Retention in Differentiated Care: Multiple Measures Analysis for a Decentralized HIV Care and Treatment Program in North Central Nigeria.

Journal of AIDS & clinical research Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-02-13 DOI:10.4172/2155-6113.1000756
Patricia A Agaba, Becky L Genberg, Atiene S Sagay, Oche O Agbaji, Seema T Meloni, Nancin Y Dadem, Grace O Kolawole, Prosper Okonkwo, Phyllis J Kanki, Norma C Ware
{"title":"Retention in Differentiated Care: Multiple Measures Analysis for a Decentralized HIV Care and Treatment Program in North Central Nigeria.","authors":"Patricia A Agaba,&nbsp;Becky L Genberg,&nbsp;Atiene S Sagay,&nbsp;Oche O Agbaji,&nbsp;Seema T Meloni,&nbsp;Nancin Y Dadem,&nbsp;Grace O Kolawole,&nbsp;Prosper Okonkwo,&nbsp;Phyllis J Kanki,&nbsp;Norma C Ware","doi":"10.4172/2155-6113.1000756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Differentiated care refers collectively to flexible service models designed to meet the differing needs of HIV-infected persons in resource-scarce settings. Decentralization is one such service model. Retention is a key indicator for monitoring the success of HIV treatment and care programs. We used multiple measures to compare retention in a cohort of patients receiving HIV care at \"hub\" (central) and \"spoke\" (decentralized) sites in a large public HIV treatment program in north central Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized longitudinal program data representing central and decentralized levels of care in the Plateau State Decentralization Initiative, north central Nigeria. We examined retention with patient- level (retention at fixed times, loss-to-follow-up [LTFU]) and visit-level (gaps-in-care, visit constancy) measures. Regression models with generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to estimate the effect of decentralization on visit-level measures. Patient-level measures were examined using survival methods with Cox regression models, controlling for baseline variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 15,650 patients, 43% were enrolled at the hub. Median time in care was 3.1 years. Hub patients were less likely to be LTFU (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR)=0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97), compared to spoke patients. Visit constancy was lower at the hub (-4.5%, 95% CI: -3.5, -5.5), where gaps in care were also more likely to occur (adjusted odds ratio=1.95, 95% CI: 1.83-2.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Decentralized sites demonstrated better retention outcomes using visit-level measures, while the hub achieved better retention outcomes using patient-level measures. Retention estimates produced by incorporating multiple measures showed substantial variation, confirming the influence of measurement strategies on the results of retention research. Future studies of retention in HIV care in sub-Saharan Africa will be well-served by including multiple measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":89166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AIDS & clinical research","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6113.1000756","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AIDS & clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Objective: Differentiated care refers collectively to flexible service models designed to meet the differing needs of HIV-infected persons in resource-scarce settings. Decentralization is one such service model. Retention is a key indicator for monitoring the success of HIV treatment and care programs. We used multiple measures to compare retention in a cohort of patients receiving HIV care at "hub" (central) and "spoke" (decentralized) sites in a large public HIV treatment program in north central Nigeria.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized longitudinal program data representing central and decentralized levels of care in the Plateau State Decentralization Initiative, north central Nigeria. We examined retention with patient- level (retention at fixed times, loss-to-follow-up [LTFU]) and visit-level (gaps-in-care, visit constancy) measures. Regression models with generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to estimate the effect of decentralization on visit-level measures. Patient-level measures were examined using survival methods with Cox regression models, controlling for baseline variables.

Results: Of 15,650 patients, 43% were enrolled at the hub. Median time in care was 3.1 years. Hub patients were less likely to be LTFU (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR)=0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97), compared to spoke patients. Visit constancy was lower at the hub (-4.5%, 95% CI: -3.5, -5.5), where gaps in care were also more likely to occur (adjusted odds ratio=1.95, 95% CI: 1.83-2.08).

Conclusion: Decentralized sites demonstrated better retention outcomes using visit-level measures, while the hub achieved better retention outcomes using patient-level measures. Retention estimates produced by incorporating multiple measures showed substantial variation, confirming the influence of measurement strategies on the results of retention research. Future studies of retention in HIV care in sub-Saharan Africa will be well-served by including multiple measures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保留差异化护理:尼日利亚中北部分散艾滋病毒护理和治疗方案的多措施分析。
目的:差别化护理是指为满足资源匮乏环境中艾滋病毒感染者的不同需求而设计的灵活服务模式。去中心化就是这样一种服务模型。保留是监测艾滋病毒治疗和护理规划成功与否的关键指标。在尼日利亚中北部的一个大型公共艾滋病毒治疗项目中,我们使用多种测量方法来比较在“中心”(中心)和“辐条”(分散)地点接受艾滋病毒治疗的一组患者的保留率。方法:这项回顾性队列研究利用了纵向项目数据,代表了尼日利亚中北部高原州分权倡议的中央和分散护理水平。我们通过患者水平(固定时间的保留,随访损失[LTFU])和访问水平(护理缺口,访问稳定性)测量来检查保留。采用广义估计方程(GEE)回归模型估计了分权对访问级测度的影响。在控制基线变量的情况下,采用生存法和Cox回归模型对患者水平的测量进行检查。结果:在15650名患者中,43%的患者入组。中位治疗时间为3.1年。与spoke患者相比,Hub患者发生LTFU的可能性更小(校正风险比(AHR)=0.91, 95% CI: 0.85-0.97)。中心的就诊稳定性较低(-4.5%,95% CI: -3.5, -5.5),在那里更容易出现护理差距(调整后的优势比=1.95,95% CI: 1.83-2.08)。结论:使用访问级别的措施,分散的站点显示了更好的保留结果,而使用患者级别的措施,中心获得了更好的保留结果。综合多种测量方法得出的留存率估计值存在较大差异,证实了测量策略对留存率研究结果的影响。今后关于撒哈拉以南非洲艾滋病毒护理保留情况的研究将通过纳入多种措施得到很好的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Needle Stick Injury by Aqueous Humor of a 31 Year Old PCR-Positive HIV Patient, a Case Report Molecular Docking-Based Screening for Novel Inhibitors of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease that Effectively Reduce the Viral Replication in Human Cells. Statistical Modeling of Survival of Tuberculosis Infected HIV Patients Treated with Antiretroviral Treatment: A Case of Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia Antiretroviral Therapy for the Treatment of HIV Editorial Note for the Journal of AIDS and Clinical Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1