[The effects of question types for introduction on substantive information provided by Japanese children in interviews].

Q4 Psychology Shinrigaku Kenkyu Pub Date : 2017-02-01 DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.88.15042
Yuki Fujiwara, Takayuki Miyadera, Eriko Kuhara, Juichi Kobayashi
{"title":"[The effects of question types for introduction on substantive information provided by Japanese children in interviews].","authors":"Yuki Fujiwara,&nbsp;Takayuki Miyadera,&nbsp;Eriko Kuhara,&nbsp;Juichi Kobayashi","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.88.15042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of two introductory styles on substantive information provided by Japanese children were investigated. Children aged 5–6 years (n = 42) and 7–8 years (n = 40) took a simulated physical examination. One week later, the participants were interviewed about the examination in a narrative introductory condition using open-ended questions, or a non-narrative introductory condition using directive and yes/no questions. Substantive information provided by the children in the two conditions was compared. Results indicated that in the narrative condition, the participants provided more accurate information about the examination in response to open-ended questions. Additionally, the 7–8 year-old children in the narrative condition provided a wider range of critical information. These findings suggest that an open-ended introductory style is effective in eliciting more accurate information from children, including preschoolers, and more varied information from school-age children.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4992/jjpsy.88.15042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.88.15042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of two introductory styles on substantive information provided by Japanese children were investigated. Children aged 5–6 years (n = 42) and 7–8 years (n = 40) took a simulated physical examination. One week later, the participants were interviewed about the examination in a narrative introductory condition using open-ended questions, or a non-narrative introductory condition using directive and yes/no questions. Substantive information provided by the children in the two conditions was compared. Results indicated that in the narrative condition, the participants provided more accurate information about the examination in response to open-ended questions. Additionally, the 7–8 year-old children in the narrative condition provided a wider range of critical information. These findings suggest that an open-ended introductory style is effective in eliciting more accurate information from children, including preschoolers, and more varied information from school-age children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[问题类型对访谈中日本儿童提供的实质性信息的影响]。
研究了两种介绍方式对日本儿童提供的实质性信息的影响。5 ~ 6岁儿童(n = 42)和7 ~ 8岁儿童(n = 40)进行模拟体检。一周后,参与者在叙述性介绍性条件下接受了关于考试的采访,使用开放式问题,或者在非叙述性介绍性条件下使用指示和是/否问题。比较两种情况下儿童提供的实质性信息。结果表明,在叙述条件下,参与者在回答开放式问题时提供了更准确的考试信息。此外,7-8岁儿童在叙述条件下提供了更广泛的关键信息。这些发现表明,开放式的介绍风格可以有效地从儿童(包括学龄前儿童)那里获得更准确的信息,从学龄儿童那里获得更多样化的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
Shinrigaku Kenkyu Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Development of the Japanese version of the Peer Conflict Scale Development of the Japanese version of the Theories of Mind Wandering Scale and testing its reliability and validity Development of the Japanese version of the Financial Threat Scale Do changes in beliefs improve creativity? Investigation of an odor intensity evaluation:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1