[The effects of security camera, past littering, environment, and signboards on littering prevention].

Q4 Psychology Shinrigaku Kenkyu Pub Date : 2016-08-01 DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057
Tomoko Nakamata, Tsuneyuki Abe
{"title":"[The effects of security camera, past littering, environment, and signboards on littering prevention].","authors":"Tomoko Nakamata,&nbsp;Tsuneyuki Abe","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the\neffects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features\n(tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented.\nParticipants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional\nresponse to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results\nrevealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering.\nLittering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds\ncaused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular\neffects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards\n(no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera,\nno past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in\npreventing littering.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.87.14057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to assess litter control at a riverside location. Experiment 1 examined the effects of a security camera (presence/absence), past littering (presence/absence), and environmental features (tussock/plain ground/flowerbed). Two scenes containing combinations of these factors were presented. Participants chose the scene in which they felt it was to easier to litter. Participants also reported their emotional response to the presence/absence of a security camera and environmental features in scenes with litter. The results revealed that the presence of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, and plain ground inhibited littering. Littering in the presence of a security camera facilitated discomfort, anger, and shame, and littering in flowerbeds caused discomfort, anger, shame, and sadness. Using a similar method, Experiment 2 addressed the particular effects of a security camera combined with other factors: past littering, environmental features, and signboards (no sign/sign with eyes/security camera images). The results demonstrated the effectiveness of a security camera, no past littering, flowerbeds, plain ground, signboards presenting eyes, and images from a security camera in preventing littering.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[监控摄像头、过去乱扔垃圾、环境、招牌对防止乱扔垃圾的影响]。
进行了两项实验,以评估河滨地区的垃圾控制。实验1考察了安全摄像头(存在/不存在)、过去乱扔垃圾(存在/不存在)和环境特征(草丛/平原/花坛)的影响。提出了两个包含这些因素组合的场景。参与者选择了他们认为更容易乱扔垃圾的场景。参与者还报告了他们对是否有监控摄像头和有垃圾场景的环境特征的情绪反应。结果显示,有安全摄像头、过去没有乱扔垃圾、花圃和平坦的地面都抑制了乱扔垃圾。在监控摄像头前乱扔垃圾会让人感到不适、愤怒和羞耻,而在花坛乱扔垃圾会让人感到不适、愤怒、羞耻和悲伤。使用类似的方法,实验2解决了安全摄像头结合其他因素的特殊影响:过去的垃圾,环境特征和招牌(没有标志/有眼睛的标志/安全摄像头图像)。结果表明,安装监控摄像头、不乱扔垃圾、花圃、平整的地面、展示眼睛的指示牌、监控摄像头拍摄的图像等措施在防止乱扔垃圾方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
Shinrigaku Kenkyu Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Development of the Japanese version of the Peer Conflict Scale Development of the Japanese version of the Theories of Mind Wandering Scale and testing its reliability and validity Development of the Japanese version of the Financial Threat Scale Do changes in beliefs improve creativity? Investigation of an odor intensity evaluation:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1