Evolution in two parts: as seen in a new fram ework for biology.

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Theoretical Biology Forum Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.19272/202211402005
Keith Baverstock
{"title":"Evolution in two parts: as seen in a new fram ework for biology.","authors":"Keith Baverstock","doi":"10.19272/202211402005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The case has been made that the-gene-centric approach to biology, which has prevailed over the past ~100 years, should be replaced by a fundamental framework based on the cell being a far from equilibrium complex dissipative system, regulated and governed by its phenotype (1, 2), the metaphor for which is a brain. This independent attractor (IA) model is a radical departure from the conventional view based on Wilhelm Johannsen's genotype-conception which has prevailed since 1910. In this prevailing paradigm the gene and the genotype are fundamental in accounting for inheritance, evolution, development, and morphogenesis: the phenotype, upon which natural selection is deemed to act, plays little or no role in these crucial aspects of biology. Here I discuss how the process of evolution might be viewed under the IA model. Based on empirical evidence, evolution can be seen as a two-part process, one part based on thermodynamics and resulting in increased resilience to perturbation of the cellular phenotype (conditioning), and the other part, based on agency exhibited by the evolving organisms. A crucial open question is: should we view the realisation of the phenotype as a matter for biochemistry, or physics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54453,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Biology Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Biology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19272/202211402005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The case has been made that the-gene-centric approach to biology, which has prevailed over the past ~100 years, should be replaced by a fundamental framework based on the cell being a far from equilibrium complex dissipative system, regulated and governed by its phenotype (1, 2), the metaphor for which is a brain. This independent attractor (IA) model is a radical departure from the conventional view based on Wilhelm Johannsen's genotype-conception which has prevailed since 1910. In this prevailing paradigm the gene and the genotype are fundamental in accounting for inheritance, evolution, development, and morphogenesis: the phenotype, upon which natural selection is deemed to act, plays little or no role in these crucial aspects of biology. Here I discuss how the process of evolution might be viewed under the IA model. Based on empirical evidence, evolution can be seen as a two-part process, one part based on thermodynamics and resulting in increased resilience to perturbation of the cellular phenotype (conditioning), and the other part, based on agency exhibited by the evolving organisms. A crucial open question is: should we view the realisation of the phenotype as a matter for biochemistry, or physics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进化分为两部分:如生物学的一个新框架中所见。
在过去的100年里一直盛行的以基因为中心的生物学方法应该被一个基本框架所取代,这个框架基于细胞是一个远离平衡的复杂耗散系统,由其表型调节和控制(1,2),这是一个大脑的隐喻。这种独立吸引子(IA)模型完全背离了自1910年以来流行的基于威廉·约翰森(Wilhelm Johannsen)基因型概念的传统观点。在这种普遍的范式中,基因和基因型是解释遗传、进化、发育和形态发生的基础:自然选择所依据的表型在生物学的这些关键方面几乎没有或根本没有作用。在这里,我将讨论在IA模型下如何看待进化过程。根据经验证据,进化可以被视为一个由两部分组成的过程,一部分基于热力学,导致细胞表型(条件作用)扰动的恢复能力增强,另一部分基于进化生物体所表现出的能动性。一个关键的悬而未决的问题是:我们应该把表现型的实现看作是生物化学的问题,还是物理学的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical Biology Forum
Theoretical Biology Forum 生物-生物学
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial. The third-way third wave and the enduring appeal of bioexceptionalism. Origins and demise of selfish gene theory. Biological relativity revisited: the pre-eminent role of values. Evolution in two parts: as seen in a new fram ework for biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1