Comparison of the antioxidant effects of carnosic acid and synthetic antioxidants on tara seed oil.

Q1 Chemistry Chemistry Central Journal Pub Date : 2018-04-04 DOI:10.1186/s13065-018-0387-4
Zhan-Jun Li, Feng-Jian Yang, Lei Yang, Yuan-Gang Zu
{"title":"Comparison of the antioxidant effects of carnosic acid and synthetic antioxidants on tara seed oil.","authors":"Zhan-Jun Li,&nbsp;Feng-Jian Yang,&nbsp;Lei Yang,&nbsp;Yuan-Gang Zu","doi":"10.1186/s13065-018-0387-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the present study, tara seed oil was obtained by supercritical fluid extraction and used to investigate the antioxidant strength of carnosic acid (CA) compared with conventional synthetic antioxidants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The antioxidants were added to the tara seed oil at 0.2 mg of antioxidant per gram of oil. The samples were then submitted to at 60 °C 15 days for an accelerated oxidation process, with samples taken regularly for analysis. After oxidation, the samples were analyzed to determine the peroxide value, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, conjugated diene content, and free fatty acid content. CA was investigated at three purity levels (CA20, CA60, CA99), and compared with three synthetic antioxidants (butylatedhydroxyanisole, butylatedhydroxytoluene, and tert-butylhydroquinone).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The oxidation indicators showed that CA was a strong antioxidant compared to the synthetic antioxidants. The antioxidant activities decreased in the order: tert-butylhydroquinone > CA99 > CA60 > CA20 > butylatedhydroxyanisole > butylatedhydroxytoluene. These results show that CA could be used to replace synthetic antioxidants in oil products, and should be safer for human consumption and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9842,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Central Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13065-018-0387-4","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Central Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-018-0387-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: In the present study, tara seed oil was obtained by supercritical fluid extraction and used to investigate the antioxidant strength of carnosic acid (CA) compared with conventional synthetic antioxidants.

Methods: The antioxidants were added to the tara seed oil at 0.2 mg of antioxidant per gram of oil. The samples were then submitted to at 60 °C 15 days for an accelerated oxidation process, with samples taken regularly for analysis. After oxidation, the samples were analyzed to determine the peroxide value, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, conjugated diene content, and free fatty acid content. CA was investigated at three purity levels (CA20, CA60, CA99), and compared with three synthetic antioxidants (butylatedhydroxyanisole, butylatedhydroxytoluene, and tert-butylhydroquinone).

Results: The oxidation indicators showed that CA was a strong antioxidant compared to the synthetic antioxidants. The antioxidant activities decreased in the order: tert-butylhydroquinone > CA99 > CA60 > CA20 > butylatedhydroxyanisole > butylatedhydroxytoluene. These results show that CA could be used to replace synthetic antioxidants in oil products, and should be safer for human consumption and the environment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼠尾草酸与合成抗氧化剂对塔拉籽油抗氧化效果的比较。
背景:采用超临界流体萃取法提取塔拉籽油,研究了鼠尾草酸(CA)与常规合成抗氧化剂的抗氧化强度。方法:以每克塔拉籽油0.2 mg的抗氧化剂添加到塔拉籽油中。然后将样品在60°C下进行15天的加速氧化过程,并定期采集样品进行分析。氧化后对样品进行分析,测定过氧化值、硫代巴比妥酸活性物质、共轭二烯含量和游离脂肪酸含量。在CA20、CA60、CA99三个纯度水平下研究了CA,并与三种合成抗氧化剂(丁缩羟基甲苯、丁缩羟基甲苯和叔丁基对苯二酚)进行了比较。结果:与合成抗氧化剂相比,CA具有较强的抗氧化性能。抗氧化活性的强弱顺序为:叔丁基对苯二酚> CA99 > CA60 > CA20 >丁基羟基甲苯>丁基羟基甲苯。这些结果表明,CA可以代替合成抗氧化剂用于石油产品中,并且对人类消费和环境更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemistry Central Journal
Chemistry Central Journal 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: BMC Chemistry is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers all articles in the broad field of chemistry, including research on fundamental concepts, new developments and the application of chemical sciences to broad range of research fields, industry, and other disciplines. It provides an inclusive platform for the dissemination and discussion of chemistry to aid the advancement of all areas of research. Sections: -Analytical Chemistry -Organic Chemistry -Environmental and Energy Chemistry -Agricultural and Food Chemistry -Inorganic Chemistry -Medicinal Chemistry -Physical Chemistry -Materials and Macromolecular Chemistry -Green and Sustainable Chemistry
期刊最新文献
Design, synthesis and biological potential of heterocyclic benzoxazole scaffolds as promising antimicrobial and anticancer agents. Regio and stereoselective synthesis of anticancer spirooxindolopyrrolidine embedded piperidone heterocyclic hybrids derived from one-pot cascade protocol. Augmentation of hepatoprotective potential of Aegle marmelos in combination with piperine in carbon tetrachloride model in wistar rats. Polyaniline/palladium nanohybrids for moisture and hydrogen detection. Benzoxazole derivatives: design, synthesis and biological evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1