" in hospitals and health systems over the last decade, since the spotlight was cast on "innovation implementation failure" in HCOs. The review reveals that while some studies have retrospectively sought to identify the key drivers of innovation implementation, through surveys and interviews of practitioners (the "what"), other studies have prospectively sought to understand how innovation implementation occurs in hospitals and health systems (the "how"). Both make distinctive contributions to identifying strategies for success in innovation implementation. While retrospective studies have helped identify the key drivers of innovation implementation, prospective studies have shed light on how these drivers could be attained, thereby helping to develop context-sensitive management strategies for success. The literature has called for more prospective research on the implementation and sustainability of health care innovations. This paper summarizes the lessons learned from the literature, discusses the relevance of management research on innovation implementation in HCOs, and identifies future research avenues.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院质量管理的创新实施:经验教训和成功策略。
1999年,医学研究所报告说,每年有98000人死于医疗事故。在接下来的几年里,全国加强了对医院质量的关注,政策制定者为提高医疗质量提供了基于证据的实践指南。然而,这些在政策层面产生的创新(基于证据的指导方针)并没有轻易转化为医院组织层面的临床实践,而且在卫生保健质量方面仍然存在明显的差异。大约在2009年,也就是IOM报告发布近十年后,卫生保健组织文献开始将这一挑战称为卫生保健组织(HCO)中的“创新实施失败”,即未能实施对卫生保健组织来说是新的循证实践。这一文献流借鉴了管理研究来解释为什么创新实施失败发生在hco和可以做些什么来防止它。本文对过去十年医院和卫生系统“创新实施”的文献进行了综合回顾,因为人们关注的焦点是hco的“创新实施失败”。回顾表明,虽然一些研究通过对从业者的调查和访谈(“什么”)回顾性地试图确定创新实施的关键驱动因素,但其他研究则前瞻性地试图了解医院和卫生系统如何实施创新(“如何”)。两者都对确定成功实施创新的战略做出了独特的贡献。虽然回顾性研究有助于确定创新实施的关键驱动因素,但前瞻性研究揭示了如何实现这些驱动因素,从而有助于制定成功的环境敏感管理策略。文献呼吁对卫生保健创新的实施和可持续性进行更多的前瞻性研究。本文总结了从文献中获得的经验教训,讨论了管理研究与hco创新实施的相关性,并确定了未来的研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing a technology-based intervention for empowering cancer patients from low-income backgrounds: a lifecycle approach Elimination of preventable blindness: can success in Nepal be replicated in Africa? Socially assistive robots: current status and future prospects for autism interventions Innovation Implementation in the Context of Hospital QI: Lessons Learned and Strategies for Success. Smart implants in orthopedic surgery, improving patient outcomes: a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1