Pattern of social cognition deficits in individuals with borderline personality disorder

IF 4.5 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Asian journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2018.03.010
Anupama V , Poornima Bhola , Jagadisha Thirthalli , Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta
{"title":"Pattern of social cognition deficits in individuals with borderline personality disorder","authors":"Anupama V ,&nbsp;Poornima Bhola ,&nbsp;Jagadisha Thirthalli ,&nbsp;Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2018.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Social cognition deficits have been implicated in the affect regulation and interpersonal difficulties seen in borderline personality disorder (BPD). The study examined patterns of social cognition abilities, using self-report and task-based measures, among individuals diagnosed with BPD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The sample included a clinical group of 20 patients diagnosed with BPD and 20 age and gender-matched control group participants from the community with no psychiatric diagnosis. The measures included the Mentalization Questionnaire, the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test and the Social Cognition Rating Tool in Indian Setting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Results indicated that the clinical group had lower self-reported mentalizing ability. Facial emotion recognition ability was significantly lower for the clinical group, particularly for photographs of the eye region with positive and neutral valences. The clinical group had significantly higher personalizing bias, and greater difficulties in social perception. The two groups did not differ on first and second order theory of mind, recognition of faux pas and externalizing bias.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results point to the links between social cognition deficits and interpersonal difficulties among persons with BPD. Implications include the need for pre-therapy assessment of the magnitude and patterns of social cognition difficulties in BPD, the development of culturally and ecologically valid assessments and the evaluation of interventions for social cognition vulnerabilities among individuals with BPD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"33 ","pages":"Pages 105-112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ajp.2018.03.010","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201817307049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background

Social cognition deficits have been implicated in the affect regulation and interpersonal difficulties seen in borderline personality disorder (BPD). The study examined patterns of social cognition abilities, using self-report and task-based measures, among individuals diagnosed with BPD.

Methods

The sample included a clinical group of 20 patients diagnosed with BPD and 20 age and gender-matched control group participants from the community with no psychiatric diagnosis. The measures included the Mentalization Questionnaire, the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test and the Social Cognition Rating Tool in Indian Setting.

Results

Results indicated that the clinical group had lower self-reported mentalizing ability. Facial emotion recognition ability was significantly lower for the clinical group, particularly for photographs of the eye region with positive and neutral valences. The clinical group had significantly higher personalizing bias, and greater difficulties in social perception. The two groups did not differ on first and second order theory of mind, recognition of faux pas and externalizing bias.

Conclusions

The results point to the links between social cognition deficits and interpersonal difficulties among persons with BPD. Implications include the need for pre-therapy assessment of the magnitude and patterns of social cognition difficulties in BPD, the development of culturally and ecologically valid assessments and the evaluation of interventions for social cognition vulnerabilities among individuals with BPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘型人格障碍患者社会认知缺陷的模式
社会认知缺陷与边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的情感调节和人际关系困难有关。该研究利用自我报告和基于任务的测量方法,检查了被诊断为BPD的个体的社会认知能力模式。方法选取20例诊断为BPD的临床组和20例年龄和性别匹配的非精神病诊断的社区对照组。测量方法包括心理化问卷、眼读心术测试和印度社会认知评定工具。结果临床组自我报告的心理化能力较低。临床组的面部情绪识别能力明显较低,特别是对于眼睛区域的正面和中性的照片。临床组有较高的个体化偏倚,社会知觉困难较大。两组在一阶和二阶心理理论、失态认知和外化偏见上没有差异。结论BPD患者的社会认知缺陷与人际交往困难之间存在一定的联系。这意味着需要对BPD患者社会认知困难的程度和模式进行治疗前评估,开发文化和生态有效的评估,以及评估BPD患者社会认知脆弱性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the clinical gap in first-episode schizophrenia: Beyond the "early use paradox" of long-acting injectable antipsychotics. Efficacy of a social robot-assisted training for socio-cognitive and cognitive functions in Parkinson’s disease: A comparison with an active control group. Perinatal depression policies in China: A three-dimensional analysis with implications for low- and middle-income countries health systems Comment on The nature and correlates of childhood trauma in individuals at clinical-high risk (CHR) for psychosis: A cross-country study in Brazil, China and Turkey When ECT is not readily available: Pharmacological management of catatonia in a correctional medical facility in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1