Adaptation, Evolution And Reproduction Of Gaia By The Means Of Our Species.

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Theoretical Biology Forum Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.19272/201711402003
Roberto Cazzolla Gatti
{"title":"Adaptation, Evolution And Reproduction Of Gaia By The Means Of Our Species.","authors":"Roberto Cazzolla Gatti","doi":"10.19272/201711402003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nowadays, the idea that life affects the development of the planetary environment, and can, in turn, affect the future evolution of itself (in a coevolutionary way) is well-accepted. However, since the proposal of the Gaia hypothesis, there has been widespread criticism. Most of it is related to teleology, the absence of natural selection at a universal scale, and the lack of planetary reproduction. Some of the problems concerning the 'internal' logic of the idea have been resolved. Nevertheless, it is not sure whether Earth can be considered a unit of selection and (therefore) Gaia can adapt according to Darwinian evolution. After Lovelock and Margulis, Gaia has been considered a symbiotic planet composed of biotic (the biosphere) and abiotic (the geosphere-atmosphere) interacting with and coevolving elements. Here I propose why and suggest how a Gaian system should be considered alive in any evolutionary sense. I take into consideration the three principal criticisms and I analyse them following a logic-inductive reasoning. I use thought experiments and analogical arguments to analyse the rationale and the mechanisms by which Gaia evolves and may reproduce. This reasoning could allow rejecting the aforementioned criticisms as outdated and insufficient to discredit the main idea. I argue that without invoking teleology - so without any foresight or planning - a Gaian planet can be considered a coevolutionary system analogous to a multicellular body: a super-unit of selection. I describe different situations according to which Gaia is able to reproduce and transfer her planetary genome to other uninhabited or inhabited planets. Then I suggest that Gaia can face exclusion- competition-coexistence states depending on the fitness of her biota compared to those of the other reproducing biospheres. This demonstrates that Gaia can reproduce and evolve in competition-cooperation with other planets. Some deep implications arise from this evidence, also in light of the recent discovery of a new solar system with Earth-like planets by NASA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Biology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19272/201711402003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Nowadays, the idea that life affects the development of the planetary environment, and can, in turn, affect the future evolution of itself (in a coevolutionary way) is well-accepted. However, since the proposal of the Gaia hypothesis, there has been widespread criticism. Most of it is related to teleology, the absence of natural selection at a universal scale, and the lack of planetary reproduction. Some of the problems concerning the 'internal' logic of the idea have been resolved. Nevertheless, it is not sure whether Earth can be considered a unit of selection and (therefore) Gaia can adapt according to Darwinian evolution. After Lovelock and Margulis, Gaia has been considered a symbiotic planet composed of biotic (the biosphere) and abiotic (the geosphere-atmosphere) interacting with and coevolving elements. Here I propose why and suggest how a Gaian system should be considered alive in any evolutionary sense. I take into consideration the three principal criticisms and I analyse them following a logic-inductive reasoning. I use thought experiments and analogical arguments to analyse the rationale and the mechanisms by which Gaia evolves and may reproduce. This reasoning could allow rejecting the aforementioned criticisms as outdated and insufficient to discredit the main idea. I argue that without invoking teleology - so without any foresight or planning - a Gaian planet can be considered a coevolutionary system analogous to a multicellular body: a super-unit of selection. I describe different situations according to which Gaia is able to reproduce and transfer her planetary genome to other uninhabited or inhabited planets. Then I suggest that Gaia can face exclusion- competition-coexistence states depending on the fitness of her biota compared to those of the other reproducing biospheres. This demonstrates that Gaia can reproduce and evolve in competition-cooperation with other planets. Some deep implications arise from this evidence, also in light of the recent discovery of a new solar system with Earth-like planets by NASA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人类的方式适应、进化和繁殖盖亚。
如今,生命影响着地球环境的发展,并反过来影响自身未来的进化(以共同进化的方式)这一观点已被广泛接受。然而,自从盖亚假说提出以来,就受到了广泛的批评。其中大部分与目的论有关,在普遍尺度上缺乏自然选择,以及缺乏行星繁殖。关于这一思想的“内在”逻辑的一些问题已经得到解决。然而,我们还不能确定地球是否可以被视为一个选择的单位,因此盖亚是否可以根据达尔文的进化论进行适应。在洛夫洛克和马古利斯之后,盖亚被认为是一个共生行星,由生物(生物圈)和非生物(地圈-大气)相互作用和共同进化的元素组成。在这里,我提出了为什么盖亚系统在任何进化意义上都应该被认为是活的。我考虑了三个主要的批评,并根据逻辑归纳推理对它们进行了分析。我使用思想实验和类比论证来分析盖亚进化和繁殖的基本原理和机制。这种推理可以让我们拒绝上述的批评,认为这些批评是过时的,不足以质疑主要思想。我认为,在不援引目的论的情况下——也就是说,在没有任何预见或计划的情况下——盖亚行星可以被认为是一个类似于多细胞体的共同进化系统:一个选择的超级单位。我描述了不同的情况,根据盖亚能够繁殖和转移她的行星基因组到其他无人居住或有人居住的行星。然后,我认为盖亚可能面临排斥-竞争-共存的状态,这取决于她的生物群与其他繁殖生物圈相比的适应性。这表明盖亚可以在与其他行星的竞争与合作中繁殖和进化。从这一证据中产生了一些深刻的含义,也考虑到美国宇航局最近发现了一个具有类地行星的新太阳系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical Biology Forum
Theoretical Biology Forum 生物-生物学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial. The third-way third wave and the enduring appeal of bioexceptionalism. Origins and demise of selfish gene theory. Biological relativity revisited: the pre-eminent role of values. Evolution in two parts: as seen in a new fram ework for biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1